CheckPoint Identity Agent
CVE-2025-8304
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged user on Terminal Server
-
ExploitRead Check Point Identity Agent registry keys
-
ExecutionExtract another user's sensitive identity data
-
ImpactClaim that user's security policy rules
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already be an authenticated local user with an interactive session on a Windows Terminal Server that is running the Check Point Identity Agent (the multi-user Terminal Server deployment mode is the specific prerequisite - this is not a single-user workstation scenario). The concrete technical condition is that sensitive identity/policy information is readable in the agent's Windows Registry keys by non-privileged users. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: there is no network vector (AV:L), the attacker must hold valid credentials/local access (PR:L), the host must be a shared Terminal Server with the Identity Agent installed, and at least one OTHER user's policy data must be present on the same host for the cross-user impact to be meaningful. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, not high-urgency, issue. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.5 (MEDIUM) with vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - meaning exploitation requires LOCAL access and an authenticated low-privileged account (PR:L), not remote network reach. The elevated score is driven largely by the scope change (S:C), reflecting that one user can learn information enabling them to claim ANOTHER user's security policy rules, i.e. impact crosses a security boundary. Supporting exploitation signals are weak and consistent with each other: EPSS is only 0.12% (2nd percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. All signals align - low real-world exploitation probability, no active exploitation, local-only vector - so there is no conflict to reconcile here. This is best characterized as a genuine confidentiality/authorization weakness worth patching in Terminal Server multi-user environments, but not an emergency: it is a high-CVSS-feeling (scope change) but low-real-risk issue in practice because it is gated behind authenticated local access on a shared Terminal Server. The single vendor reference (Check Point sk184263) is behind a support portal and was not independently retrievable, so affected-version detail is not confirmed here. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A legitimate but low-privileged user logged into a shared Windows Terminal Server running the Check Point Identity Agent reads sensitive values stored in the agent's Windows Registry keys. Using that disclosed information, they impersonate or 'claim' the security policy rules assigned to a different user on the same server, gaining access aligned with that other identity. No public exploit code is known, so exploitation would require manual registry inspection by someone already authenticated on the host. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 19, 2026
Cross-user security-policy data disclosure in CheckPoint Identity Agent on Windows Terminal Servers is a moderate, not high-urgency, issue: an authenticated local user with an interactive session can read sensitive identity and policy information from the agent's registry keys and may be able to claim another user's security policy rules. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N) confirms local access is required and that only confidentiality is directly impacted, with scope change reflecting cross-user impact on a shared Terminal Server. EPSS is 0.12% (2nd percentile), no KEV designation is present in the provided intelligence, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; meaningful exploitation also requires another user's policy data to be present on the same Terminal Server.
RemediationAI
Check Point advisory https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184263 is the primary remediation reference, but the provided intelligence does not specify an exact fixed version, so patch availability is not confirmed from available data and the corrected Identity Agent build should be verified with the vendor before upgrading Terminal Server deployments. If an immediate vendor fix is not available, restrict interactive logon to the Terminal Server to trusted users and reduce the number of accounts sharing the host, recognizing that this changes business access and may not eliminate cross-user exposure. Audit and tighten ACLs on the Identity Agent's Windows Registry keys so non-privileged users cannot read other users' identity/policy data, but test first because overly restrictive permissions can break agent functionality or legitimate policy retrieval. Removing the Identity Agent from shared Terminal Servers where cross-user policy data is not required eliminates the exposure at the cost of losing agent-based identity features on those hosts.
Affected ProductsAI
CheckPoint Identity Agent running on a Windows Terminal Server in multi-user mode is the affected product scenario. The provided intelligence does not include exact affected version ranges or CPE identifiers; version applicability must be confirmed in Check Point advisory https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184263. The stated prerequisite is a shared Terminal Server deployment where sensitive registry data for one user can be read by another authenticated local user, not a standard single-user workstation installation.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) is the root-cause class: CheckPoint Identity Agent stores identity/policy-related data in Windows Registry keys, and in multi-user Terminal Server deployments the key permissions allow non-privileged authenticated users to read data belonging to other users. Terminal Server is a shared Windows instance where multiple interactive sessions coexist, so a local user can inspect registry locations that should be scoped per-user or protected by stricter ACLs. No CPE strings were supplied in the intelligence; the affected platform is Windows Terminal Server with the Identity Agent installed, and the primary remediation reference is Check Point advisory sk184263. The issue is an access-control/permissions weakness in local data storage rather than a network-facing protocol flaw.
Know when Checkpoint gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L/PR:L), reliable registry read (AC:L), scope change (S:C) since disclosed data affects another user's policy; pure confidentiality impact so I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (checkpoint).
CVSS VectorVendor: checkpoint
DescriptionCVE.org
An authenticated local user can obtain information that allows claiming security policy rules of another user due to sensitive information being accessible in the Windows Registry keys for Check Point Identity Agent running on a Terminal Server.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Checkpoint
View allGNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which
Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the inte
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of
backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to e
Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway arises from improper certificate trust validation during V
Authentication bypass in the Check Point SmartConsole login process lets an unauthenticated remote attacker mint a valid
Authentication bypass in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Spark Firewalls allows unauthenticated remote attacker
Unauthenticated attackers who can reach the file-upload interface of Check Point Management Server can combine directory
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. Rated med
Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Quantum Security Management stems from a heap-based bu
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Check Point Quantum Security Management, where a stack-based buffer overfl
The huggingface/transformers library is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through deserialization of untrusted data
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB