OpenText Flipper CVE-2025-8050
MEDIUMAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft request with path-traversal sequence
-
ExploitFlipper resolves attacker-controlled file path
-
ImpactRead limited server-hosted files
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling File name/path control
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets the OpenText Flipper component that accepts an externally controlled file name or path (CWE-73) and fails to constrain it to the intended directory, letting an unauthenticated actor (PR:N) read files hosted on the server. Key limiting factors: the vector requires passive user interaction (UI:P in CVSS 4.0), so an attacker generally depends on a victim initiating the crafted request; impact is rated Low (VC:L), implying only partial or restricted file disclosure rather than full arbitrary-file read; and exposure is confined to deployments running the affected Flipper 3.1.2. No non-default configuration prerequisite is stated in the available data. |
| Impact | This is a medium-severity, lower-priority issue rather than an urgent one. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3 (Medium), driven by a network attack vector with low complexity and no privileges (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) but tempered by required user interaction (UI:P) and only Low impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). EPSS corroborates low urgency at 0.29% (20th percentile), and there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis - so exploitation evidence is absent. The 4.0 supplemental/threat metrics are mixed: Automatable is Yes (AU:Y) and the vendor's own Urgency tag is Green, meaning the vendor itself treats this as low urgency despite the flaw being scriptable. One internal inconsistency to verify: the description characterizes the flaw purely as read-only file access (a confidentiality concern), yet the vendor vector also asserts Low integrity and availability impact (VI:L/VA:L) - the description does not substantiate integrity/availability effects, so the true impact is likely confidentiality-only and the I/A scoring should be confirmed with OpenText. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a request to an OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 endpoint supplying a manipulated file path/name parameter containing directory-traversal sequences, causing the application to return a file outside the intended directory on the server. Because user interaction is required (UI:P), the attacker likely needs a victim to trigger the malicious request (e.g., following a crafted link), and the disclosed content is limited (VC:L). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Path traversal in OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 lets an unauthenticated remote actor supply an externally controlled file name or path that is not constrained to the intended directory, allowing files hosted on the server to be read - though only with the low-impact, partial disclosure reflected in the assessed CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N vector. Exploitation generally depends on a victim triggering the crafted request (passive user interaction, UI:P in the CVSS 4.0 vector), and the score of 5.3 with an EPSS of 0.29% (20th percentile) marks this as a medium-severity, lower-priority issue rather than an urgent one. There is no CISA KEV entry and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No exact fixed version or patch identifier is provided in the available data, so the first action is to consult the OpenText advisory (KB0850526, https://support.opentext.com/csm?id=ot_kb_unauthenticated&sysparm_article=KB0850526) for the vendor-recommended update path and apply the fixed release as soon as it is published - patch status should be treated as not confirmed from the input rather than assumed. Because exploitation requires the vulnerable path-handling endpoint to be reachable and a victim to trigger the request, effective interim mitigations are: do not expose Flipper directly to untrusted networks (place it behind an authenticated reverse proxy or VPN - trade-off is reduced accessibility for legitimate users); restrict access to the file-serving endpoint to known client networks via firewall or proxy allow-lists; and run the Flipper service under an account whose file-system read access is limited to the application's own data directory so that traversal cannot reach sensitive system paths (trade-off is possible breakage of legitimate file-serving functionality if the scope is set too narrowly). A reverse proxy or WAF rule that normalizes and rejects encoded traversal sequences (../, %2e%2e%2f, and similar encodings) provides defence in depth but can be bypassed and should not be relied on alone. Monitor application and web logs for traversal patterns and unexpected reads of files outside the intended directory.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path): the OpenText Flipper component accepts a user-supplied file name or path and fails to constrain it to its intended directory, so traversal sequences can redirect the file-serving logic to paths outside the intended scope. This is a classic path/directory traversal pattern affecting server-side file handling rather than a memory-safety or injection flaw, and it is the reason the impact is confined to confidentiality (C:L) with no integrity or availability effect in the assessed vector. The affected artifact is identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:opentext:flipper:3.1.2, i.e. only Flipper 3.1.2 is named. Note the two vectors in play: the vendor/NVD CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L, with subsequent-system impacts all None and safety value S:P) and the independent CVSS 3.1 reassessment of AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N; both agree on network reachability, low complexity, no privileges required, and low confidentiality-only impact, and both require some form of user interaction, which materially limits automated mass exploitation. Impact is rated Low, implying restricted or partial file disclosure rather than full arbitrary-file read.
Know when Flipper gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/S:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Green
Network-reachable traversal needing a user to trigger the request (UI:R) and no auth (PR:N); description supports only limited file read, so C:L with I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (opentext).
CVSS VectorVendor: opentext
DescriptionCVE.org
External Control of File Name or Path vulnerability in opentext Flipper allows Path Traversal.
The vulnerability could allow a user to access files hosted on the server.
This issue affects Flipper: 3.1.2.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
Information disclosure in OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to use absolute path traversal
Path traversal in OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 lets an application user submit a stored local file path through the product's
Low-privilege users of OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 can elevate privileges within the application due to insufficient granular
Authenticated low-privilege users of OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 can inject Hibernate Query Language (HQL) expressions into t
Low-privilege users of OpenText Flipper 3.1.2 can bypass intended access controls to interact with the backend API witho
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB