Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Impact | CVSS 8.4 with AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N indicates a HIGH severity local code execution primitive with low attack complexity and no user interaction required—a strong technical signal. However, real-world priority depends on: (1) EPSS score (if >0.95, exploitation is highly probable and should be treated as critical); (2) KEV/CISA known exploited status (currently unconfirmed in provided data); (3) Public POC availability (not confirmed); (4) Affected product scope (Word is ubiquitous, raising blast radius). The local-only attack vector significantly reduces opportunistic remote exploitation risk compared to network-based vulnerabilities, but for compromised systems, local privilege escalation or sandbox escape becomes a primary threat. SSVC analysis suggests: Exploitation=Unspecified (needs confirmation), Automatable=Yes (memory corruption often requires fuzzing but can be automated), Technical Impact=Total (arbitrary code execution). Recommendation: Treat as high-priority but not critical-without-context; prioritize patching on multi-user systems, shared workstations, and environments where local code execution is a plausible threat model. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with local system access (e.g., via prior compromise, USB access, or insider threat) crafts a malicious Word document (.docx, .doc, or macro-enabled variant) designed to trigger a use-after-free condition during parsing. When a victim opens the document, the vulnerability causes Word to reference freed memory, which the attacker has pre-populated with shellcode. Exploitation does not require user interaction beyond opening the file (UI:N), making social engineering unnecessary if the attacker can write to accessible file locations. The attacker achieves arbitrary code execution in the context of the Word process (typically medium or high integrity, depending on UAC configuration), enabling privilege escalation, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within the system. If POC is publicly available, exploitation difficulty decreases significantly; absence of confirmed POC suggests exploitation requires specialized fuzzing or reverse engineering to reliably trigger the memory condition. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Mar 14, 2026
Use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Office Word that allows local, unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code with high privileges. The vulnerability affects Word processing functionality and requires no user interaction, making it a critical local privilege escalation vector. Without confirmed KEV status or public POC availability, real-world exploitation likelihood should be assessed against EPSS data and patch availability from Microsoft security advisories.
RemediationAI
- PATCH: Apply the latest Microsoft Office security update from Microsoft Security Update Guide (portal.msrc.microsoft.com). Filter by CVE-2025-47957 to identify applicable KB articles and patch versions. 2. INTERIM MITIGATIONS (if patch unavailable): Restrict local access to systems running Word; disable macros and ActiveX controls; enforce application whitelisting to prevent arbitrary code execution; monitor for suspicious Word process behavior (e.g., spawning shells or loading unexpected libraries). 3. DETECTION: Monitor process creation, memory access patterns, and file operations initiated by winword.exe; log document opens from untrusted sources. 4. DEPLOYMENT: Prioritize patching multi-user systems, shared workstations, and kiosks where local code execution is high-risk.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This vulnerability is rooted in CWE-416 (Use After Free), a memory safety defect where the Word application attempts to access or manipulate memory that has already been deallocated or freed. This typically occurs in C/C++ codebases like Microsoft Office when object lifecycle management fails—either through improper reference counting, race conditions in multi-threaded code, or incorrect cleanup of dynamically allocated structures in Word's document processing engine. The vulnerability resides in Word's core document parsing or rendering subsystem, likely triggered during document loading or macro processing. The Local Attack Vector (AV:L) and No Privileges Required (PR:N) indicate exploitation requires code execution context on the target machine, but not administrative elevation to trigger the initial flaw.
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Executive ViewAI
A critical use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Office Word (CVE-2025-47957) enables attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems through malicious Word documents. With a public exploit available and no patch currently available, this poses an immediate risk to any organization where users open untrusted Word files, potentially leading to data breach, ransomware deployment, or system compromise.
Disable Microsoft Word macro execution via Group Policy or security templates; implement email gateway rules to block or sandbox Word attachments from external sources; enforce application allowlisting to prevent unauthorized code execution; segment high-risk users or departments from shared resources; require VPN + MFA for remote access; consider blocking Word document opening entirely and enforcing conversion to PDF for external documents; monitor endpoint detection and response (EDR) for suspicious Word process behavior and memory access patterns.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2025-17762
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB
GitHub PoC