Skip to main content

Edimax BR-6478AC CVE-2026-10127

| EUVDEUVD-2026-33470 LOW
Command Injection (CWE-77)
2026-05-30 VulDB GHSA-2rjv-9xvw-8pvv
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain or guess router admin credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to web admin panel
  3. Exploit
    Craft POST request with rootAPmac containing shell metacharacters
  4. Execution
    Submit to /goform/formStaDrvSetup endpoint
  5. Impact
    OS executes injected commands on router firmware

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network access to the router's web administration interface (AV:N per CVSS) and low-privilege authentication (PR:L per CVSS) - the attacker must supply valid credentials to the device's HTTP-based management panel before reaching the vulnerable endpoint. The specific condition is submission of a POST request to /goform/formStaDrvSetup with a manipulated rootAPmac parameter value containing shell metacharacters. No user interaction is required beyond the attacker's own actions (UI:N). Exploitation is limited by: (1) the authentication requirement - unauthenticated attackers cannot reach the vulnerable handler; (2) exposure of the admin interface - devices with WAN-side management disabled are not remotely exploitable from the internet; (3) firmware version specificity - only version 1.23 is confirmed, though adjacent versions are unverified. The scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning the impact is confined to the router itself.

Impact

The CVSS 6.3 medium score reflects a meaningful but bounded attack surface: network reachable (AV:N), low complexity (AC:L), no user interaction required (UI:N), but requiring low-privilege authentication (PR:L), and with only partial impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:L/I:L/A:L, S:U). The authentication prerequisite is the primary limiting factor - an attacker must first obtain valid credentials, whether via default credentials, credential reuse, or a prior compromise. The temporal metrics elevate concern: E:P confirms a public proof-of-concept exists, RC:R indicates reasonable (though not vendor-confirmed) confidence, and RL:X signals no official remediation has been published. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from that signal. The device is a SOHO router, a class frequently deployed with unchanged default credentials and internet-exposed admin panels, which substantially raises real-world exploitability above what the CVSS base score alone implies. No CISA KEV listing was present in the provided data.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained low-privilege credentials to the Edimax BR-6478AC admin interface - through default credential use, credential stuffing, or phishing - sends a crafted HTTP POST request to /goform/formStaDrvSetup with the rootAPmac parameter containing shell metacharacters and injected commands (e.g., rootAPmac=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF;id). The router's CGI handler passes the unsanitized value directly to an OS command, executing the injected payload with the privileges of the web server process, commonly root on embedded Linux devices. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating this technique is available at the Notion page referenced in the CVE.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 30, 2026

Authenticated command injection in Edimax BR-6478AC 1.23 firmware allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege credentials to execute arbitrary OS commands via the rootAPmac parameter in the formStaDrvSetup POST handler at /goform/formStaDrvSetup. The CVSS temporal vector confirms a public proof-of-concept (E:P) with reasonable confidence in the report (RC:R), while remediation level remains undefined (RL:X), indicating no vendor patch has been publicly acknowledged. No public exploit identified at time of analysis as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV), but publicly available exploit code exists, elevating practical risk for deployed devices.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - the CVSS remediation level RL:X and absence of any Edimax advisory confirm this. As compensating controls, administrators should immediately restrict access to the router's web administration interface to trusted internal IP addresses only, disabling remote (WAN-side) web management if enabled. Default credentials should be replaced with strong, unique passwords, as credential access is a prerequisite for exploitation (PR:L). Placing the device behind a firewall that blocks external access to the admin panel on ports 80 and 443 eliminates the network attack vector for external threat actors. Network segmentation that prevents untrusted LAN clients from reaching the admin interface further reduces exposure. Monitor VulDB entry https://vuldb.com/vuln/367304 and the Edimax security advisory page for patch availability. Note that disabling remote management does not protect against authenticated internal threat actors.

Affected VersionsENISA

BR-6478AC 1.23

Affected Packages

euvd br_6478ac no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the formStaDrvSetup function within the embedded web server's POST request handler, located at the URI /goform/formStaDrvSetup. This endpoint is typical of SOHO router firmware built on embedded Linux platforms using CGI-style form handlers. CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command) identifies the root cause: the rootAPmac argument - intended to accept a MAC address of a root access point for station driver configuration - is passed to an OS command without proper sanitization or escaping of shell metacharacters. This allows an attacker to append or inject arbitrary shell commands. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:edimax:br-6478ac:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version field, suggesting NVD may not have constrained the vulnerable range beyond the 1.23 version confirmed by VulDB.

Know when Br 6478Ac gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
May 30, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
May 30, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)

DescriptionCVE.org

A weakness has been identified in Edimax BR-6478AC 1.23. This affects the function formStaDrvSetup of the file /goform/formStaDrvSetup of the component POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument rootAPmac causes command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 25% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

31
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy