F5OS CVE-2025-61955
HIGHAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege local account
-
DeliverySupply crafted input to injectable component
-
ExploitTrigger code injection (CWE-95)
-
ExecutionExecute code at elevated privilege
-
ImpactCross security boundary / full appliance control
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Eval input sanitization
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker to already hold an authenticated local account with low privileges (PR:L) on an F5OS-A or F5OS-C appliance; there is no remote or network vector and no user interaction is needed (AV:L/UI:N). The code-injection flaw (CWE-95) is then used to execute code at a higher privilege level and cross a security boundary. Key limiting factors: the attacker must already be authenticated and have local shell/management access to the device, so realistic risk is confined to multi-tenant deployments, shared-admin environments, or scenarios where an attacker has an existing foothold. Appliances running software versions past End of Technical Support were not evaluated by F5 and may differ. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but second-tier priority. All signals point to a local privilege-escalation issue rather than a remotely exploitable, mass-scannable flaw. The F5-assigned CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) confirms the attacker must already have local access and low-level authenticated privileges on the appliance, which sharply limits the pool of potential attackers - this is a post-compromise or malicious-insider escalation, not an internet-facing breach. The high VC:H/VI:H/VA:H impact and CWE-95 (code injection/eval injection) justify the 8.5 'High' score, because a successful exploit fully crosses a security boundary and yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the appliance. EPSS reinforces the lower urgency: 0.25% probability at the 15th percentile indicates very low predicted near-term exploitation, consistent with a local-only vector. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code referenced, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS 4.0 vector and the description are mutually consistent (both indicate local, authenticated access), so there is no contradiction to flag. Net: patch on a normal-to-elevated cadence for exposed/multi-tenant F5OS appliances where low-privileged local accounts exist, but this is not a drop-everything emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged user who already has authenticated local access to an F5OS-A or F5OS-C appliance (e.g., a limited operator account or a foothold gained via another issue) injects crafted input into a component that evaluates it as code (CWE-95), executing commands at a higher privilege level. This crosses the appliance's security boundary to gain elevated/root-equivalent control. No public proof-of-concept exploit is referenced in the available data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 18, 2026
Local privilege escalation in F5OS-A and F5OS-C allows an authenticated low-privileged user with local access to execute injected code at a higher privilege level and cross a security boundary. The flaw is rated CVSS 8.5 and classified CWE-95 (eval injection); the assessed vector is local, low-complexity, low-privilege, and no-interaction. No public exploit code or CISA KEV entry was identified in the provided intelligence, and EPSS is 0.25% (15th percentile), so realistic risk is concentrated in environments where an attacker already has a local foothold, such as shared-admin or multi-tenant deployments.
RemediationAI
No specific patched F5OS-A or F5OS-C version is identified in the supplied data, so the authoritative remediation source is F5 advisory K000156771 at https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000156771; identify the fixed release there and upgrade supported appliances accordingly, and move any EoTS releases to a supported version because they were not evaluated. Until the vendor fix is applied, reduce exposure by removing unnecessary local shell and management accounts, enforcing least privilege for local users, restricting console and management access to trusted administrators and networks, and monitoring for privilege changes or unexpected code execution. Restricting local shell access may interfere with legitimate troubleshooting workflows, and tightening management-plane access can complicate administration, but both measures directly reduce the preconditions for this local privilege-escalation path, especially on shared-admin or multi-tenant appliances.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
F5OS-A and F5OS-C are appliance operating systems used across F5 platforms, and the CPE data covers both f5:f5os-a (including version 1.8.0) and f5:f5os-c with wildcard version entries. The root cause is CWE-95, Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection'), meaning attacker-influenced input reaches a dynamically evaluated code path and can be executed in a more privileged context. The assessed CVSS:3.1 vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H: exploitation requires local access and a low-privileged authenticated account, with no user interaction, and successful exploitation gives high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact within the same security scope. F5 notes that software versions past End of Technical Support were not evaluated, so affected and fixed version boundaries should be confirmed against the vendor advisory.
Know when F5Os A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local authenticated low-privilege access is required (AV:L/PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and successful code injection yields full high impact on the appliance (C:H/I:H/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (f5).
CVSS VectorVendor: f5
DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability exists in F5OS-A and F5OS-C systems that may allow an authenticated attacker with local access to escalate their privileges. A successful exploit may allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Executive ViewAI
F5OS-A and F5OS-C contain a high-severity local privilege-escalation flaw that could allow an authenticated low-privileged local user to cross a security boundary on affected systems. Leadership should care because no vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis and the risk is concentrated in shared-admin or multi-tenant deployments where a local foothold could undermine isolation; however, no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low, so immediate priority is limiting local access and monitoring.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict local access to F5OS-A and F5OS-C, enforce least privilege for local accounts, monitor for privilege-escalation activity, and reduce shared-admin or multi-tenant exposure.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
On an F5OS system, if the root user had previously configured the system to allow login via SSH key-based authentication
In F5OS-A version 1.x before 1.1.0 and F5OS-C version 1.x before 1.5.0, excessive file permissions in F5OS allows an aut
On F5OS, an improper authorization vulnerability exists where remotely authenticated users (LDAP, RADIUS, TACACS+) may b
Privilege escalation in F5OS-A and F5OS-C allows an authenticated attacker with a local low-privilege account to cross a
When running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker assigned the Administrator or Resource Administrator role may
On F5OS-A beginning in version 1.2.0 to before 1.3.0 and F5OS-C beginning in version 1.3.0 to before 1.5.0, processing F
SNMP on F5OS-A appliance and F5OS-C chassis systems can be driven into memory exhaustion by undisclosed requests, allowi
Memory corruption in F5OS-A and F5OS-C is a moderate-priority issue, not a top-tier emergency: an out-of-bounds write ca
F5OS-A on F5 rSeries systems can expose sensitive FIPS hardware security module (HSM) information to a highly privileged
When LDAP remote authentication is configured on F5OS, a remote user without an assigned role will be incorrectly author
A directory traversal vulnerability exists in the F5OS QKView utility that allows an authenticated attacker to read file
In F5OS-A version 1.x before 1.1.0 and F5OS-C version 1.x before 1.4.0, a directory traversal vulnerability exists in an
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB