Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain admin credentials via phishing or theft
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to FortiOS/FortiProxy CLI
-
ExploitCraft debug CLI commands targeting Lua interpreter
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary Lua scripts at privileged level
-
ImpactAchieve full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Asset protection level
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires authenticated access as an administrator (PR:H per CVSS vector) with CLI access to the device - this is a local attack vector (AV:L), meaning the attacker must have interactive CLI or console-level access, not just network reachability to management ports. The specific condition enabling exploitation is the presence of an exposed Lua scripting debug capability reachable via crafted CLI commands; no special non-default configuration beyond a standard admin CLI session is described as required. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the requirement for high-privilege admin credentials, which are not obtained through this vulnerability itself; (2) local/CLI access vector, ruling out purely remote unauthenticated exploitation; and (3) no user interaction required once admin CLI access is established. The primary realistic attack scenarios are insider threat, post-compromise escalation after credential theft, or an attacker who has already pivoted to admin-level access and seeks to abuse debug capabilities to exceed intended administrative scope. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 6.0 (Medium) reflects the significant constraint of requiring high-privilege local access (AV:L/PR:H), which substantially limits attack surface compared to a typical RCE vulnerability. Despite the High impact ratings across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H), these are conditional on an attacker who is already an authenticated administrator - a position that carries broad inherent access. The real-world priority is therefore primarily relevant in scenarios involving insider threats, compromised admin credentials, or post-compromise lateral movement where an attacker has obtained admin rights and seeks to expand capability or evade logging. The E:P temporal metric confirms a proof-of-concept exists, raising the urgency modestly - this is not purely theoretical. However, there is no CISA KEV listing and no indication of active exploitation campaigns. The RL:O (Official Remedy) indicator confirms Fortinet has released patches, making the risk window primarily relevant to unpatched deployments. EPSS score data was not provided in the source intelligence; exploitation probability should be considered low-to-moderate given the high privilege requirement but non-zero given POC availability. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has compromised an administrator account - whether through credential theft, phishing, or insider access - authenticates to the FortiOS or FortiProxy CLI and issues specially crafted commands that invoke the exposed Lua scripting debug interface. Through this interface, the attacker executes Lua scripts at an elevated system level beyond standard administrative permissions, potentially reading sensitive configuration data, modifying firewall policies, or disrupting availability. A proof-of-concept demonstrating this technique exists, meaning the crafted CLI command syntax is not purely theoretical. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026
Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy expose an internal debug interface (CWE-1244) that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary Lua scripts through crafted CLI commands, exceeding their intended administrative scope. The vulnerability spans broad version ranges of both products, including FortiOS 6.4 through 7.6.2 and FortiProxy 7.0 through 7.6.3. While exploitation requires existing high-privilege (admin) access - limiting opportunistic attack surface - the CVSS temporal vector (E:P) confirms a proof-of-concept exploit exists, and the official fix is available (RL:O). No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the proof-of-concept, and this vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory (official fix confirmed by RL:O CVSS temporal metric) - consult the Fortinet PSIRT advisory at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-143 for exact fixed versions for each affected FortiOS and FortiProxy branch, as specific patch version numbers were not provided in the available intelligence. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict CLI and management console access to the minimum required administrator accounts using Fortinet's administrative access controls and trusted host restrictions. Enabling detailed CLI audit logging can help detect exploitation attempts. Disabling or removing unnecessary admin accounts reduces exposure to compromised credential scenarios. Note that these controls reduce risk but do not remediate the underlying debug interface exposure - patching remains the definitive fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-1244 ('Internal Asset Exposed to Unsafe Debug Access Level or State') describes a class of vulnerabilities where debug or test interfaces - typically intended only for development or factory use - remain accessible in production firmware, exposing capabilities beyond what the normal operational interface is supposed to permit. In FortiOS and FortiProxy, the Lua scripting engine (used internally for automation and testing) is reachable via specially crafted CLI commands by an administrator. This means an admin who should only have access to standard management operations can invoke a Lua interpreter at a privileged system level, effectively bypassing the intended capability boundary. Affected CPEs are cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortios and cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy across the version ranges specified. The CVSS local attack vector (AV:L) confirms this requires CLI or console-level access to the device, not a remote network path.
Know when Fortios gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
An Internal Asset Exposed to Unsafe Debug Access Level or State vulnerability [CWE-1244] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.16, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.14, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated admin to execute lua scripts via crafted CLI commands.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi
FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0
Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiOS (6.4 through 7.6.3) and FortiSwitchManager (7.0.x/7.2.x) lets an attacker run
Path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM, and FortiSwitchManager allows authenticated admi
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sslvpn login page in Fortinet FortiOS 5.2.x before 5.2.3 allows remote a
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers with knowledge of upstream/do
An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS
EUVD-2025-210085
GHSA-h6fm-ggmr-98gx
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB