Monthly
Remote code execution in GitButler desktop application versions prior to 0.19.7 allows attackers to execute arbitrary scripts within the Tauri webview by injecting malicious links into pull request bodies. The flaw activates when a user with forge integration enabled clicks the crafted link, leading to full compromise of the desktop client context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-xpmj-536r-9fc6 publicly documents the issue.
Remote code execution in Comet Backup server allows a tenant administrator to inject arbitrary code into the backup agent signing module via insufficient character filtering, ultimately running code with elevated privileges on the Comet server and on connected backup agent devices. The vendor advisory links the issue to the branding configuration path, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Combined with a Scope:Changed CVSS:3.1 score of 9.0, successful exploitation pivots from a single tenant context into the underlying server and downstream endpoints.
Remote code execution in Yamcs (the open-source mission control framework, yamcs-core) before 5.12.7 lets an authenticated operator holding the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege overwrite a Python (Jython) algorithm via the Mission Database REST API and run arbitrary OS commands on the host. The Jython script engine is invoked without a sandbox, so injected algorithm text can import java.lang.Runtime and shell out. Publicly available exploit code exists (a full PoC is published in the GitHub Security Advisory), but the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no public in-the-wild exploitation is identified.
Remote code execution in the Yamcs mission control framework (org.yamcs:yamcs-core, releases 4.7.3 through 5.12.6) lets a caller of the algorithm-override endpoint run arbitrary Java/OS code on the ground server. The Nashorn JavaScript engine that evaluates user-supplied algorithm text is created without a ClassFilter, so payloads can reach any Java class (e.g. java.lang.Runtime) and execute commands as the Yamcs process user; because the default install (no security.yaml) gives the built-in guest user superuser=true, the endpoint is reachable by an unauthenticated network attacker. A detailed working exploit is published in the GitHub Security Advisory (publicly available exploit code exists); the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS score was provided in the input.
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Pi.Alert, an open-source WiFi/LAN intruder detector with web-based service monitoring, in all versions prior to the 2026-05-07 release. The web configuration editor writes attacker-controlled content into pialert.conf, which the background scan daemon subsequently evaluates with Python's exec(), so injected statements run with the daemon's privileges. Because the product ships with web protection disabled by default, an attacker reaching the web interface needs no credentials, yielding a CVSS 9.8 critical flaw; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Pi.Alert, a Python-based Wi-Fi/LAN intruder detector, in all releases prior to the 2026-05-07 fix. The web UI's SaveConfigFile() endpoint writes attacker-supplied numeric configuration values such as SMTP_PORT into pialert.conf with no validation, and because that file is reloaded via Python's exec() by a background cron job every 3-5 minutes, injected Python executes at the OS level. On default installations (PIALERT_WEB_PROTECTION = False) no credentials are required, matching the CVSS 9.8 network/no-privilege rating; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, but trivial complexity and full CIA impact make it a high-priority patch.
Remote code execution in Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 22.0.0 through 22.0.4 and 24.0.0-alpha allows network-based attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the commonobject.class.php component. The CVSS 7.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) vector indicates no authentication or user interaction is required, though impact metrics are rated Low across CIA. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS scoring is very low at 0.06% (18th percentile) despite the unauthenticated network attack surface.
Code injection in Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 22.0.0 through 22.0.4 and 24.0.0-alpha allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute attacker-controlled PHP through the htdocs/core/actions_addupdatedelete.inc.php request handler (CWE-94). The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates a low-effort, network-reachable, no-authentication attack, though all impact metrics are rated Low (C:L/I:L/A:L), suggesting the executable surface is constrained rather than full system takeover. There is no public exploit code confirmed in the provided data and the issue is not in CISA KEV (no observed exploitation per SSVC), but a referenced research write-up and a GitHub Security Advisory exist, and SSVC rates the flaw as automatable.
Remote code execution in the WPCode WordPress plugin (versions through 2.3.5) lets authenticated author-level users run arbitrary PHP on the server. Because the plugin registers its 'wpcode' custom post type without a dedicated capability_type, WordPress falls back to standard post capabilities, so any author can create and publish PHP snippet posts via the XML-RPC wp.newPost method, which are later passed to eval() when rendered through the [wpcode] shortcode. EPSS is modest at 0.44% (63rd percentile) and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the low privilege bar and full CIA impact make this a high-priority patch for any multi-author site.
Remote code execution in the affiliate-toolkit WordPress plugin ("Multi-Network Affiliate & Amazon Product Display") affects versions up to and including 3.8.5, letting authenticated users with Editor-level access or higher run arbitrary PHP on the host. The flaw stems from the bundled BladeOne template engine's runString() method, which compiles attacker-supplied template content into PHP and executes it through eval() with no sanitization or sandboxing. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS sits at a low 0.24%, but the technical impact is total because a successful injection yields full server-side code execution.
Remote code execution in GitButler desktop application versions prior to 0.19.7 allows attackers to execute arbitrary scripts within the Tauri webview by injecting malicious links into pull request bodies. The flaw activates when a user with forge integration enabled clicks the crafted link, leading to full compromise of the desktop client context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-xpmj-536r-9fc6 publicly documents the issue.
Remote code execution in Comet Backup server allows a tenant administrator to inject arbitrary code into the backup agent signing module via insufficient character filtering, ultimately running code with elevated privileges on the Comet server and on connected backup agent devices. The vendor advisory links the issue to the branding configuration path, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Combined with a Scope:Changed CVSS:3.1 score of 9.0, successful exploitation pivots from a single tenant context into the underlying server and downstream endpoints.
Remote code execution in Yamcs (the open-source mission control framework, yamcs-core) before 5.12.7 lets an authenticated operator holding the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege overwrite a Python (Jython) algorithm via the Mission Database REST API and run arbitrary OS commands on the host. The Jython script engine is invoked without a sandbox, so injected algorithm text can import java.lang.Runtime and shell out. Publicly available exploit code exists (a full PoC is published in the GitHub Security Advisory), but the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no public in-the-wild exploitation is identified.
Remote code execution in the Yamcs mission control framework (org.yamcs:yamcs-core, releases 4.7.3 through 5.12.6) lets a caller of the algorithm-override endpoint run arbitrary Java/OS code on the ground server. The Nashorn JavaScript engine that evaluates user-supplied algorithm text is created without a ClassFilter, so payloads can reach any Java class (e.g. java.lang.Runtime) and execute commands as the Yamcs process user; because the default install (no security.yaml) gives the built-in guest user superuser=true, the endpoint is reachable by an unauthenticated network attacker. A detailed working exploit is published in the GitHub Security Advisory (publicly available exploit code exists); the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS score was provided in the input.
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Pi.Alert, an open-source WiFi/LAN intruder detector with web-based service monitoring, in all versions prior to the 2026-05-07 release. The web configuration editor writes attacker-controlled content into pialert.conf, which the background scan daemon subsequently evaluates with Python's exec(), so injected statements run with the daemon's privileges. Because the product ships with web protection disabled by default, an attacker reaching the web interface needs no credentials, yielding a CVSS 9.8 critical flaw; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Pi.Alert, a Python-based Wi-Fi/LAN intruder detector, in all releases prior to the 2026-05-07 fix. The web UI's SaveConfigFile() endpoint writes attacker-supplied numeric configuration values such as SMTP_PORT into pialert.conf with no validation, and because that file is reloaded via Python's exec() by a background cron job every 3-5 minutes, injected Python executes at the OS level. On default installations (PIALERT_WEB_PROTECTION = False) no credentials are required, matching the CVSS 9.8 network/no-privilege rating; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, but trivial complexity and full CIA impact make it a high-priority patch.
Remote code execution in Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 22.0.0 through 22.0.4 and 24.0.0-alpha allows network-based attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the commonobject.class.php component. The CVSS 7.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) vector indicates no authentication or user interaction is required, though impact metrics are rated Low across CIA. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS scoring is very low at 0.06% (18th percentile) despite the unauthenticated network attack surface.
Code injection in Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 22.0.0 through 22.0.4 and 24.0.0-alpha allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute attacker-controlled PHP through the htdocs/core/actions_addupdatedelete.inc.php request handler (CWE-94). The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates a low-effort, network-reachable, no-authentication attack, though all impact metrics are rated Low (C:L/I:L/A:L), suggesting the executable surface is constrained rather than full system takeover. There is no public exploit code confirmed in the provided data and the issue is not in CISA KEV (no observed exploitation per SSVC), but a referenced research write-up and a GitHub Security Advisory exist, and SSVC rates the flaw as automatable.
Remote code execution in the WPCode WordPress plugin (versions through 2.3.5) lets authenticated author-level users run arbitrary PHP on the server. Because the plugin registers its 'wpcode' custom post type without a dedicated capability_type, WordPress falls back to standard post capabilities, so any author can create and publish PHP snippet posts via the XML-RPC wp.newPost method, which are later passed to eval() when rendered through the [wpcode] shortcode. EPSS is modest at 0.44% (63rd percentile) and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the low privilege bar and full CIA impact make this a high-priority patch for any multi-author site.
Remote code execution in the affiliate-toolkit WordPress plugin ("Multi-Network Affiliate & Amazon Product Display") affects versions up to and including 3.8.5, letting authenticated users with Editor-level access or higher run arbitrary PHP on the host. The flaw stems from the bundled BladeOne template engine's runString() method, which compiles attacker-supplied template content into PHP and executes it through eval() with no sanitization or sandboxing. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS sits at a low 0.24%, but the technical impact is total because a successful injection yields full server-side code execution.