Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach RRAS endpoint over network
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted RRAS protocol packets
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free in RRAS
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap and hijack control flow
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code in service context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) role must be installed and enabled on the target Windows host - this is the specific prerequisite, and because RRAS is not enabled by default, only systems deployed as VPN, dial-up, NAT, or LAN/WAN routing gateways are exposed. Where the role is enabled, the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates no authentication and no user interaction are needed from the attacker; the only limiting factors are network reachability to the RRAS service and the non-default presence of the role itself. Affected builds span Windows 10/11 (1607 through 26H2/26H1) and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations.

Impact

This is a credible high-priority vulnerability, though several signals require caveats. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.8 Critical) describes remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity code execution with full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact and no user interaction - the worst-case profile for a network service. The CWE-416 (Use-After-Free) classification is consistent with a memory-corruption RCE. Mitigating the raw score: the affected component, Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS), is NOT enabled by default on Windows, so the exploitable population is far smaller than the ubiquitous Windows install base implies - real exposure is concentrated on VPN/RAS/routing gateways. No EPSS score was supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. KEV status is not present in the input, so there is no confirmed active exploitation. No POC was indicated, so 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' CONFLICT/CAVEAT: the 'Authentication Bypass' tag is inconsistent with a CWE-416 use-after-free and with PR:N (there is no authentication to bypass when the vector is already unauthenticated) - this tag appears spurious and should not drive prioritization. No SSVC decision data was provided. Net: patch promptly on any host running the RRAS role, but blanket emergency treatment across all Windows assets is not warranted given the non-default service.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network reachability to a Windows server running the RRAS role (e.g., a VPN or dial-up/routing gateway) sends specially crafted RRAS protocol traffic that triggers a use-after-free in the service. Because the CVSS vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no credentials or user interaction are required, and successful memory corruption yields code execution in the service's high-privilege context. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, so exploitation currently requires original vulnerability-research effort.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Remote code execution in the Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) affects Windows 10 and Windows 11 builds from 1607 through 26H1/26H2 as well as Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations, but only on hosts where the RRAS role is actually installed and enabled. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.8) indicates an unauthenticated, remotely reachable attacker who requires neither credentials nor user interaction can corrupt memory in the service and gain full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Because RRAS is not a default role, exposure is limited to systems deployed as VPN, dial-up, NAT, or LAN/WAN routing gateways; a vendor patch is available and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-85792 as published in the MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85792); the fixed build thresholds in the affected-version data are the remediation targets - for example 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 for the 24H2 / Server 2025 branch, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.17763.9376 for Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809, 10.0.14393.9612 for Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.26300.9711 for 26H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for 26H1, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012 and 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2 - and verify that coverage for the legacy Server 2012/2012 R2 branches is valid under the customer's current servicing entitlement before relying on it. Where patching cannot be immediate, the highest-value compensating control is to stop the service and remove the role on any host that does not actually terminate VPN, dial-up, NAT, or routing traffic (Uninstall-WindowsFeature RemoteAccess / Routing, or set the RemoteAccess service to Disabled), accepting that this intentionally breaks those functions; for hosts that must keep RRAS, restrict reachability to the service with host firewall rules and perimeter ACLs so that only known VPN peer addresses and required ports (PPTP 1723/TCP plus GRE, L2TP 1701/UDP with IKE 500/UDP and 4500/UDP, SSTP 443/TCP) can reach it, understanding that this degrades roaming-client connectivity; and monitor the RRAS service for crash/restart patterns that would indicate exploitation attempts, since the endpoint-protection signal for memory-corruption bugs of this type is post-exploitation rather than pre-exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in Microsoft's Routing and Remote Access Service, the in-box Windows role that implements multi-protocol VPN termination (PPTP, L2TP/IPSec, SSTP, IKEv2), dial-up access, network address translation, and LAN/WAN routing on Windows hosts. Use-after-free flaws of this class arise when an object is freed while a pointer to it is still reachable - commonly through concurrent request handling, malformed packet sequences, or a race in the service's connection/interface bookkeeping - after which the dangling reference is dereferenced and attacker-influenced data can be written over reused heap memory, typically pivoting to control-flow hijack and code execution in the service context (SYSTEM). The supplied tags (Authentication Bypass, RCE, Use After Free, Memory Corruption) align with the CVSS vector's PR:N, confirming the attack path begins before authentication and is reachable over the network to the RRAS listener; the tag set also confirms the memory-corruption root cause rather than a configuration or logic flaw. Affected binaries are the RRAS service components shipped in the Windows client and server SKUs enumerated by the EUVD affected-version list, spanning NT 6.2/6.3 (Server 2012/2012 R2) through 10.0.14393, 10.0.17763, 10.0.19044/19045, 10.0.20348, 10.0.22631, 10.0.26100, 10.0.26200, 10.0.26300, and 10.0.28000 build families. No EPSS score or CISA KEV entry was supplied with this record.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Network-reachable RRAS service exploitable without credentials or interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) yielding full code execution; AC:L retained per vendor despite UAF, impacts all High.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Remote Code Execution in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows attacker to gain an unauthorized access to victim's machine

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) affects Windows 10 and Windows 11 builds 1607 through 26H1/26H2, plus Windows Server 2012 through 2025, but only where the RRAS role is installed and enabled. Because RRAS is commonly used on VPN, dial-up, NAT, or routing gateways, a successful attack could fully compromise perimeter systems without credentials or user interaction, disrupting remote access and potentially opening a path into internal networks. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated network reachability and critical severity warrant immediate leadership attention.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 41% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Windows is ubiquitous but the RRAS role is not enabled by default
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

55
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy