Fortinet FortiSandbox
CVE-2025-54353
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious HTTP request/link
-
DeliveryLure admin to open URL
-
ExploitUnsanitized input reflected in page
-
ExecutionJavaScript executes in console context
-
ImpactHijack admin session / act as user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the FortiSandbox administrative web interface to be reachable by the attacker-supplied request and, critically, an authenticated administrator or operator must be tricked into opening the attacker-crafted HTTP request or link (UI:R) for the reflected payload to execute in their browser. Limiting factors: the mandatory user-interaction step (no silent/automatable mass exploitation), impact confined to the victim's browser session rather than the appliance OS (Low C/I, no availability impact), and exposure depends on whether the management interface is internet-facing versus restricted to a trusted management network. No special non-default product feature toggle is named in the description - the flaw is in web page generation handling crafted HTTP requests. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity reflected cross-site scripting flaw (CVSS 6.1) in Fortinet FortiSandbox management interfaces. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N indicates network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated triggering (PR:N) but mandatory user interaction (UI:R) - the victim must load an attacker-crafted request/link, which is the primary factor limiting mass exploitation. The scope change (S:C) and Low C/I impacts are consistent with script execution in the browser context rather than direct compromise of the appliance OS. Signals partially conflict: EPSS is elevated at 6.31% / 93rd percentile, which is high for a reflected XSS and suggests notable scanner/exploit interest, yet there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so the EPSS figure likely reflects the general attention Fortinet appliance CVEs attract rather than confirmed in-the-wild use. Net assessment: a credible but secondary priority - real risk exists against admins of exposed FortiSandbox web consoles, but the UI:R requirement and absence of KEV/POC place it below network-unauthenticated RCE-class Fortinet issues. Patch promptly as part of routine maintenance; the Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-25-477 is the authoritative source for fixed versions, which were not enumerated in the provided data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious URL or HTTP request targeting the FortiSandbox web interface and lures an authenticated administrator into opening it (e.g., via phishing). When the admin's browser renders the unsanitized response, attacker-controlled JavaScript executes in the context of the FortiSandbox console, potentially stealing session tokens or performing actions as the admin. No public proof-of-concept exploit was identified at the time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Reflected cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiSandbox (5.0.0 through 5.0.2, 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, and all versions of 4.2 and 4.0) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject script into the appliance's web management interface via crafted HTTP requests. Exploitation is not automatable at scale: because the CVSS vector carries UI:R, the payload only fires if a logged-in administrator or operator is lured into opening the attacker-supplied request or link in their browser, and the resulting impact is confined to that victim's browser session (Low confidentiality and integrity, no availability impact). The flaw is rated CVSS 6.1 with an EPSS score of 6.31% (93rd percentile), indicating elevated likelihood relative to the broader CVE population, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not confirmed actively exploited (not in CISA KEV).
RemediationAI
Fortinet tracks this issue under PSIRT advisory FG-IR-25-477 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-477); the exact fixed release versions are not specified in the provided data, so consult that advisory's solution section and upgrade affected FortiSandbox appliances to the listed fixed build for each branch - patch status is therefore 'not confirmed from available data' rather than a known fix version, and no version numbers should be assumed. Until upgraded, reduce exposure by restricting the FortiSandbox administrative web interface to a trusted management network or VPN rather than the internet (trade-off: removes remote admin convenience and requires jump-host or VPN access), and limit who holds admin/operator logins. Because the vector requires UI:R, administrator awareness is an effective compensating control: do not open unsolicited links or paste crafted HTTP requests while authenticated to the FortiSandbox UI, log out of the admin session when not in use, and use a separate browser profile for appliance management (trade-off: operational discipline, not a technical guarantee). Deploying a content-security-policy and modern browser XSS protections on admin workstations can further blunt reflected payload execution, though these are defense-in-depth measures only and not a substitute for the vendor fix.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox's administrative web application. The appliance fails to properly encode or escape attacker-controllable input that is reflected back into a generated HTML page, so a crafted HTTP request causes the browser to render and execute attacker-supplied script in the context of the FortiSandbox management UI. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N confirms the attack is network-delivered and needs no attacker credentials, but it requires victim user interaction and changes scope (S:C), meaning the script executes in a security context (the admin's browser session / management origin) distinct from the vulnerable component itself. Impact is limited to the victim's browser session - session data and page content can be read or altered - rather than code execution on the FortiSandbox operating system, which is why C and I are Low and A is None. The four CPE entries (cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox) correspond to the separate vulnerable release branches 5.0.x, 4.4.x, 4.2.x and 4.0.x, all sharing the same web-generation flaw. The relevant advisory is Fortinet PSIRT FG-IR-25-477.
Know when Fortisandbox gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Reflected XSS reachable over the network without authentication (PR:N) but requiring an admin to open a crafted link (UI:R); script runs in browser context causing a scope change with Low confidentiality/integrity and no availability impact.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions may allow an attacker to perform an XSS attack via crafted HTTP requests.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
More in Fortisandbox
View allOS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth
Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attac
Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve
OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox allows an authenticated attacker with low-privilege credentials to execute
Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS varia
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows una
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerabi
A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandb
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F
Multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenti
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB