Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerabilities
2026-03-18
Unsigned WhatsApp webhook processing in OneUptime before 10.0.34 lets any remote, unauthenticated attacker POST forged Meta/WhatsApp status events to /api/notification/whatsapp/webhook and rewrite notification delivery records - marking failed alerts as delivered, suppressing escalation, and corrupting the notification audit trail. The advisory ships a working curl proof-of-concept demonstrating HTTP 200 acceptance of an unsigned payload on a default v10.0.23 Docker deployment, so publicly available exploit code exists; however there is no confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) activity, and EPSS is very low at 0.03% (7th percentile), reflecting the narrow integrity-only impact. Exploitation requires only that the instance's API be network-reachable; no credentials or secrets are needed, and the GET verification endpoint and the Slack webhook path are unaffected.
A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Statamic CMS allows authenticated users with asset upload permissions to bypass SVG sanitization during asset reuploads, enabling injection of malicious JavaScript that executes when other users view the compromised asset. The vulnerability affects Statamic CMS versions prior to 5.73.14 and 6.7.0, with patches available in those releases. The CVSS score of 8.7 (High) reflects the changed scope and high confidentiality/integrity impact, though exploitation requires low-privileged authenticated access and user interaction.
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the `return_to` query parameter of the Avo Ruby gem (pkg:rubygems/avo), allowing attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes when users click dynamically generated navigation buttons. The vulnerability affects both authenticated and unauthenticated deployments, with unauthenticated setups being directly exploitable via crafted links. The CWE-79 classification confirms this as a classic reflected XSS issue without a published CVSS score or EPSS metric currently available.
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in NLTK's WordNet Browser application (nltk.app.wordnet_app) in the lookup_... route, where attacker-controlled word parameters are reflected into HTML responses without proper escaping. This vulnerability affects users running the local WordNet Browser server and allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser context of the affected application. A proof-of-concept exploit has been publicly demonstrated, and a vendor patch is available.
A stored or reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Portabilis i-Educar 2.11 through improper input validation on the Name parameter in the /intranet/educar_servidor_curso_lst.php endpoint. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the context of other users' browsers, potentially enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or malware distribution. A public proof-of-concept exploit is available, and the vendor has not responded to early disclosure attempts, indicating no patch is currently available.
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in TRENDnet TEW-824DRU wireless router firmware versions 1.010B01 and 1.04B01, affecting the apply_sec.cgi web interface component. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript through the Language parameter in the sub_420A78 function, which is then executed in the context of another user's browser session. The vulnerability is publicly exploitable (working proof-of-concept available on GitHub), has a low CVSS score (3.5) due to authentication requirements and user interaction, but represents a real security concern for router administration interfaces where multiple users may access the web UI.
A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in itsourcecode University Management System version 1.0, specifically in the /add_result.php file where the 'vr' parameter is not properly sanitized. An authenticated attacker with high privileges can inject malicious scripts that execute in the context of other users' browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions within the application. A public proof-of-concept exploit is available on GitHub, and while the CVSS score is low (2.4), the vulnerability is actively documented in security databases and poses a real risk in educational environments.