Skip to main content

Picotcp CVE-2020-17444

HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2020-12-11 cve@mitre.org
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Impact

CVSS score of 7.5 (HIGH). Attack characteristics: network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction not required.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

This vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network. Successful exploitation could compromise the high-severity affected system.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 2.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAI

An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.

RemediationAI

No vendor patch is available at time of analysis. Monitor vendor advisories for updates. Apply vendor patches when available. Implement network segmentation and monitoring as interim mitigations.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-20. An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The routine for processing the next header field (and deducing whether the IPv6 extension headers are valid) doesn't check whether the header extension length field would overflow. Therefore, if it wraps around to zero, iterating through the extension headers will not increment the current data pointer. This leads to an infinite loop and Denial-of-Service in pico_ipv6_check_headers_sequence() in pico_ipv6.c. Affected products include: Altran Picotcp.

Know when Picotcp gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionNVD

An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The routine for processing the next header field (and deducing whether the IPv6 extension headers are valid) doesn't check whether the header extension length field would overflow. Therefore, if it wraps around to zero, iterating through the extension headers will not increment the current data pointer. This leads to an infinite loop and Denial-of-Service in pico_ipv6_check_headers_sequence() in pico_ipv6.c.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
2.8%
Top 15% exploitable
Data Quality
2 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 2.8%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +3
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Affected Products (CPE)NVD

cpe:2.3:a:altran:picotcp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2023-30463 HIGH POC
7.5 Apr 19

Altran picoTCP through 1.7.0 allows memory corruption (and subsequent denial of service) because of an integer overflow

CVE-2017-1000210 CRITICAL
9.8 Nov 17

picoTCP (versions 1.7.0 - 1.5.0) is vulnerable to stack buffer overflow resulting in code execution or denial of service

CVE-2020-24338 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 11

An issue was discovered in picoTCP through 1.7.0. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exp

CVE-2020-24341 CRITICAL
9.1 Dec 11

An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.1), this vulnerability

CVE-2020-17441 CRITICAL
9.1 Dec 11

An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.1), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable

CVE-2023-35849 HIGH
7.5 Jun 19

VirtualSquare picoTCP (aka PicoTCP-NG) through 2.1 does not properly check whether header sizes would result in accessin

CVE-2023-35848 HIGH
7.5 Jun 19

VirtualSquare picoTCP (aka PicoTCP-NG) through 2.1 lacks certain size calculations before attempting to set a value of a

CVE-2023-35847 HIGH
7.5 Jun 19

VirtualSquare picoTCP (aka PicoTCP-NG) through 2.1 does not have an MSS lower bound (e.g., it could be zero). Rated high

CVE-2023-35846 HIGH
7.5 Jun 19

VirtualSquare picoTCP (aka PicoTCP-NG) through 2.1 does not check the transport layer length in a frame before performin

CVE-2020-24340 HIGH
7.5 Dec 11

An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is r

CVE-2020-24339 HIGH
7.5 Dec 11

An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is r

CVE-2020-24337 HIGH
7.5 Dec 11

An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy