Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to malicious web page
-
DeliveryServe crafted graphics content
-
ExploitTrigger flaw in Graphics component
-
ExecutionDefeat content-process sandbox
-
ImpactExecute code on host system
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the victim to visit or render attacker-controlled web content in Firefox (UI:R), with no authentication or privileges needed (PR:N). The affected vector is the Graphics component in affected Firefox/Firefox ESR builds prior to 157/ESR 153.4/140.17/115.42 in their default configuration. The principal limiting factor is that a sandbox escape alone does not yield code execution - it must be combined with a separate content-process compromise to break out of the sandbox, consistent with CISA's 'Automatable: no' rating; this chaining requirement, plus the mandatory user interaction, meaningfully constrains real-world exploitation despite the critical score. |
| Impact | Signals conflict sharply here, so prioritization should be nuanced. The CVSS 3.1 score of 9.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) is critical, driven by the scope change (S:C) inherent to a sandbox escape and full C/I/A impact, requiring only user interaction and no privileges. However, nearly every other signal points lower: EPSS is just 0.16% (4th percentile), CISA SSVC rates Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (with Technical Impact 'total'), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public POC is referenced. This is therefore a genuinely severe-impact flaw but NOT evidence of imminent or widespread exploitation - a high-CVSS issue whose real-world exploitation risk is currently low. A critical caveat: a Graphics-component sandbox escape (CWE-693, Protection Mechanism Failure) is rarely exploitable in isolation - it typically must be chained with a separate content-process compromise to achieve full code execution on the host, which the SSVC 'Automatable: no' rating reflects. Patch urgency remains high for browser fleets given Firefox's ubiquity and the trivial AC:L/UI:R exploitation path once chained, but it is not a drop-everything emergency absent evidence of in-the-wild use. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A victim is lured to an attacker-controlled web page (satisfying the UI:R requirement) that delivers crafted content exercising the flaw in Firefox's Graphics component. The flaw defeats the browser's sandbox protection, and when chained with a content-process compromise, lets the attacker escape the sandbox and execute code with the host user's privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026
Sandbox escape in Mozilla Firefox's Graphics component allows unauthenticated remote attackers to break out of the browser's content sandbox when a victim renders attacker-controlled web content (CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C, score 9.6). Affected builds are Firefox before 157 and Firefox ESR before 153.4, 140.17, and 115.42, all of which now have vendor fixes available across their respective release trains. Exploitation requires chaining the escape with a separate content-process compromise to achieve code execution, which is consistent with CISA SSVC's 'Automatable: no' and 'Exploitation: none' ratings; EPSS is low at 0.16% (4th percentile) and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available: upgrade to Firefox 157, Firefox ESR 153.4, Firefox ESR 140.17, or Firefox ESR 115.42 as applicable to your channel, with fixes documented in Mozilla advisories mfsa2026-97 through mfsa2026-103 and Bugzilla 2068367; organizations on the legacy ESR 115 branch should treat 115.42 as a stopgap and plan migration to the 140 ESR line, since older ESR branches receive narrower support. If immediate patching is not possible, targeted hardening that reduces the exposed Graphics attack surface includes setting webgl.disabled to true (breaks WebGL-based pages, 3D content, and some mapping/CAD web apps) and disabling hardware acceleration so compositing runs on the less privileged software path (degrades rendering, video playback, and battery performance); these are surface-reduction measures and are not vendor-confirmed mitigations for this specific defect. Because a sandbox escape alone does not yield code execution and must be chained with a separate content-process compromise, and given the low EPSS of 0.16% (4th percentile) and SSVC 'Exploitation: none', patch timing can be risk-weighted - but the CVSS 9.6 score, total technical impact, and the fact that graphics sandbox escapes are attractive as part of exploit chains argue for prioritizing patching on high-value, targeted-risk, or high-exposure endpoints rather than relying on compensating controls alone.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Firefox runs web content in a restricted content process that communicates with privileged GPU/compositor and parent processes over IPC; the Graphics component (WebGL, canvas, compositing, and the graphics IPC surface) is one of the interfaces where a content-process attacker can attempt to reach privileged code. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) captures the root cause class here: the sandbox's isolation guarantees are bypassable, meaning the protection mechanism itself fails rather than a memory-safety bug being the primary defect. Because the CVSS vector has Scope Changed (S:C) with C:H/I:H/A:H, the assessed impact is total once the escape succeeds, yet a sandbox escape is by itself a boundary violation rather than a full code-execution chain - it must be combined with an independent content-process compromise, which is why CISA's SSVC rates technical impact 'total' while marking Exploitation 'none' and Automatable 'no'. Note that the automated 'Information Disclosure' tag attached to this CVE understates the assessed C:H/I:H/A:H impact and should be treated as low-fidelity metadata; the authoritative references are Mozilla Bugzilla 2068367 and advisories mfsa2026-97 through mfsa2026-103, which cover the affected release trains. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is version-wildcarded and does not distinguish standard Firefox from ESR branch builds, so version handling must come from the advisory text.
Know when Firefox gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Web-delivered content needs user visit (AV:N/UI:R, PR:N); sandbox escape crosses a security boundary so S:C with full host C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (mozilla).
CVSS VectorVendor: mozilla
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Sandbox escape in the Graphics component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox ESR 153.4, Firefox 157, Firefox ESR 115.42, and Firefox ESR 140.17.
Executive ViewAI
A critical sandbox-escape flaw in Mozilla Firefox's Graphics component can let a malicious or compromised web page break the browser's content sandbox on any unpatched Firefox or Firefox ESR build, meaning an ordinary browsing session by an employee could expose their endpoint. The escape alone does not yield full code execution - an attacker must also compromise the browser's content process - but that chain would turn routine web browsing into a system-level compromise path on corporate devices. Because Firefox is widely deployed across the workforce, leadership should treat this as a browser fleet patching priority with verification that no affected builds remain.
Apply vendor patch. While those builds are being deployed, exposure can be reduced by limiting rendering of untrusted web content for high-risk user groups and by confirming that the separate content-process compromise required for code execution is blocked by existing endpoint protection and browser hardening.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Use-after-free vulnerability in the serializeToStream implementation in the XMLSerializer component in Mozilla Firefox b
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
The crypto.generateCRMFRequest function in Mozilla Firefox before 23.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.8, Thunderbird befo
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and SeaMonkey before 2.25 allow remo
Integer underflow in the nsHtml5TreeBuilder class in the HTML5 string parser in Mozilla Firefox before 45.0 and Firefox
Mozilla Firefox before 37.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.6, and Thunderbird before 31.6 do not properly restrict resource
Mozilla Firefox before 37.0 relies on docshell type information instead of page principal information for Window.webidl
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for
EUVD-2026-88927
GHSA-mw76-22g7-fw96
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB