Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain kernel/Ring 0 local privileged access
-
DeliveryAcquire specialized DCAP internal knowledge
-
ExploitSupply crafted inputs exploiting CWE-223 omission in attestation primitives
-
ExecutionProduce manipulated or incomplete attestation Quote
-
PersistDownstream relying system consumes falsified attestation
-
ImpactHigh-integrity compromise of trust-dependent subsequent system
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A09:2025 - Security Logging & Alerting Failures
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Omission of security-relevant info
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires all of the following simultaneously: (1) local access to the target system - no remote vector exists (AV:L); (2) a privileged, kernel-level user account (PR:H, Ring 0 access); (3) high attack complexity including specialized internal knowledge of SGX DCAP internals (AC:H); and (4) specific attack conditions to be present within the DCAP environment (AT:P). Exploitation does NOT require user interaction (UI:N). The direct impact on the vulnerable system is constrained (low integrity, low availability), but exploitation must be chained to downstream systems that consume and trust the attestation output to achieve the high subsequent-system integrity impact (SI:H). Factors that limit exploitation: the requirement for pre-existing kernel privilege eliminates remote and unprivileged attackers; the AT:P condition requires special internal knowledge unavailable to generic threat actors; and the absence of public POC further reduces near-term exploitation probability. |
| Impact | The vendor-provided CVSS 4.0 score of 4.3 (Medium) accurately reflects the significant exploitation barriers: local access only (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), high privilege prerequisite (PR:H), and specific attack conditions including specialized internal knowledge (AT:P). These constraints make opportunistic or automated exploitation implausible. However, the subsequent-system integrity impact of High (SI:H) is disproportionate to the composite score and deserves independent consideration - any system that makes trust decisions based on SGX attestation results is exposed to high-integrity compromise if attestation output is manipulated. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC evidence was present in the available intelligence, indicating no known active exploitation. The impact on the vulnerable system itself is limited (VI:L, VA:L), making this primarily a downstream trust-chain attack rather than a direct system compromise. Organizations operating confidential computing workloads where SGX attestation is the root of trust should treat this as a meaningful integrity risk even at a moderate composite score. CVSS 4.0 AT:P (attack requirements present) indicates that specific environmental conditions beyond just privilege must be met, further limiting realistic exploit scenarios. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A privileged insider or attacker who has already achieved kernel-level access on an SGX-enabled data center host, armed with specialized knowledge of DCAP internals, crafts inputs that exploit the security-relevant information omission, producing manipulated or incomplete attestation Quotes. A downstream cloud orchestrator or confidential workload broker that consumes those Quotes accepts the falsified trust evidence and admits an unauthorized or compromised workload, achieving high-integrity compromise of the relying system. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026
Intel Software Guard Extensions Data Center Attestation Primitives (SGX DCAP), operating at Ring 0 kernel privilege level, omits security-relevant information during attestation operations, enabling a privileged local attacker under high-complexity conditions to cause denial of service and high-integrity data alteration on downstream systems relying on attestation output. The SI:H subsequent-system integrity impact is the critical concern: systems that consume SGX attestation results - cloud orchestrators, confidential VM managers, or trust brokers - may accept manipulated evidence, undermining the core trust guarantees of confidential computing infrastructure. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis, and the PR:H and AC:H prerequisites substantially constrain the realistic attacker pool.
RemediationAI
Consult Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-01421 at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01421.html to obtain the specific patched version of Intel SGX DCAP - no fixed version number is identified in the available intelligence data, and version information must be sourced directly from Intel. Until patched, restrict kernel-level access to SGX DCAP interfaces to only the minimum set of authorized privileged accounts; given that PR:H is required for exploitation, enforcing strict administrative access controls substantially reduces exposure. Organizations using SGX attestation as a root-of-trust for critical workload admission decisions should consider implementing secondary attestation verification or out-of-band integrity checks until the patch is applied. Note that the high privilege and high complexity prerequisites mean urgency is significantly lower than for remotely exploitable vulnerabilities; however, confidential computing environments where attestation integrity is foundational should prioritize patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions) provides hardware-based Trusted Execution Environments called enclaves. The Data Center Attestation Primitives (DCAP) component operates at Ring 0 (kernel privilege level) and enables remote attestation - the mechanism by which relying parties cryptographically verify that software executes within a genuine SGX enclave on authenticated Intel hardware. CWE-223 (Omission of Security-relevant Information) identifies the root cause: the implementation fails to include or propagate critical security context during attestation processing, allowing security-relevant states to be silently omitted from attestation evidence or Quote structures. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_software_guard_extensions_data_center_attestation_primitives:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) uses a wildcard version, meaning all versions are nominally in scope pending the authoritative range defined by Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01421. The AT:P (attack requirements present) metric in the CVSS 4.0 vector explicitly calls out that 'special internal knowledge' of DCAP internals is required - a non-trivial prerequisite.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L
Local access and kernel privilege required per description; scope changes because SI:H downstream integrity impact propagates to attestation-relying systems.
Primary rating from Vendor (intel).
CVSS VectorVendor: intel
DescriptionCVE.org
Omission of security-relevant information for some Intel(R) Software Guard Extensions Data Center Attestation Primitives within Ring 0: Kernel may allow a denial of service. Authorized adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data alteration. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (low) impacts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2025-210693
GHSA-xqm6-x399-jg2r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB