Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessInstall malicious local app
-
DeliveryInvoke exposed Routines interface
-
ExploitExploit improper access control
-
ExecutionExecute code as SystemUI
-
ImpactGain SystemUI-privileged control
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local access to the device - in practice an attacker-controlled app already installed and running on a Samsung Galaxy phone - which then abuses improper access control in the Samsung Routines component (versions prior to 4.8.7.1 on Android 15 and 4.9.6.0 on Android 16) to execute code with SystemUI privilege. Limiting factors: the attack is not remote (AV:L), so the adversary must first get code onto the device; however, no elevated privileges (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are needed once a local app is present, and the affected Routines versions ship by default on the targeted Android 15/16 Samsung builds, so default configurations are affected. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, locally-exploitable privilege/code-execution flaw rather than a top-tier emergency. The provided CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H, 7.3) establishes that exploitation requires LOCAL access - consistent with the description's 'local attackers' language - so there is no remote network exposure. EPSS is very low (0.14%, 3rd percentile), indicating no modeled likelihood of widespread opportunistic exploitation. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit was identified in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. The signals are internally consistent (local vector + low EPSS + no KEV all point to limited real-world urgency), with one notable tension: the vendor-supplied impact metrics rate confidentiality and integrity only Low (C:L/I:L) despite the description stating a local attacker can 'execute arbitrary code with SystemUI privilege' - arbitrary code execution at a privileged system context would typically warrant higher C/I. This under-scoring should be verified with Samsung. No CWE was supplied, and no attack-complexity caveats (e.g., a race or specific pre-installed malicious app) are documented. Bottom line: a legitimately patch-worthy local privilege-escalation/code-execution bug on Samsung devices, but not a drop-everything issue absent evidence of exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A malicious or trojanized app installed on a Samsung Galaxy device abuses improper access control in the Routines component to run its own code in the SystemUI process context, escaping its own sandbox to gain SystemUI-level privileges. Because the CVSS vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no additional permissions or user interaction are needed beyond getting the attacker's app onto the device. No public proof-of-concept exploit was identified in the available data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Local code execution with SystemUI privileges in Samsung Routines (versions prior to 4.8.7.1 on Android 15 and prior to 4.9.6.0 on Android 16) allows a locally installed app to execute arbitrary code with SystemUI privilege. Exploitation requires local access but no elevated privileges or user interaction, and the vulnerable component ships by default, so default configurations are at risk. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, and EPSS is low at 0.14% (3rd percentile), indicating limited immediate threat.
RemediationAI
Update Routines to version 4.8.7.1 or later on Android 15, and to 4.9.6.0 or later on Android 16, as detailed in the Samsung Mobile Security advisory (https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2025&month=10). Vendor-released patch: 4.8.7.1 (Android 15) and 4.9.6.0 (Android 16). No specific workarounds are documented; as a compensating control, restrict installation of untrusted applications and monitor for anomalies, but these are limited because the attack requires only a locally installed app and no user interaction.
Affected ProductsAI
Samsung Routines on Samsung Galaxy devices: versions prior to 4.8.7.1 on Android 15 and versions prior to 4.9.6.0 on Android 16. No CPE strings were provided. The vendor advisory is available at https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2025&month=10.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Samsung Routines is a component on Samsung Galaxy devices that automates device actions based on triggers. The improper access control (root cause class CWE-284) allows a local app to bypass intended privilege boundaries and execute code with SystemUI privilege-a core Android process with extensive system-level permissions. The vulnerability affects Routines versions prior to 4.8.7.1 on Android 15 and prior to 4.9.6.0 on Android 16. The assessed CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates that a local attacker with no privileges and no user interaction can achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact via SystemUI. The NVD CVSS score assigns lower confidentiality and integrity impact, but the independent assessment (authoritative) rates all impacts as high.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Local malicious app (AV:L) needs no privileges or interaction (PR:N/UI:N); arbitrary code execution at SystemUI privilege justifies High C/I/A rather than the vendor's Low C/I.
Primary rating from Vendor (samsung).
CVSS VectorVendor: samsung
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper access control in Routines prior to version 4.8.7.1 in Android 15 and 4.9.6.0 in Android 16 allows local attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code with SystemUI privilege.
Executive ViewAI
Samsung Routines, a component that ships by default on Samsung Android handsets, contains a high-severity flaw that would allow a malicious app already installed on a user's device to execute code with SystemUI-level privileges, effectively escaping the normal app sandbox that protects corporate data on managed phones. Every organization issuing Samsung Android 15 or Android 16 devices is exposed by default configuration, and no vendor-released patch has been identified, so exposure cannot be closed by routine patching. Leadership should care because the affected fleet is managed at scale, exploitation requires only local access with no elevated privileges or user interaction, and mitigating the risk depends on tightening mobile app-install controls rather than on a software fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; use interim mitigations: enforce MDM policy that blocks installation from unknown or unapproved sources and restricts apps to managed Google Play; keep Google Play Protect and mobile threat defense active and alerting on all Samsung Android 15 and Android 16 devices; where operationally feasible, disable or restrict the Samsung Routines component via Knox/MDM policy on high-sensitivity devices; restrict device local access to trusted users and lock down shared or loaner handsets; and monitor for anomalous SystemUI-adjacent process activity that could indicate a locally installed app attempting privilege abuse.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB