Skip to main content

Mozilla Firefox EUVDEUVD-2026-98638

| CVE-2026-109715 HIGH
Buffer Overflow (CWE-119)
2026-10-13 mozilla GHSA-m8f5-fc69-f3j6
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mozilla
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim to malicious web page
  2. Delivery
    Serve crafted JavaScript payload
  3. Exploit
    Trigger boundary violation in JS engine
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory to leak/alter process data
  5. Impact
    Compromise browser confidentiality and integrity

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to run an affected Mozilla Firefox build (any version prior to Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, or Firefox ESR 153.5) and to actively load attacker-controlled web content that executes JavaScript - this is the user-interaction requirement reflected by UI:R. No authentication or special configuration is needed on the target, and the flaw is reachable through the default JavaScript engine that runs on ordinary page visits. The principal limiting factor is that the attack is not zero-click: the user must navigate to or render the malicious page, so it depends on social engineering, malvertising, or a compromised/watering-hole site rather than unattended remote compromise.

Impact

Signals point to a genuine but not emergency-level risk. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N, base 8.1) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity memory-safety flaw in Firefox's JavaScript engine that an unauthenticated attacker can trigger, but only with user interaction (the victim must load attacker-controlled web content). Mitigating signals dominate the real-world picture: EPSS is only 0.16% (4th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public exploit was identified in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active or imminent exploitation. No SSVC decision data is present in the input to corroborate automatability or technical impact. The required user interaction (UI:R) and scope-unchanged (S:U) rating keep this below the zero-click drive-by tier. One internal tension to verify: for a CWE-119 boundary-condition bug in a JS engine one would often expect an availability impact (crash), yet the vendor-aligned vector lists A:N - suggesting Mozilla assessed the primary impact as information disclosure/integrity (e.g., out-of-bounds read/write usable for data exfiltration or exploit primitives) rather than a reliable crash; confirm the exact impact against the MFSA advisories. Overall: a legitimately high-severity browser bug warranting prompt patching as part of normal browser update cadence, but current exploitation signals indicate it is not a widespread active threat today.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker hosts or compromises a web page containing malicious JavaScript and lures a Firefox user to visit it via a phishing link, malvertising, or a watering-hole site. When the victim's browser parses the crafted script, the incorrect boundary condition in the JavaScript engine is triggered, corrupting memory to leak or manipulate in-process data. No public exploit code was identified at the time of analysis, and a successful attack requires the user to actually load the malicious content (UI:R).

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026

Memory corruption in Mozilla Firefox's JavaScript engine can be triggered when a remote unauthenticated attacker convinces a user to load attacker-controlled JavaScript content, yielding high confidentiality and integrity impact with no availability impact. This is not a zero-click attack; exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R) to render a malicious page, so it depends on social engineering, malvertising, or a compromised site. Mozilla fixed the issue in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, and Firefox ESR 153.5; at time of analysis there is no public exploit identified, and EPSS is very low at 0.16% (4th percentile), indicating a genuine but not emergency-level risk.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to Mozilla Firefox 158 (standard release), Firefox ESR 115.43, or Firefox ESR 153.5 as applicable; these are the vendor-released patch versions that resolve CVE-2026-109715. Because the flaw is in the JavaScript engine and no public exploit is known, there is no practical server-side workaround: disabling JavaScript in Firefox would prevent exploitation but breaks the vast majority of modern websites, so it is not recommended as a general mitigation. Where immediate patching is impossible, restrict browsing to trusted sites, use an up-to-date alternative browser, and enforce rapid auto-update policies; note that these are compensating measures with significant usability or coverage trade-offs. Monitor the Mozilla advisories at https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-106/ through mfsa2026-110 for any updates.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a CWE-119 improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer - specifically, incorrect boundary conditions in Mozilla's JavaScript engine (SpiderMonkey), which executes JavaScript in Firefox and Firefox ESR. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms that all Firefox releases before the fixed versions are potentially affected, as the flaw is in the core script-processing component reachable on any ordinary page load. Because the engine runs attacker-supplied JavaScript with the privileges of the browser content process, an out-of-bounds memory condition can lead to memory corruption that the CVSS vector rates as high confidentiality and integrity impact (C:H/I:H) without availability impact (A:N), with network reachability, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction required (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U). The Mozilla bug 2073267 and advisories mfsa2026-106 through mfsa2026-110 track the fix.

Know when Firefox gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mozilla) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable via web content (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) but needs the user to load a malicious page (UI:R); impact is in-process (S:U) with high confidentiality/integrity and, per vendor, no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mozilla).

CVSS VectorVendor: mozilla

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Oct 16, 2026 - 19:26 NVD
8.1 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 12:29 cve.org
HIGH 8.1
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 12:29 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

Incorrect boundary conditions in the JavaScript Engine component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, and Firefox ESR 153.5.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A memory-corruption flaw in Mozilla Firefox's JavaScript engine (CVE-2026-109715, CVSS 8.1) can expose confidential data and allow tampering on affected Firefox installations when a user is lured into loading a malicious or compromised web page. The exposure is driven by employee browsing behavior rather than network perimeter, so any workforce segment using unpatched Firefox - including remote and BYOD users - carries the risk. Mozilla has released fixed versions and no public exploit has been identified, so this is a straightforward, time-boxed patch action rather than an emergency incident.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Firefox is one of the most widely deployed web browsers worldwide
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2013-0758 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jan 13

Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb

CVE-2013-0753 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jan 13

Use-after-free vulnerability in the serializeToStream implementation in the XMLSerializer component in Mozilla Firefox b

CVE-2012-3993 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Oct 10

The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi

CVE-2013-1710 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Aug 07

The crypto.generateCRMFRequest function in Mozilla Firefox before 23.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.8, Thunderbird befo

CVE-2014-8636 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 14

The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with

CVE-2013-0757 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jan 13

The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi

CVE-2014-1510 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 19

The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se

CVE-2014-1511 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 19

Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and SeaMonkey before 2.25 allow remo

CVE-2016-1960 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 13

Integer underflow in the nsHtml5TreeBuilder class in the HTML5 string parser in Mozilla Firefox before 45.0 and Firefox

CVE-2015-0816 MEDIUM POC
5.0 Apr 01

Mozilla Firefox before 37.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.6, and Thunderbird before 31.6 do not properly restrict resource

CVE-2015-0802 MEDIUM POC
5.0 Apr 01

Mozilla Firefox before 37.0 relies on docshell type information instead of page principal information for Window.webidl

CVE-2013-2566 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Mar 15

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy