Remote Code Execution

Path-traversal remote code execution in PraisonAI (mervinpraison/praisonai) before 1.6.78 lets an authenticated agent user abuse SkillTools.run_skill_script(), which executes skill scripts without validating that the supplied path stays inside the intended working directory. Because absolute file paths are accepted, a low-privileged attacker can point the skill runner at any executable script on the host and run it. No public exploit code has been identified and it is not in CISA KEV, but the flaw was reported by VulnCheck and a GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-c44f-37qr-gw3f) confirms the fix.

OS command execution in PraisonAI before 4.6.78 lets an attacker who can supply a workflow definition escape the inline-Python sandbox and run arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the agent process. The flaw lives in JobWorkflowExecutor._exec_inline_python(), whose AST-based validation fails to reject `import os` followed by `os.system()`, turning a malicious YAML workflow file into RCE. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing is identified at time of analysis, though the bypass technique is described in detail in the vendor advisory.

Code injection in PraisonAI before 4.6.78 lets attackers who control deployment configuration achieve arbitrary Python execution because the API-server deployment generator fails to safely encode the deploy.api.host and agents_file values before emitting them into generated Python source (CWE-94). Injected expressions run when the generated API server starts or handles requests, yielding full code execution in the server process. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis; the flaw was reported by VulnCheck and a vendor patch is available.

Stored server-side template injection in Grav's bundled Flex Objects plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-flex-objects) before 1.4.0 lets a low-privileged content author inject Twig code through the dynamic collection/object title frontmatter, which is passed unsanitized to template_from_string() and executed. Because the title path bypasses Grav's Security::cleanDangerousTwig() filter, an attacker can reach internal Grav services such as the scheduler and escalate arbitrary Twig evaluation to full remote command execution. Reported by VulnCheck with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 (High); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Remote code execution in Open WebUI (self-hosted LLM interface) before the fixed 0.3.33 release allows attackers to hijack an authenticated admin session through a CORS misconfiguration. When an instance is deployed with allow_origins=* and an authenticated admin visits an attacker-controlled website, the malicious page can issue authenticated cross-origin requests to the /api/v1/functions endpoint and register attacker-supplied Python code, achieving code execution - and because the container runs as root by default, full container compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not on CISA KEV, but the flaw is documented in a GitHub Security Lab advisory (GHSL-2024-174/175) and reported by VulnCheck.

Arbitrary code execution in the HYPER SBI 2 installer (SBI Securities' online trading application) allows a local attacker to run code with the invoking user's privileges by planting a crafted DLL in the installer's directory. The flaw stems from insecure DLL search-path loading (CWE-427) and requires the victim to launch the installer from an attacker-influenced folder. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; the issue was reported by JPCERT/CC and published via JVN.

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitrary `command` and `args` values in the server-creation JSON, which LiteLLM passes to the host OS without validation, yielding remote code execution as the LiteLLM process. The flaw is part of the broader MCP-stdio supply-chain advisory disclosed by ox.security across the AI ecosystem and is documented in LiteLLM's own April 2026 advisory. No public exploit is identified in the provided data, and EPSS is low (0.32%, 24th percentile), so widespread automated exploitation is not currently indicated despite the CVSS 9.8 rating.

Heap-based buffer overflow in 7-Zip's XZ archive parser enables arbitrary code execution when a victim opens a crafted archive on 7-Zip 26.01 and earlier; fixed in 7-Zip 26.02. Reported by Landon Peng of Lunbun LLC through the Zero Day Initiative, this flaw carries full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact at the process level. A public POC is confirmed available via the Italian ACN portal, though EPSS sits at only 0.92% (57th percentile) and no CISA KEV listing exists, indicating targeted rather than widespread exploitation at time of analysis.

Remote code execution in xszyou Fay 4.3.1 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker reach the publicly exposed MCP (Model Context Protocol) management interface and register an MCP STDIO server with attacker-chosen commands, which the service then executes on the host. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) reflecting network-reachable, no-authentication, low-complexity exploitation. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS is modest at 0.61% (45th percentile), and this CVE is part of a broader MCP-ecosystem supply-chain advisory published by ox.security.

Heap out-of-bounds read/write in OpenHTJ2K (High-Throughput JPEG 2000 reference codec) v0.18.4 and earlier lets an attacker corrupt heap memory by supplying a crafted J2K/JP2 codestream, with a confirmed heap information-leak primitive and vendor-claimed arbitrary code execution. The flaw is reached through every decoder entry point (invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, invoke_line_based_predecoded) and, notably, through a JPIP server's startup codestream load, making it network-reachable without user interaction. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the vendor changelog references non-public PoC files, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in OpenHTJ2K (an open-source High Throughput JPEG 2000 codec by osamu620) versions 0.18.4 and earlier stems from an unchecked coding-pass counter overflowing the fixed pass_length[128] array while parsing crafted JPEG 2000 packet headers. An attacker who supplies a malicious J2K/HTJ2K image to an application built on the library can corrupt adjacent memory and potentially execute code. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS is low (0.20%) and CISA SSVC rates current exploitation as none, though technical impact is total and the flaw is automatable.

Local privilege escalation in Pi-hole 6.0.0 through 6.4.2 lets an attacker who already has code execution as the unprivileged pihole user become root by overwriting the /etc/pihole/logrotate configuration file. Because pihole-FTL-prestart.sh chowns that file to root:root and the daily flush cron then parses it as root via logrotate, a malicious firstaction shell directive runs as uid 0. This is a CWE-282 improper ownership issue with total technical impact; SSVC lists exploitation as proof-of-concept and it is fixed in 6.4.3, with no CISA KEV listing and a low EPSS of 0.22%.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Illustrator Desktop (2025 versions ≤29.8.7 and 2026 versions ≤30.5) allows an attacker to run code in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file. The flaw is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered during file parsing and requires user interaction, so it is not remotely exploitable without victim action. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no CISA KEV listing, and EPSS is low (0.14%, 4th percentile), indicating no evidence of active exploitation.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Illustrator Desktop (2025 versions ≤29.8.7 and 2026 versions ≤30.5) stems from an out-of-bounds write when parsing a maliciously crafted file, letting an attacker run code in the context of the current user. Exploitation requires the victim to open a booby-trapped file, so it is a file-format/client-side attack rather than a remotely reachable service flaw. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis (SSVC exploitation: none), and EPSS is low at 0.14% (4th percentile).

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Illustrator Desktop (2025 versions ≤29.8.7 and 2026 versions ≤30.5) allows a remote attacker to run code in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file. The flaw is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) with total technical impact per CISA SSVC, but no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.14%, 4th percentile). Exploitation hinges on user interaction, so it is a file-delivery/social-engineering vector rather than a remotely automatable one.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Illustrator 2025 (≤29.8.7) and 2026 (≤30.5) allows an attacker to run code in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file. The flaw stems from improper input validation (CWE-20) during file parsing and carries a scope-changed CVSS of 9.3, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low at 0.39% (31st percentile). CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none with total technical impact, indicating high potential damage but no observed weaponization.

Server-Side Request Forgery in Adobe's C2PA (Content Credentials) SDK family - the Rust SDK (c2pa), the Node.js web SDK (c2pa-web), and the c2patool CLI - can escalate to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. When an application built on these libraries validates a maliciously crafted asset or URL, the SSRF is chained into script injection to hijack the victim's session or account. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS score is low (0.18%, 7th percentile), consistent with CISA SSVC rating exploitation as 'none'.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe's Content Authenticity (CAI) Content Credentials tooling — the c2pa Rust SDK (≤0.84.0), the @contentauth/c2pa-web JS SDK (≤0.7.0), and the c2patool CLI (≤0.16.5) — arises from an untrusted search path (CWE-426) that loads attacker-controlled libraries and runs code as the current user. Adobe PSIRT reports the flaw requires victim interaction (visiting a crafted URL or interacting with a compromised page) and a local attack vector, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. EPSS is low (0.14%, 4th percentile) and CISA SSVC records exploitation as 'none', consistent with a not-yet-exploited but total-technical-impact issue.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Illustrator Desktop (2026 versions ≤30.5 and 2025 versions ≤29.8.7) allows an attacker to run code in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file that abuses an untrusted search path (CWE-426). The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.6 with a changed scope, but exploitation is local and requires user interaction. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.16%, 5th percentile), and CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none.

Arbitrary Groovy code execution in the jadx Dex-to-Java decompiler (prior to 1.5.6) allows a malicious APK to run attacker-controlled code on the analyst's machine. When jadx exports a decompiled APK as an Android Gradle project, it copies the android:versionName value from AndroidManifest.xml into the generated build.gradle Groovy template without sanitization, letting a crafted value break out of the string literal and inject code that executes when the victim opens or builds the exported project. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS risk is low (0.15%, 5th percentile) and CISA SSVC records exploitation as none, but the technical impact is total.

Remote code execution in Aetopia Digital Asset Management (DAM) v1.0.0 is achievable through a server-side template injection flaw: attacker-controlled input in the 'name' and 'description' parameters of the Add/Update Project function is evaluated by the server-side template engine, letting an attacker run arbitrary code on the host. NVD scores this CVSS 9.8 (network, low complexity, no privileges required), and a public researcher writeup detailing the SSTI exists on the eslam3kl GitBook; however, there is no public exploit identified as weaponized code and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so it is not confirmed as actively exploited. Note the CVSS PR:N rating conflicts with the fact that Add/Update Project is normally an authenticated application feature.

Arbitrary code execution in andreimarcu linx-server (a self-hosted file/media sharing service) versions 1.0 through 2.3.8 can be triggered by a remote attacker abusing a Cross-Site Request Forgery flaw in the uploadPutHandler function, per NVD and MITRE. Because the upload endpoint lacks anti-CSRF protection, an attacker can forge upload requests that ride an authenticated victim's session to achieve code execution. No public exploit has been identified in the provided data, though a third-party vulnerability report is referenced; the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS score was supplied.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe ColdFusion allows an attacker with low-privileged access on an adjacent network to bypass authorization controls (CWE-863) and run code in the context of the current user, with a scope change that lets the impact extend beyond the vulnerable component. Adobe PSIRT reported the flaw and published advisory APSB26-82; it is tagged as RCE and authentication bypass with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.0. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the incorrect-authorization-to-RCE pattern in ColdFusion has historically drawn rapid attacker interest.

Missing authentication in Adobe ColdFusion allows an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network to trigger arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, without any user interaction. The flaw (CWE-306) bypasses authentication on a critical function and carries a scope change, meaning the impact reaches beyond the vulnerable component. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the issue was reported by Adobe PSIRT and addressed in advisory APSB26-82.

SQL injection in Adobe ColdFusion 2023 and 2025 lets an attacker with high privileges inject crafted SQL that escalates to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, with a changed scope that extends impact beyond the vulnerable component. The flaw (CWE-89, CVSS 9.1) affects ColdFusion 2023 through Update 21 and ColdFusion 2025 through Update 10, requires no user interaction, and was disclosed by Adobe PSIRT. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is modest at 0.69% (49th percentile).

Code injection (CWE-94) in Adobe ColdFusion 2023 (Update 21 and earlier) and ColdFusion 2025 (Update 10 and earlier) allows a low-privileged, network-adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user without any user interaction. Because the CVSS scope is changed, successful exploitation can extend impact beyond the vulnerable component to the underlying host. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the EPSS probability is low (0.43%, 35th percentile), but the near-maximum CVSS of 9.9 and Adobe's own PSIRT reporting make this a high-priority patch.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe ColdFusion 2023 (through Update 21) and ColdFusion 2025 (through Update 10) arises from a path traversal weakness that lets an authenticated attacker with high privileges escape a restricted directory and run code in the context of the current user. Because the CVSS scope is changed (S:C), successful exploitation can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component, and CISA's SSVC rates the technical impact as total. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS probability is low (0.93%), indicating no evidence of widespread automated exploitation yet.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe ColdFusion 2023 (through Update 21) and ColdFusion 2025 (through Update 10) allows an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network to run code in the context of the current user via improper input validation, with no user interaction required and a scope change extending impact beyond the vulnerable component. Adobe (APSB26-82) rates it CVSS 9.6; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC framework reports exploitation status 'none'. EPSS estimates a 2.17% 30-day exploitation probability (80th percentile), notable but not extreme for a critical-rated ColdFusion RCE.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Bridge allows an attacker to run code in the context of the current user by tricking a victim into opening a maliciously crafted file that triggers an untrusted pointer dereference (CWE-822). The flaw is local and file-based, requiring user interaction; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation yields full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability limited to the privileges of the user running Bridge.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Bridge is possible through an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file, running attacker code in the context of the current user. All versions covered by Adobe advisory APSB26-81 are affected, and while there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the local user-interaction attack pattern is consistent with weaponized document/asset lures. The CVSS 7.8 (High) rating reflects full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once a victim is socially engineered into opening the file.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Bridge is possible when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122), letting an attacker run code in the context of the current user. The flaw was reported by Adobe and disclosed in advisory APSB26-81; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation is file-borne and requires user interaction, so it is not remotely triggerable without a user opening attacker-supplied content.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Bridge results from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that a victim triggers by opening a malicious file, running attacker-supplied code with the privileges of the current user. The flaw is local (AV:L) and requires user interaction, so it is a client-side, file-borne bug rather than a remotely reachable service vulnerability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV; Adobe patched it in advisory APSB26-81.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Bridge arises from an integer overflow (CWE-190) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file, allowing an attacker to run code in the context of the current user. The flaw is local and requires user interaction, carrying a CVSS 7.8 (High) score. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Bridge is possible when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file, triggering an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that executes attacker-controlled code in the context of the current user. The flaw affects Adobe Bridge as reported by Adobe (advisory APSB26-81) and is rated CVSS 7.8; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation is local and hinges entirely on user interaction - the victim must open the malicious file.

Local arbitrary code execution in Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop lets a low-privileged user run code in the context of the current user by exploiting an uncontrolled search path (CWE-427) — the class of flaw where an application loads a library or executable from an attacker-influenced directory. Adobe (CVE-2026-48272) rates it CVSS 7.8, but the vector is local with high attack complexity and requires existing low-level privileges, and exploitation depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so this is a defense-in-depth patch rather than an emergency.

Local privilege escalation to arbitrary code execution affects the Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop application through a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition, letting a low-privileged local attacker execute code and - because the CVSS scope is changed - impact resources beyond the initial security context. No user interaction is required, but the race is hard to win: exploitation depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control, reflected in the high attack complexity. At time of analysis there is no public exploit identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

Code execution in NVIDIA TensorRT is possible when the SDK processes a maliciously crafted input that overflows a heap-based buffer (CWE-122), corrupting adjacent heap memory. The flaw affects the TensorRT deep-learning inference library and requires a local user to load attacker-supplied content, per the AV:L/UI:R CVSS vector; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Successful exploitation yields full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) in the context of the process running the inference job.

Local code execution in NVIDIA TensorRT is possible when the library parses an attacker-supplied input (such as a crafted model/engine file), triggering a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) that can corrupt memory and lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the process using TensorRT. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/UI:R) indicates the attacker needs local access and must induce a user or application to load malicious content, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. TensorRT is NVIDIA's deep-learning inference SDK, so the affected population is developers, MLOps pipelines, and inference servers that load third-party or untrusted models.

Improper array index validation (CWE-129) in NVIDIA TensorRT allows an attacker to trigger out-of-bounds memory access that may lead to arbitrary code execution when a victim processes malicious input on the local host. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/UI:R) indicates the target must actively load attacker-controlled content, so exploitation hinges on tricking a user or automated pipeline into ingesting a crafted model or input file. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, but with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact this is a meaningful priority for AI/ML inference environments.

Code execution in NVIDIA TensorRT (all versions through v10.16.1) arises from unsafe deserialization of untrusted data (CWE-502), letting an attacker who supplies a malicious serialized artifact run arbitrary code in the context of the inference process. It affects the TensorRT SDK/runtime used to optimize and execute deep-learning models. The vendor-assigned CVSS is 9.8, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.48%, 38th percentile), and CISA SSVC lists exploitation as 'none'.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's V8 JavaScript engine (versions prior to 150.0.7871.125) allows a remote attacker to run arbitrary code within the renderer sandbox when a victim visits a crafted HTML page. Rated High by Chromium and CVSS 8.8, the flaw is a type-confusion class issue in V8 requiring only that the user browse to attacker-controlled content. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.34%), but Chrome's ubiquity and the total technical impact make patching urgent.

Renderer-side arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome for Windows (versions prior to 150.0.7871.125) stems from a heap buffer overflow in the bundled libyuv video color-conversion library, letting a remote attacker who lures a victim into loading a crafted video file run code within the renderer sandbox. Chromium rates the severity High; the flaw was reported internally by the Chrome team and a fixed stable build is available. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low (0.33%, 25th percentile), consistent with SSVC exploitation status 'none'.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe After Effects arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that runs in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted project or media file. Adobe (via advisory APSB26-78) confirms the flaw; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. The 7.8 CVSS reflects high impact tempered by the local vector and required user interaction.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe After Effects arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted project or media file, running attacker code with the privileges of the current user. Adobe self-reported the flaw in advisory APSB26-78; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. The CVSS 7.8 (High) rating reflects high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact but is gated by required user interaction and local file delivery.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Premiere Pro is possible via a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted project or media file, running attacker code in the context of the current user. The flaw is local and requires user interaction, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis; Adobe self-reported it in advisory APSB26-76. CVSS 7.8 reflects high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact but a local attack vector gated by the user opening a malicious file.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Premiere Pro via an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that lets an attacker run code in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted project or media file. The flaw is memory-corruption based and file-driven, requiring user interaction rather than network exposure; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. EPSS data was not provided, but the local, user-interaction-gated vector places this in the file-format/client-side attack category typical of Adobe desktop products.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Premiere Pro is possible when a victim opens a maliciously crafted project or media file, triggering an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that runs attacker code in the context of the current user. The flaw was reported by Adobe (advisory APSB26-76) and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 (local vector, requires user interaction). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so risk is currently driven by the ease of social-engineering a user into opening a booby-trapped file.

Local privilege-context deserialization in NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM lets an attacker who already has same-user access to a host running the inference stack abuse its inter-process communication layer to trigger unsafe object deserialization (CWE-502), potentially yielding code execution, information disclosure, data tampering, and denial of service. The flaw is vendor-reported by NVIDIA and carries a CVSS 3.1 base of 7.8 (AV:L), meaning it is not remotely reachable but converts existing local access into full compromise of the model-serving process. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Insecure deserialization in NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM for Linux lets a local, low-privileged attacker abuse a weakness in the restricted unpickler that handles model-weight loading, potentially achieving code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure. The flaw (CWE-502, CVSS 8.4) affects the GPU LLM-inference library and stems from the restricted unpickler failing to fully constrain what can be deserialized from an untrusted model artifact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Media Encoder arises from a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media file, allowing an attacker to run code in the context of the current user. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.8 (local vector, user interaction required, no privileges needed). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so risk is file-delivery-driven rather than remotely wormable.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Media Encoder is possible through an out-of-bounds write triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media file, running attacker code in the context of the current user. The flaw was reported by Adobe and is addressed in advisory APSB26-72; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation hinges on user interaction (opening the file) and yields high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Media Encoder is possible when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media file, triggering an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that runs attacker code in the context of the current user. The flaw is local and requires user interaction, so it is not remotely wormable, but successful exploitation grants full compromise of the user's session. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV; Adobe published advisory APSB26-72 addressing the issue.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Media Encoder arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) that lets a crafted media file corrupt memory and run attacker-controlled code in the context of the current user. Any user who opens a malicious file in the affected desktop application is at risk, with full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the host. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Animate 2023 and 2024 arises from an untrusted search path (CWE-426) flaw that lets a malicious file, when opened by a victim, load attacker-controlled code in the context of the current user. The issue was reported by Adobe (advisory APSB26-83), requires user interaction, and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.9 with a changed scope. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Animate 2023 and 2024 allows an attacker to run commands in the context of the current user via an OS command injection flaw (CWE-78) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file. The scope-changed CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 reflects that successful exploitation can affect resources beyond the vulnerable application. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; the primary risk gate is social-engineering the victim into opening a hostile document.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Animate 2023 and 2024 allows an attacker to run OS commands in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file. The flaw is an OS command injection (CWE-78) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no active exploitation reported in CISA KEV; risk hinges on social-engineering a user into opening the file. Adobe published fixes in advisory APSB26-83.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Animate 2023 and 2024 stems from an incorrect authorization (CWE-863) weakness that lets code run in the context of the current user. Adobe reported the flaw via advisory APSB26-83 with a CVSS 8.1 rating; exploitation requires no user interaction but depends on conditions outside the attacker's control (reflected in high attack complexity). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Animate 2023 and 2024 arises from an Incorrect Authorization flaw (CWE-863) that lets a maliciously crafted file run code in the context of the current user. Exploitation requires the victim to open the attacker-supplied file and depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Adobe self-reported the issue and published fixes in advisory APSB26-83.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Animate 2023 and 2024 stems from a path traversal weakness triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted file, letting an attacker run code in the context of the current user and reach files or directories outside intended restrictions. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.6 with a changed scope, reflecting impact beyond the initially vulnerable component. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so exploitation risk hinges on social-engineering a user into opening a rogue project file.

Stored cross-site scripting in EasyAdminBundle (Symfony admin generator) versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.12 allows a lower-privileged user with access to a form using FileField or ImageField to upload a browser-executable .html or .svg file that EasyAdmin then links to inline, executing attacker-controlled JavaScript in a viewing administrator's authenticated session. Impact includes session/CSRF-token theft and privilege escalation; it is explicitly NOT remote code execution because filenames come from Symfony's guessExtension(). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV; a vendor patch is available in 5.0.13.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2B, Magento Open Source, and the Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin stems from improper output encoding/escaping (CWE-116) and lets a high-privileged attacker run code in the context of the current user with no user interaction. Because the scope is changed, exploitation can affect components beyond the initially vulnerable one, and Adobe rates it CVSS 9.1. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, it is not in CISA KEV, and EPSS is low (0.90%, 56th percentile), so risk is currently theoretical/targeted rather than mass-exploited.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Commerce, Magento Open Source, Adobe Commerce B2B, and the Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin lets a remote attacker run script in the context of a victim's authenticated session by abusing an unrestricted file-upload flaw (CWE-434). Because the impact executes in the current user's browser/session context and requires the victim to visit a crafted URL or compromised page, the outcome is account/session takeover and privilege escalation rather than direct server compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV, but the EPSS score of 28.32% (98th percentile) signals meaningfully elevated exploitation likelihood for a newly disclosed flaw.

SQL injection in Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2B, Magento Open Source, and the Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin allows a high-privileged authenticated attacker to inject malicious SQL that can escalate to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, enabling account/session takeover. The flaw (CWE-89) is network-reachable and requires no user interaction, but demands existing high privileges per the CVSS PR:H metric. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV; EPSS was not provided.

Post-authentication OS command execution in the SonicWall SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) allows a remote attacker holding administrator credentials to inject and run arbitrary operating-system commands on the appliance under specific conditions. It affects SMA1000 firmware branches 12.4.3 and 12.5.0, is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV), and has publicly available exploit code, though the EPSS probability sits at a moderate 1.65% (74th percentile), consistent with targeted rather than mass exploitation. Successful abuse yields total control of the management plane of an internet-facing remote-access appliance.

Arbitrary file write in yutu, a Go-based YouTube CLI and MCP server, lets any caller of the built-in `caption-download` MCP tool place attacker-controlled bytes at any filesystem path the yutu process can write to. The vulnerable `Caption.Download()` calls `os.Create()` on the caller-supplied `file` parameter, bypassing the `YUTU_ROOT` (`pkg.Root`/`os.OpenRoot`) confinement that every other caption write path enforces. Publicly available exploit code exists (a self-contained Docker PoC ships with the advisory); the flaw is not in CISA KEV and no active exploitation is reported, and the vendor has released a fixed version (0.10.9-dev1).

Arbitrary file upload in the Podlove Podcast Publisher WordPress plugin (all versions through 4.5.1) allows remote attackers to place attacker-controlled files on the server via the image caching path, potentially escalating to remote code execution. The root cause is incomplete file-type validation in the plugin's image cache handling, where a cached file's extension was trusted rather than re-derived from the actual validated image type. Reported by Wordfence and fixed upstream; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.

Local privilege elevation in Microsoft .NET Framework (and .NET 8.0/9.0 plus Visual Studio 2022/2026) via code injection (CWE-94) that lets an unauthorized attacker run code with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact after a victim is tricked into interacting with attacker-supplied content. Microsoft reported the issue and has shipped a patch; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation requires local access and user interaction (UI:R), which meaningfully limits mass-exploitation despite the high 7.8 CVSS score.

Server-Side Request Forgery in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM as a Cloud Service, 6.5 LTS, and 6.5) lets a low-privileged, authenticated attacker coerce the server into issuing crafted requests that can escalate to arbitrary code execution in the current user's context and hijack the victim's account or session. The scope-changed CVSS 9.6 rating reflects that the SSRF pivots beyond the vulnerable component itself. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no CISA KEV listing; risk is driven by CVSS severity and Adobe's confirmation via advisory APSB26-74 rather than observed exploitation.

Sensitive file disclosure and potential account takeover in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM as a Cloud Service, 6.5, and 6.5 LTS) arises from unsafe XML External Entity (XXE) processing that Adobe classifies as leading to arbitrary code execution in the current user's context. A low-privileged, authenticated attacker (PR:L) can trigger the flaw remotely over the network with no user interaction, reading protected files and pivoting to elevated access or session control. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the 9.6 CVSS score and scope-change make it a high-priority patch.

Arbitrary file write in Anyquery Server Mode (versions < 0.4.5) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to write files to any path the process can access by abusing SQLite's native ATTACH DATABASE command exposed over the MySQL-compatible listener. Because the server blindly proxies SQL to the underlying SQLite engine, an attacker can create files such as cron jobs, PHP web shells, or SSH authorized_keys and escalate the file write into remote code execution or denial of service. A working step-by-step proof-of-concept is published in the vendor's GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx); there is no CISA KEV entry and no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation at time of analysis.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Audition arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media/project file, allowing an attacker to run code in the context of the current user. The flaw is Adobe-reported (advisory APSB26-71) and carries a CVSS 7.8 (High) rating; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Because exploitation is local and requires user interaction, weaponization depends on social engineering rather than remote automated attack.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Audition arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media/project file, letting an attacker run code with the privileges of the current user. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.8 (local vector, requires user interaction), and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Reported by Adobe via advisory APSB26-71.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Audition arises from an out-of-bounds write (memory corruption) that runs in the context of the current user when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media/project file. All affected versions covered by Adobe advisory APSB26-71 are impacted, and while no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, the local attack vector with required user interaction makes it a classic file-format weaponization risk. The CVSS 7.8 (High) reflects full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once the file is opened.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Audition arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered when a victim opens a maliciously crafted media/project file, letting an attacker run code in the context of the current user. The flaw was reported by Adobe and is documented in advisory APSB26-71; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Because exploitation is local and requires user interaction, it is a file-format/client-side memory-corruption issue rather than a remotely-triggerable server flaw.

Arbitrary code execution in Adobe Audition arises from an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) triggered when a user opens a maliciously crafted media/project file, letting an attacker run code with the privileges of the current user. Affects Adobe Audition and was reported by Adobe under advisory APSB26-71. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV; EPSS not provided.

Stored CSV formula injection in FacturaScripts (all versions through 2026.1) lets an authenticated low-privilege user plant spreadsheet formula payloads in ordinary text fields (customer/supplier/product names, contacts) that execute when an administrator opens a routine list export. Because Core/Lib/Export/CSVExport.php::writeData() wraps values without neutralising leading =,+,-,@,tab, or carriage-return characters, and Tools::noHtml() only strips HTML metacharacters, the payload reaches the CSV verbatim and Excel/LibreOffice run it (including DDE process spawning) in the admin's OS context. A live PoC was verified on 2026-04-30, so publicly available exploit code exists, though there is no active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV).

Unauthenticated arbitrary file read in FacturaScripts (all versions through v2026.2) lets remote attackers retrieve protected documents by abusing the static file controllers Files.php and Myfiles.php, which authorize requests on the raw URL prefix rather than the resolved filesystem path. A request such as /Plugins/../MyFiles/Private/invoice.pdf passes the prefix allow-list yet resolves to a private file, leaking customer/supplier invoices, attachments, and .sql database backups. A detailed, reproducible exploit is publicly available in the GitHub Security Advisory; there is no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation.

Cross-resource SQL injection in the FacturaScripts REST API (all versions through 2026.1) lets a low-privileged, scoped ApiKey read or modify arbitrary database tables via the `filter` query parameter, enabling full admin account takeover. A single GET request with a parenthesized filter key leaks the admin's bcrypt password hash and `logkey` session token, which are then replayed as the `fsLogkey` cookie to reach admin-only endpoints like `/AdminPlugins`. A live end-to-end PoC was verified on 2026-04-30, so publicly available exploit code exists, though there is no public exploit identified as being used in active attacks (not in CISA KEV).

OS command injection in the TP-Link Archer VX1800v (v1) router lets an adjacent, high-privileged attacker inject shell metacharacters through the domain name parameter of an HTTP management interface, yielding arbitrary command execution as root and full device takeover. The flaw scores CVSS 4.0 8.5 (High) and a vendor firmware patch is available; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Note a naming discrepancy in the source data - the free-text description says 'VX800v' while the CPE and tags reference 'VX1800V' - so verify the exact affected model against the TP-Link advisory before acting.

Local arbitrary code execution in Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer arises because the External Tools configuration stores executable paths that contain spaces without quoting (CWE-428). A low-privileged local user who can write a malicious binary into an earlier segment of the resolved search path can have Windows execute it in place of the intended tool, running code with the privileges of the operator using the application. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV; the CVSS 4.0 score is 7.3 (High), tempered by local access, high attack complexity, a present attack requirement, and required active user interaction.

Local authenticated code execution in Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer allows any low-privileged authenticated user to tamper with the incorrectly-protected external-tools configuration file (CWE-863) and redirect a configured tool path to a malicious executable. Because the payload runs when a different user later invokes the external tools feature, this is effectively a privilege-crossing RCE against the engineering workstation. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV; exploitation is gated by high attack complexity, a specific attack requirement, and required victim interaction (CVSS 4.0 base 7.3).

Arbitrary file write via path traversal in Tenable Agent 11.2.0 and 11.1.3 and earlier lets a privileged attacker escape the intended plugin directory and drop files at attacker-chosen paths, potentially escalating to remote code execution. The flaw is vendor-reported (Tenable TNS-2026-18) and affects the endpoint scanning agent that typically runs with elevated/service privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation is possible through an out-of-bounds write in the siman.exe (Siman) simulation-language component, which mishandles user-supplied data when parsing a model file. An attacker who convinces a user to open a crafted Arena file can run code in the context of that user's process. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so risk is currently theoretical rather than actively exploited.

Arbitrary code execution in Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation is possible through an out-of-bounds write in the linker.exe (Siman) component, which fails to properly validate user-supplied data parsed from simulation model files. A local attacker who convinces a user to open a specially crafted Arena file can corrupt memory and run code in the context of the current user. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, the issue is not in CISA KEV, and no EPSS score was provided, so real-world exploitation appears theoretical rather than observed.

Arbitrary code execution in Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation is possible through an out-of-bounds write in the expmt.exe (Siman) component, which fails to validate user-supplied data when parsing model/experiment files. A local attacker who convinces an engineer to open a malicious Arena file can run code in the context of the current user. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV; it was self-reported by Rockwell's PSIRT (advisory SD1784).

Arbitrary code execution in Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation is possible through an out-of-bounds write in the model.exe (Siman) component when a victim opens a maliciously crafted simulation model file. The flaw lets an attacker run code in the context of the current user by tricking an operator or engineer into opening a booby-trapped file, making it a client-side, file-delivery RCE rather than a remotely reachable network service bug. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV data was provided, so real-world exploitation appears limited to social-engineering-driven targeting.

Remote code execution in the Argo CD repo-server component (as shipped in Red Hat OpenShift GitOps and the argoproj argo-helm chart) allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the repo-server to run arbitrary code and, under certain conditions, poison cached manifests to push malicious Kubernetes resources into managed clusters, enabling full cluster takeover. The root cause is missing authentication (CWE-306) on a critical internal service that the default Helm chart left network-exposed. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but detailed third-party technical research (Synacktiv) and press coverage exist, and the flaw was reported unpatched at disclosure.

Unauthenticated arbitrary file write in Eclipse BaSyx Java Server SDK (2.0.0-milestone-05 through 2.0.0-milestone-12) lets remote attackers plant files anywhere the Java process can write when the server is deployed with the MongoDB file backend, potentially escalating to remote code execution. The AAS thumbnail API trusts a client-supplied fileName that is later reused as a filesystem path, so a traversal or absolute-path filename lands attacker-controlled bytes outside the intended directory. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but the vendor-fixed release (2.0.0-milestone-13) is available.

Insecure deserialization in the SAP Change and Transport System Attach Tool (ctsattach) lets an authenticated, low-privileged attacker achieve remote code execution by supplying a crafted archive that a victim then processes through the tool's library. Successful exploitation yields high confidentiality and integrity impact - attackers can read sensitive data and take control of the host and its processes - with low availability impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CWE-502 root cause and 7.6 CVSS make this a meaningful patch priority for SAP landscapes.

Arbitrary code execution in SAProuter on Microsoft Windows lets a local attacker plant a malicious DLL in an untrusted search-path location that SAProuter loads at runtime, hijacking the DLL loading process to run attacker code with the privileges of the SAProuter service. The flaw was reported by SAP and carries a CVSS 8.4 with full High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Because SAProuter typically runs as a persistent network gateway service, successful exploitation can compromise a strategically positioned host in an SAP landscape.