Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege local access on Windows host
  2. Exploit
    Interact with VBS Enclave validation routine
  3. Execution
    Win TOCTOU timing race to swap validated resource
  4. Impact
    Bypass VBS security feature, undermine enclave integrity

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture TOCTOU prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have authorized high-privilege local access (PR:H) to a Windows system where Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclaves are in use, and to successfully win the time-of-check/time-of-use race window in the enclave's resource validation (CWE-367). Limiting factors: no remote vector (AV:L, local only), no network exploitation, high privileges already needed before the attack, non-deterministic success due to the race condition, and relevance only to hosts actually employing VBS Enclaves rather than all Windows installs. Impact is confined to integrity/security-feature bypass (C:N, A:N), not data theft or denial of service.

Impact

This is a low-to-moderate priority issue that is unlikely to warrant emergency patching but should be included in routine Windows update cycles. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N, base 4.4 MEDIUM) describes a local-only vulnerability requiring HIGH privileges (PR:H) that an already-authorized attacker leverages to bypass the VBS Enclave security boundary, with impact limited to integrity (I:H; no confidentiality or availability loss). All exploitation signals point the same direction and are consistent: CISA SSVC reports Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=partial, indicating no observed exploitation and no mass/automated exploitability. The CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. One internal inconsistency to verify: the input vector lists AC:L, but CWE-367 (TOCTOU race condition) inherently requires winning a timing window, which typically justifies AC:H - Microsoft may have rated complexity optimistically, and real-world exploitability is likely lower than AC:L implies. Because exploitation presupposes the attacker already holds high local privileges, this is a defense-in-depth / privilege-boundary weakening rather than an initial-access vector, so real-world priority is modest despite the product's ubiquity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has high-privilege local code execution on a Windows host with VBS Enclaves in use races the check-to-use window of the enclave, substituting a resource after validation but before the enclave acts on it, thereby bypassing the VBS integrity protection the enclave is meant to enforce. No public exploit code is available, and the attack requires local access plus winning a non-deterministic timing race, making reliable exploitation difficult.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Time-of-check time-of-use race condition in Microsoft Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave lets an attacker who already holds high local privileges bypass a security feature on the affected host, resulting in an integrity/security-feature bypass (CWE-367) rather than data disclosure, code execution, or denial of service. Only systems that actually use VBS Enclaves are in scope, and because exploitation requires PR:H local access plus successful timing of a race window, the issue is rated low severity (CVSS 4.4) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Vendor patches are available and this should be handled through routine Windows update cycles rather than emergency response.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70075 via the MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70075); the vendor confirms a patch is available, and the fixed builds per EUVD are 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, and 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2. Because exploitation requires the attacker to already possess high local privileges (PR:H) and depends on winning a non-deterministic race window, no emergency out-of-band response is warranted; fold the update into the normal patch cycle and prioritize hosts where VBS Enclaves are actively used, such as systems running enclave-based credential or key protection. Where patching must be deferred, the only meaningful compensating controls are reducing the population of accounts with local administrative rights and removing VBS Enclave usage on hosts that do not need it so the vulnerable code path is never reachable - but note the trade-off that disabling VBS or VBS Enclaves weakens the isolation guarantees other Windows security features depend on, so this should be treated as a temporary measure only. Fix versions cited here come directly from the EUVD affected-version data; do not assume later cumulative builds are fixed without confirming the build number, and do not treat the absence of public exploit code as a reason to skip the update.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

VBS (Virtualization-Based Security) uses the Windows hypervisor and the Secure Kernel to isolate security-critical code and secrets from the normal operating system; VBS Enclaves extend this by providing user-mode Trusted Execution Environment-style isolated regions whose contents are protected from the host OS and from other processes. The vulnerability is a classic time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness (CWE-367) in the enclave's resource validation logic: the enclave validates a resource, object reference, or memory mapping at one point in time, but the state can be mutated before that validated reference is actually used, so the security decision no longer matches the object being operated on. Success is non-deterministic because it depends on hitting the narrow window between check and use, which is why our independent assessment scores AC:H and the vendor's published vector scores AC:L; the difference does not change the practical conclusion that this is a hard-to-automate local bypass (CISA SSVC: Exploitation none, Automatable no, Technical Impact partial). The CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:H/UI:N) confirms the attack is local only, needs no user interaction, and requires the attacker to already hold high privileges, and the impact is limited to integrity (I:H) with no confidentiality or availability effect. Affected platforms span the Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2019, 2022, and 2025 builds enumerated in the EUVD version data, so applicability is a function of both OS build and whether VBS Enclaves are enabled in the environment.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 4.4 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.1 MEDIUM

Local-only (AV:L); TOCTOU race demands winning a timing window so AC:H (diverging from the input's AC:L); attacker must already hold high local privilege (PR:H); only integrity/security-boundary impact (I:H, C:N, A:N).

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 4.4

DescriptionCVE.org

Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 81% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
affected product is Microsoft Windows client and server, present in most environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy