Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach controller FTP service over network
  2. Exploit
    Send overlong user-controllable input
  3. Execution
    Overflow fixed-size stack buffer
  4. Impact
    Crash controller / denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The controller's FTP service must be enabled and network-reachable by the attacker; exploitation is remote and unauthenticated (PR:N, UI:N) against that service. Impact is limited to availability (service/device crash) - there is no confidentiality or integrity impact and no vendor claim of code execution. The principal limiting factor is network exposure: these are OT building-automation controllers normally expected to sit on segmented, non-internet-facing networks, so reachability of the FTP port from an attacker's position is the key real-world precondition. Additionally, APOGEE PXC/Modular and TALON TC devices are only affected below the listed fixed versions (BACnet < V3.5.7, P2 Ethernet < V2.8.21), while the MBC/MEC PPC families are listed as all versions.

Impact

This is a genuine operational-technology concern but not a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated vector requiring no user interaction, which is why Siemens rates it 8.7 (High). However, impact is strictly availability (VA:H; VC:N/VI:N - no confidentiality or integrity loss, no scope change), so this is a denial-of-service/crash issue consistent with CWE-121 stack buffer overflow, NOT confirmed remote code execution despite the stack-overflow primitive. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no POC were provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the real-world urgency therefore rests on exposure rather than on known in-the-wild activity. The dominant risk driver is deployment context: these are building-automation controllers that in well-architected environments should be on segmented OT networks and not internet-facing, which materially reduces the practical attack surface implied by AV:N. Note a data gap - several affected products (APOGEE MBC and MEC families) are listed as 'All versions' with no fixed version in the provided data, so remediation status for those must be verified against Siemens advisory SSA-333035.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to a controller's FTP service sends a crafted command or argument containing an overly long, user-controllable string that exceeds the expected buffer length. The unvalidated length triggers a stack buffer overflow that crashes or hangs the FTP service or the controller firmware, disrupting building-automation functions. No authentication is required and no POC is referenced in the available data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 13, 2026

Unauthenticated remote attackers can cause a denial of service on Siemens APOGEE MBC/MEC, PXC, and TALON building automation controllers by sending a crafted input that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) in the device's FTP service. The flaw affects all versions of the MBC and MEC PPC families and PXC/TALON TC models below BACnet V3.5.7 or P2 Ethernet V2.8.21. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified, and the impact is limited to availability (no confidentiality or integrity impact); real-world risk hinges on whether the FTP service is enabled and reachable from an attacker's position on the OT network.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Oct 13, 2026 - 10:07 CVSS 7.5

Unauthenticated remote attackers can crash the FTP service on Siemens APOGEE and TALON building automation controllers by supplying an over-length input field, causing a denial of service (CVSS 3.1 base score 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Affected devices include APOGEE PXC Compact and PXC Modular (BACnet versions below V3.5.7 and P2 Ethernet versions below V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact and TALON TC Modular (BACnet, below V3.5.7), plus APOGEE MBC (PPC) and APOGEE MEC (PPC) in both BACnet and P2 Ethernet variants, where all versions are listed as affected. Impact is limited to availability - no confidentiality or integrity loss - and exploitation requires network reachability to the controller's FTP port, which in typical OT deployments sits behind segmented building-automation networks. There is confirmed no CISA KEV entry and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

For affected APOGEE PXC Compact/Modular and TALON TC models, apply vendor-released patches: update to V3.5.7 or later for BACnet variants, and V2.8.21 or later for P2 Ethernet variants. For the APOGEE MBC (PPC) and MEC (PPC) families (all versions affected), no vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis; as a compensating control, disable the FTP service if it is not required, or restrict access to TCP port 21 (FTP) using network segmentation, firewall rules, or an allowlist of trusted management hosts. Note that disabling FTP may prevent firmware updates or configuration transfers, and strict port filtering may hinder remote management-plan changes accordingly. Monitor the Siemens advisory at https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-333035.html for updates.

Affected VersionsENISA

APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) 0 <*
APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) 0 <V2.8.21
TALON TC Compact (BACnet) 0 <V3.5.7
TALON TC Modular (BACnet) 0 <V3.5.7
APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) 0 <V3.5.7
APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) 0 <*
APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) 0 <V3.5.7
APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) 0 <V2.8.21
APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) 0 <*
APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) 0 <*

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the FTP service of Siemens APOGEE MBC (PPC) BACnet/P2 Ethernet, APOGEE MEC (PPC) BACnet/P2 Ethernet, APOGEE PXC Compact/Modular, and TALON TC Compact/Modular controllers. The FTP service fails to properly validate the length of user-controllable input, resulting in a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121). This class of error occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory and typically causing the service to crash. CPE strings confirm all versions of the MBC and MEC PPC variants are affected, while PXC and TALON TC models are only vulnerable below fixed versions (BACnet < V3.5.7, P2 Ethernet < V2.8.21). The independent assessment confirms no confidentiality or integrity impact and no vendor claim of code execution; the sole impact is availability.

Know when Apogee Mbc Ppc Bacnet gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (siemens) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

FTP service is remotely reachable and unauthenticated with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact is a crash only, so C:N/I:N/A:H and scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (siemens).

CVSS VectorVendor: siemens

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Oct 13, 2026 - 10:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 09:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product FTP service does not properly validate the length of user-controllable input. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Siemens APOGEE MBC/MEC, PXC, and TALON building automation controllers - the systems that run HVAC, lighting, and environmental controls across many of our facilities - are exposed to a remotely triggerable crash condition in their FTP service, affecting all MBC/MEC PPC family units and PXC/TALON TC models below BACnet V3.5.7 or P2 Ethernet V2.8.21. A successful attack takes these controllers offline, degrading building environment control and potentially cascading into facility operations disruptions; no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis. Because no vendor-released patch has been identified and the impact is availability-only, leadership should treat this as an OT resilience and exposure-management issue rather than a data-loss event, with priority driven by whether FTP is enabled and reachable on our building networks.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: disable the FTP service on MBC/MEC PPC, PXC, and TALON TC controllers where not operationally required; block or tightly restrict TCP port 21 to trusted engineering workstations via host and perimeter firewall rules; isolate affected controllers on a segmented OT network with no inbound path from corporate, guest, or wireless segments; apply connection rate limiting where supported; monitor and alert on anomalous FTP traffic and controller restarts; and maintain a tested recovery procedure for controller loss.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche industry-specific building-automation OT controllers, not broadly deployed IT software
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy