Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAccess credential store or transmission path
-
ExploitRecover insufficiently protected credentials
-
ImpactAuthenticate and hijack remote desktop session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Credential protection in transit/storage
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The CVE describes Insufficiently Protected Credentials (CWE-522) in Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1, meaning the product stores or transmits account credentials without adequate protection (e.g., weak, reversible, or cleartext encoding); the exact feature, file, or protocol is NOT stated in the one-line description and must be confirmed from the referenced RedTeam Pentesting advisory (rt-sa-2026-001). Limiting factors for defenders: realistic exploitation hinges on whether an attacker can actually reach the exposed credential material - if recovery requires local access to a stored credential blob or a man-in-the-middle position on the session traffic, true impact is narrower than the AV:N/PR:N CVSS vector implies. The description provides no evidence of required user interaction, and the authentication requirement to reach the flaw is not confirmed from available data beyond the NVD vector's PR:N claim, which conflicts with typical CWE-522 behavior. |
| Impact | Signals conflict sharply and should be weighed carefully. The NVD/MITRE CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) rates this as critical and remotely exploitable without authentication, but the EPSS score is only 0.14% (3rd percentile), it is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is identified in the provided data. That combination points to a high-CVSS-but-low-observed-risk item rather than an active threat. There is also internal tension between the weakness class and the vector: CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials) typically describes credentials stored or transmitted with weak/reversible protection, which usually yields a confidentiality-centric, access-dependent impact - not a full network-reachable, unauthenticated, C:H/I:H/A:H compromise. The 9.8 rating with PR:N/AV:N appears aggressive for a credential-protection flaw and should be verified against the vendor and the referenced red-team advisory before treating it as a drop-everything priority. SSVC-style framing: exploitation status is 'none' (no KEV, no confirmed POC), automatability is unproven, and technical impact is claimed total but unconfirmed. Net: a critical paper score with weak real-world exploitation evidence - prioritize patching where the product is deployed, but it does not currently show the hallmarks of widespread active exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who can reach the credential storage or transmission path of Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1 recovers account credentials that are insufficiently protected (e.g., weakly or reversibly encrypted), then replays them to authenticate and take over remote sessions. A technical advisory from RedTeam Pentesting (rt-sa-2026-001) is referenced and likely documents the credential-recovery technique, but no weaponized public exploit code is identified in the provided data. Realistic feasibility depends heavily on whether credential exposure is truly network-reachable as the CVSS vector claims, which is unconfirmed from the sparse description. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Insufficiently protected credentials in Rocket Software Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1 can expose account secrets to an attacker who can reach the credential material, potentially compromising downstream systems that use those credentials. The CVE feeds rate the issue as 9.8 with CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, but our independent assessment is AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N: local, authenticated, and confidentiality-only, because realistic impact depends on local access to a stored credential blob or a man-in-the-middle position on session traffic, and the exact exposed feature is not specified in the one-line description. EPSS is 0.14 percent at the 3rd percentile, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis or CISA KEV entry was provided.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Primary action is to review the Rocket Software page at http://rocket.com and the RedTeam Pentesting advisory at https://www.redteam-pentesting.de/en/advisories/rt-sa-2026-001/ for a fixed build, updated configuration guidance, or an official statement for Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1. If the version must remain in use, compensating controls should target credential exposure: restrict interactive and local logon access to trusted administrators only, because the independent assessment is AV:L/PR:L and the flaw likely requires an attacker to reach stored credentials; this reduces exposure but impairs shared-workstation and helpdesk workflows. Avoid saving credentials in Rocket Remote Desktop and use operating-system credential vaults or unique per-session credentials instead; this removes the risky stored secrets but forces users to re-enter credentials and may break automation. Enforce encrypted transport for any credential-bearing session traffic; this adds configuration overhead but blocks credential recovery if the defect involves transmission. Monitor file, registry, and process access around Rocket Remote Desktop credential stores for suspicious reads, and apply least privilege so a credential leak cannot escalate to domain or infrastructure-wide compromise. Reassess after vendor guidance, because the exact affected feature is not confirmed in the one-line description.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-522, Insufficiently Protected Credentials, means the product stores or transmits account credentials without adequate protection, such as weak reversible encoding, cleartext storage, or unprotected transport. The CVE description names only Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1. The supplied CPE cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is a placeholder with no concrete vendor, product, or version, and the ENISA EUVD affected version list is n/a n/a, so the normalization data does not independently confirm a broader affected range or the exact component involved. The CVE.org/NVD vector implies remote unauthenticated exploitation with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, while the independent assessment limits impact to local authenticated confidentiality loss. That discrepancy is important for defenders because CWE-522 flaws usually require an attacker to read a credential store locally or to intercept credentials in transit; the specific file, registry location, API, or protocol must be confirmed from the RedTeam Pentesting advisory rt-sa-2026-001 before assuming the network-exposed vector is achievable in a given deployment.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE-522 credential recovery typically needs local access to the stored secret (AV:L, PR:L) and yields confidentiality disclosure only (C:H, I:N, A:N); NVD's 9.8 network/full-impact vector is unverified from the description.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Rocket Software Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1 is vulnerable to Insufficiently Protected Credentials.
Executive ViewAI
Rocket Software Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1 stores account credentials with insufficient protection, so anyone who can reach that credential material or intercept session traffic could recover secrets and use them against the downstream systems those credentials unlock. No vendor patch is available yet, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so the immediate risk is a quiet credential-theft path rather than a broad remote compromise. Leadership should care because the exposure is concentrated in the teams and service accounts that trust this tool as their credential store, and any stolen secret inherits whatever access those downstream systems grant.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict local and interactive access to the credential store on Rocket Remote Desktop 18.0.8583.1 hosts, rotate and vault all credentials the product manages, enforce MFA and least privilege on downstream systems, segment and monitor networks to prevent credential interception, and monitor credential-store reads plus downstream authentication anomalies for signs of misuse.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-95969
GHSA-fpgq-5c6j-qf67
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB