Skip to main content

LibreOffice CVE-2025-14714

LOW
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel (CWE-288)
2025-12-15 security@documentfoundation.org
0.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: documentfoundation
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local low-privilege access to macOS host
  2. Exploit
    Invoke bundled Python interpreter inside LibreOffice.app
  3. Execution
    Interpreter inherits LibreOffice TCC grants
  4. Impact
    Scripts access TCC-protected resources

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Alternate path authentication
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires: (1) local access with the ability to execute binaries on a macOS host (AV:L); (2) an affected build - LibreOffice on macOS 25.2 before 25.2.4 (Linux/Windows unaffected); and (3) the critical attack requirement (AT:P) that the user has previously granted TCC permissions (e.g. Full Disk Access, Documents, camera, contacts) to the LibreOffice application bundle - if no TCC grants exist, there are no inherited privileges to abuse. The attacker gains only whatever TCC scope the user already approved for LibreOffice, nothing more. Limiting factors: no remote vector, attacker must already have local code-execution capability, and the payoff is bounded entirely by the user's existing TCC grants to the app.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the signals are consistent rather than conflicting. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 score is 0.9 (Low), driven by AV:L (local attack vector - the attacker must already be able to run code on the Mac), AT:P (a specific attack requirement: the user must have previously granted TCC permissions to the LibreOffice bundle), and PR:L (low privileges required). The only impact is SC:H - confidentiality of subsequent/other systems/resources protected by macOS TCC (e.g. files, contacts, camera) - with no integrity or availability impact (VI:N/VA:N) and no direct impact on the vulnerable component itself (VC:N). EPSS reinforces low real-world risk at 0.14% (3rd percentile). There is NO CISA KEV listing and NO public exploit - the CVSS exploit-maturity metric is explicitly E:U (unreported). All signals agree: this is a local privilege/permission-boundary weakness that is only meaningful to an attacker who already has local code execution on a Mac where the user granted TCC permissions to LibreOffice. It is correctly a low-CVSS, low-real-risk issue, not an urgent priority. Note the CWE-288 (authentication bypass) framing is slightly generous - functionally this is a TCC permission-inheritance / confused-deputy problem rather than a classic auth bypass.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with local, low-privilege access to a macOS host running an affected LibreOffice version directly invokes the Python interpreter bundled inside the LibreOffice.app bundle. Because that interpreter inherits the TCC permissions the user granted to LibreOffice, the attacker's scripts gain access to TCC-protected resources (such as files, contacts, or camera) that their own process would otherwise be denied. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026

LibreOffice on macOS 25.2 up to (but not including) 25.2.4 bundles a Python interpreter that inherits the Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) permissions the user previously granted to the LibreOffice application bundle, so an attacker who can already execute binaries locally can launch that interpreter directly and run scripts under the application's TCC privileges - for example the same Full Disk Access, Documents, contacts, or camera scope the user approved for LibreOffice. The payoff is bounded entirely by pre-existing TCC grants: if the user never granted LibreOffice any sensitive TCC scope, there is nothing to inherit, which is why the vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector carries Attack Requirements: Present and scores only 0.9, and our independent assessment rates this as a genuinely low-priority, locally-scoped confidentiality issue (CVSS 3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N), with no integrity or availability impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing; EPSS is 0.14% (3rd percentile), so exploitation is not observed in the wild. Linux and Windows builds of LibreOffice are unaffected.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: LibreOffice 25.2.4 or later for macOS, which applies parent constraints that allow only the main application bundle to launch the interpreter with TCC-attributed privileges. Upgrading is the only complete fix and the only mitigation that preserves normal functionality; verify the installed build in LibreOffice under About LibreOffice and confirm the version is 25.2.4 or higher, referring to the advisory at https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2025-14714 for the vendor's exact guidance. Until upgrading is possible, the effective compensating control is to reduce the privilege surface the bug can inherit: open System Settings > Privacy & Security and revoke LibreOffice from any granted categories (Full Disk Access, Files and Folders, Contacts, Camera, Microphone, Accessibility), which removes the attacker's payoff entirely - the trade-off is that legitimate LibreOffice features that depend on those permissions will stop working until re-granted for the patched build. Because the attack requires an attacker to already execute code locally, hardening standard local-access controls (unique per-user accounts, no untrusted users or processes with execution rights on the workstation, macOS Gatekeeper and app-notarization enforcement) is complementary but not a substitute for the patch. Do not rely on signature verification of downloaded installers as a mitigation for this issue, since the vulnerable interpreter is inside the already-trusted bundle; no public exploit code has been identified, so no detection-specific IOCs are available, and monitoring should instead focus on unexpected child processes launched from inside the LibreOffice application bundle.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

On macOS, TCC (Transparency, Consent, and Control) is the system privacy framework that gates access to protected resources such as Documents, Desktop, Downloads, Full Disk Access, camera, microphone, and contacts. TCC grants are attributed to a signed application bundle rather than to the individual executable process, and macOS decides which bundle is 'responsible' for a child process using code-signing and parent-process attribution. LibreOffice's macOS build ships an embedded Python interpreter inside the application bundle; when that interpreter is executed directly, macOS attributes it to the LibreOffice bundle, which had already been granted privileges by the user, so the process effectively inherits the application's approved TCC scope. This is CWE-288 (Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel): the interpreter offers an alternate execution path that reaches the privileged state without going through the intended gated entry point. The upstream fix introduces parent constraints so that the bundled interpreter is only permitted to run with the application's TCC attribution when launched by the main application, closing the alternate path. The attack is local-only (the CVSS 4.0 vector is AV:L with PR:L and AT:P) and requires the attacker to already hold the ability to execute binaries on the host plus the precondition that the user granted LibreOffice meaningful TCC permissions; the leaked capability is exactly that previously approved scope, nothing broader.

Know when Python gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (documentfoundation) PRIMARY 0.9 LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Local vector and existing low-priv code execution (AV:L/PR:L); scope changes to macOS TCC-protected resources (S:C, C:H); no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (documentfoundation).

CVSS VectorVendor: documentfoundation

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

An Authentication Bypass vulnerability existed where the application bundled an interpreter (Python) that inherits the Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) permissions granted by the user to the main application bundle

By executing the bundled interpreter directly the attacker's scripts run with the application's TCC privileges

In fixed versions parent-constraints are used to allow only the main application to launch interpreter with those permissions

This issue affects LibreOffice on macOS: from 25.2 before < 25.2.4.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 97% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular free office suite but only the macOS build is affected
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

4
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +4
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

More in Python

View all
CVE-2025-24016 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Feb 10

Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t

CVE-2025-27520 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 04

BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser

CVE-2025-2945 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Apr 03

pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi

CVE-2013-5093 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Sep 27

The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python

CVE-2025-32375 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 09

BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2024-21644 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 08

pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.

CVE-2026-33017 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 17

Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301

CVE-2017-9462 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 06

In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse

CVE-2026-49869 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 26

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Kestra OSS (the open-source event-driven orchestration platform) prior to

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2024-21645 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jan 08

pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy