Skip to main content

Windows Shell EUVDEUVD-2026-99398

| CVE-2026-83876 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-mwcv-r7rj-rgvv
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable Windows Shell operation
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free memory corruption
  4. Execution
    Execute controlled code as SYSTEM
  5. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess authenticated, low-privileged local code execution on an affected Windows host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L); it is not remotely exploitable and requires no user interaction (UI:N). The limiting factors are substantial: an attacker must first gain any valid local account or running process on the machine before triggering the use-after-free in Windows Shell, and the host must be running an unpatched build within the listed ranges (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 below 10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2025 below 10.0.26100.33650, Windows 10 22H2 below 10.0.19044.7807). No special non-default configuration is indicated by the description.

Impact

This is a genuine but not emergency-grade priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local privilege-escalation requiring the attacker to already hold low-level authenticated access on the host; it is not remotely reachable. The multiple exploitation signals are consistent and point toward lower immediacy: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation=none and Automatable=no (despite Technical Impact=total), the CVE is not on CISA KEV, and no public POC is referenced - so the exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The SSVC Technical Impact=total aligns with the C:H/I:H/A:H triad (full SYSTEM-level compromise once exploited). Net: real and should be patched promptly as part of normal Patch Tuesday cadence, but as a local EoP with no active exploitation and no automation it is lower urgency than a network-facing or actively-exploited bug. One minor tag conflict: the input Tags include 'Denial Of Service,' which does not match the description (privilege elevation) or the impact metrics - treat the vuln as an EoP, not a DoS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained low-privileged authenticated access to a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a standard user account, or a compromised service) triggers a use-after-free condition in the Windows Shell to corrupt memory and run code at SYSTEM. No public exploit code is referenced at the time of analysis, and the local-only vector (AV:L) means the attacker must already be executing on the target machine.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Use-after-free in the Windows Shell lets an authenticated, low-privileged local attacker elevate privileges on unpatched Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server builds, with high impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability (CVSS 3.1 base 7.8, CWE-416). Exploitation is local, requires no user interaction, and is only possible after the attacker already holds code execution under a valid low-privileged account (AV:L/PR:L/UI:N); CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as "none" and not automatable, and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. Microsoft has released vendor patches, so the fix is a standard update rather than an emergency mitigation, though the total technical impact rating makes prompt patching worthwhile.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft update that brings each build to or above its fixed level - Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 respectively, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470, and Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761; verify build numbers after deployment and follow https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83876 for superseding updates. Because exploitation requires the attacker to already have authenticated local code execution, the most effective compensating controls reduce that prerequisite rather than masking the bug: restrict local interactive and RDP logon rights to staff who genuinely need them (trade-off: reduced administrative flexibility and possible help-desk friction), remove unnecessary local Administrator group memberships and enforce least privilege and JIT/PIM administration (trade-off: more change-management overhead), and deploy WDAC or AppLocker in allow-list mode to block the untrusted binaries an attacker would use as a loader or secondary payload (trade-off: requires an application inventory and can break unsigned line-of-business tools if not piloted). Credential Guard and LSA protection limit the value of any tokens obtained after elevation but do not prevent the shell use-after-free itself, and generic shell hardening such as disabling unnecessary shell extensions or third-party shell handlers can shrink the reachable attack surface while degrading user functionality. Patch deferral is not advisable given the high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, but on hosts that cannot be updated quickly, prioritizing the reduced-logon and application-control measures above gives the best risk reduction for the lowest operational cost.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-416 (Use After Free), a memory-corruption class in which an object is released while a reference to it remains live; the dangling pointer is subsequently dereferenced, and if the freed heap region is reallocated with attacker-influenced data the shell can be tricked into operating on a crafted object. The affected code lives in the Windows Shell, the user-mode UI subsystem (explorer.exe and its supporting libraries) that handles the desktop, taskbar, file associations and shell extensions, which is why the parsing and object-lifetime handling there is a recurring target. The accompanying tags (Memory Corruption, Use After Free, Denial Of Service) are consistent with a flaw that can both crash the shell process and, in the privilege-elevation case described by Microsoft, yield code execution in a context more privileged than the attacker's starting point. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U indicates the trigger is reachable with low attack complexity from an already-authenticated local session without any victim interaction, and the scope-unchanged rating means the impact is contained to the affected OS security authority. EUVD enumerates affected builds by Windows version and build number rather than supplying standalone CPE strings, mapping this to the Microsoft Windows operating system product family across desktop and server SKUs, including Server Core installations. No non-default configuration is indicated as a prerequisite, and the availability of an official Microsoft fix confirms this is a defect in shipped shell code rather than a misconfiguration.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local use-after-free EoP requiring a pre-existing low-privileged account (AV:L, PR:L) with no user interaction, yielding full SYSTEM-level confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows Shell allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A use-after-free flaw in the Windows Shell (CVE-2026-83876) allows an attacker who already holds a low-privileged account on a Windows 10, Windows 11, or Windows Server system to elevate to higher privileges, potentially gaining full control of the host and the data and services it can reach. Because exploitation requires an existing foothold rather than remote access, this is chiefly a post-compromise escalation risk that magnifies the damage of any initial intrusion and complicates containment. Microsoft has released patches, making this a routine update priority rather than a crisis; unpatched endpoints and servers remain the exposure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Microsoft Windows desktop and server OS, present in nearly all environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy