Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach SSTP service on TCP/443
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted SSTP message sequence
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free race window
  4. Execution
    Reuse freed object for control
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target Windows host has the Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) VPN service active and network-reachable - typically a machine configured as a Routing and Remote Access (RRAS) SSTP VPN gateway listening on TCP/443; SSTP is not enabled on default desktop/server installs, so hosts without the RRAS/VPN role configured are not exposed. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N), but the AC:H rating reflects that the attacker must reliably trigger and win the use-after-free race condition, which limits exploit reliability. Affected builds span Windows 10/11 (1607 through 26H2) and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 per EUVD; patched builds (e.g. 10.0.26100.9711 for 24H2) remove the exposure.

Impact

This is a serious but conditionally-gated flaw. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.1) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated (PR:N) use-after-free in Windows SSTP yielding full C/I/A compromise - i.e. remote code execution. The single largest mitigating signal is AC:H: a use-after-free (CWE-416) over the network almost always implies a memory-timing/race condition the attacker must win, so reliable exploitation is non-trivial. No EPSS score, no KEV listing, and no POC are present in the input, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - this is NOT confirmed active exploitation despite the high base score. A key data conflict must be flagged: the input Tags include 'Denial Of Service', yet the CVSS vector and description both assert code execution with high integrity/confidentiality impact (I:H/C:H), so the DoS label understates the issue - treat it as RCE, not merely DoS. Net: a credible high-priority patch target because it is pre-auth network RCE affecting the ubiquitous Windows platform, but AC:H and the absence of any exploitation evidence argue it is not (yet) a drop-everything emergency relative to a PR:N/AC:L bug.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach a Windows host running the SSTP VPN endpoint (TCP/443) sends a crafted sequence of SSTP protocol messages designed to trigger the use-after-free, winning the memory race to corrupt freed object state. On success, they achieve arbitrary code execution over the network without authentication; the AC:H rating means the race may require repeated attempts, and no public exploit code is currently identified.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Remote code execution in the Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to run arbitrary code on hosts that expose the SSTP VPN service over the network. Successful exploitation requires a use-after-free race to be reliably triggered and won, which is why the flaw carries a high attack-complexity rating (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N, base 8.1) despite needing no credentials and no user interaction; the realistic exposure is limited to Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 machines configured as Routing and Remote Access (RRAS) SSTP VPN gateways, typically listening on TCP/443, since SSTP is not enabled on default installs. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw has not been confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); Microsoft has released fixed builds, so risk is concentrated in unpatched, internet-facing SSTP endpoints. This is a serious but conditionally-gated flaw whose practical severity depends entirely on whether the SSTP role is installed and reachable.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixed builds in the update guide for CVE-2026-85926 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85926) - install them per the EUVD version thresholds, e.g. Windows 11 24H2/25H2 to 10.0.26100.9711 / 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231 and 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9612, 1809 to 10.0.17763.9376 and 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650, 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612 and 2012/2012 R2 to 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 - prioritizing any host running the RRAS/SSTP VPN role. Where patching must be staged, reduce exposure by disabling the SSTP listener or the Routing and Remote Access service on hosts that do not need it (side effect: remote VPN clients lose connectivity and must migrate to IKEv2 or another VPN protocol), or by restricting TCP/443 on the SSTP gateway to known client address ranges via firewall or edge ACLs (side effect: the VPN endpoint is no longer usable by roaming or unmanaged clients). Because the flaw is a use-after-free race that is often more reliably abused for denial of service than for code execution, monitoring for repeated wwahost/rras service crashes or unexpected restarts on VPN gateways gives a useful detection signal for exploitation attempts in lieu of immediate patching. Note that hosts without the SSTP role are not exposed and can be patched on a normal cycle.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The underlying technology is SSTP, Microsoft's TLS-based VPN tunneling protocol that encapsulates PPP frames inside HTTPS so VPN traffic can traverse firewalls on TCP port 443. The root cause is a use-after-free (CWE-416): memory associated with an SSTP object is released while still referenced, and subsequent access to the dangling pointer enables memory corruption. Per the input tags this manifests as memory corruption with denial-of-service characteristics, but the CVSS vector scores confidentiality, integrity and availability all as High, consistent with code execution in the service context rather than a mere crash. Exploitation is network-reachable and unauthenticated (PR:N, UI:N) because the vulnerable parsing/handling path is reached before authentication completes in the SSTP handshake; the High attack-complexity component (AC:H) reflects the timing precision needed to win the race and land a controlled use of the freed memory, so exploit attempts may crash the service (an observable DoS) more often than they achieve reliable code execution. The affected CPE population is the Windows operating system family rather than an add-on product: EUVD lists Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, including Server Core installations, meaning the vulnerable code ships in the base OS and is only reachable when the SSTP/Remote Access role is configured.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable SSTP service with no auth or interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N); AC:H because the use-after-free requires winning a memory race; full RCE gives C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity remote code execution flaw in the Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) service could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on internet-facing VPN gateways, potentially providing a beachhead into the corporate network. Exposure is narrow but consequential: only Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 systems configured as Routing and Remote Access (RRAS) SSTP VPN gateways are affected, as SSTP is not enabled on default installations. Because these gateways are deliberately internet-reachable and typically bridge remote workforces into internal resources, this should be treated as a priority remediation item even though no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 49% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows client/server OS component across nearly all environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy