Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privilege local access on Windows host
-
ExploitInteract with VBS Enclave validation routine
-
ExecutionWin TOCTOU timing race to swap validated resource
-
ImpactBypass VBS security feature, undermine enclave integrity
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture TOCTOU prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have authorized high-privilege local access (PR:H) to a Windows system where Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclaves are in use, and to successfully win the time-of-check/time-of-use race window in the enclave's resource validation (CWE-367). Limiting factors: no remote vector (AV:L, local only), no network exploitation, high privileges already needed before the attack, non-deterministic success due to the race condition, and relevance only to hosts actually employing VBS Enclaves rather than all Windows installs. Impact is confined to integrity/security-feature bypass (C:N, A:N), not data theft or denial of service. |
| Impact | This is a low-to-moderate priority issue that is unlikely to warrant emergency patching but should be included in routine Windows update cycles. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N, base 4.4 MEDIUM) describes a local-only vulnerability requiring HIGH privileges (PR:H) that an already-authorized attacker leverages to bypass the VBS Enclave security boundary, with impact limited to integrity (I:H; no confidentiality or availability loss). All exploitation signals point the same direction and are consistent: CISA SSVC reports Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=partial, indicating no observed exploitation and no mass/automated exploitability. The CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. One internal inconsistency to verify: the input vector lists AC:L, but CWE-367 (TOCTOU race condition) inherently requires winning a timing window, which typically justifies AC:H - Microsoft may have rated complexity optimistically, and real-world exploitability is likely lower than AC:L implies. Because exploitation presupposes the attacker already holds high local privileges, this is a defense-in-depth / privilege-boundary weakening rather than an initial-access vector, so real-world priority is modest despite the product's ubiquity. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has high-privilege local code execution on a Windows host with VBS Enclaves in use races the check-to-use window of the enclave, substituting a resource after validation but before the enclave acts on it, thereby bypassing the VBS integrity protection the enclave is meant to enforce. No public exploit code is available, and the attack requires local access plus winning a non-deterministic timing race, making reliable exploitation difficult. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Time-of-check time-of-use race condition in Microsoft Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave lets an attacker who already holds high local privileges bypass a security feature on the affected host, resulting in an integrity/security-feature bypass (CWE-367) rather than data disclosure, code execution, or denial of service. Only systems that actually use VBS Enclaves are in scope, and because exploitation requires PR:H local access plus successful timing of a race window, the issue is rated low severity (CVSS 4.4) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Vendor patches are available and this should be handled through routine Windows update cycles rather than emergency response.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70075 via the MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70075); the vendor confirms a patch is available, and the fixed builds per EUVD are 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, and 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2. Because exploitation requires the attacker to already possess high local privileges (PR:H) and depends on winning a non-deterministic race window, no emergency out-of-band response is warranted; fold the update into the normal patch cycle and prioritize hosts where VBS Enclaves are actively used, such as systems running enclave-based credential or key protection. Where patching must be deferred, the only meaningful compensating controls are reducing the population of accounts with local administrative rights and removing VBS Enclave usage on hosts that do not need it so the vulnerable code path is never reachable - but note the trade-off that disabling VBS or VBS Enclaves weakens the isolation guarantees other Windows security features depend on, so this should be treated as a temporary measure only. Fix versions cited here come directly from the EUVD affected-version data; do not assume later cumulative builds are fixed without confirming the build number, and do not treat the absence of public exploit code as a reason to skip the update.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
VBS (Virtualization-Based Security) uses the Windows hypervisor and the Secure Kernel to isolate security-critical code and secrets from the normal operating system; VBS Enclaves extend this by providing user-mode Trusted Execution Environment-style isolated regions whose contents are protected from the host OS and from other processes. The vulnerability is a classic time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness (CWE-367) in the enclave's resource validation logic: the enclave validates a resource, object reference, or memory mapping at one point in time, but the state can be mutated before that validated reference is actually used, so the security decision no longer matches the object being operated on. Success is non-deterministic because it depends on hitting the narrow window between check and use, which is why our independent assessment scores AC:H and the vendor's published vector scores AC:L; the difference does not change the practical conclusion that this is a hard-to-automate local bypass (CISA SSVC: Exploitation none, Automatable no, Technical Impact partial). The CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:H/UI:N) confirms the attack is local only, needs no user interaction, and requires the attacker to already hold high privileges, and the impact is limited to integrity (I:H) with no confidentiality or availability effect. Affected platforms span the Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2019, 2022, and 2025 builds enumerated in the EUVD version data, so applicability is a function of both OS build and whether VBS Enclaves are enabled in the environment.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Local-only (AV:L); TOCTOU race demands winning a timing window so AC:H (diverging from the input's AC:L); attacker must already hold high local privilege (PR:H); only integrity/security-boundary impact (I:H, C:N, A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99867
GHSA-v4w4-pr4r-w56x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB