Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent/L2 or wireless network position
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted packets to Meraki device
  3. Exploit
    Trigger CWE-119 buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory beyond component scope
  5. Impact
    Achieve code execution / device compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires Adjacent network positioning (CVSS AV:A): the attacker must be on the same Layer 2 segment, broadcast domain, or within wireless range of the affected Cisco Meraki device (MR wireless AP, MV camera, MX appliance, or Campus Gateway) - the flaw is NOT exploitable from the routed internet without such a foothold. No authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are required, and default configurations appear affected per the generic hardening advisory. Limiting factors: the adjacency requirement means an attacker needs prior local/wireless access, which meaningfully constrains opportunistic mass exploitation; the exact enabled feature or protocol that triggers the CWE-119 buffer issue is not disclosed in the grouped advisory and should be confirmed with Cisco.

Impact

Signals are mixed and lean toward 'high CVSS, but not yet a demonstrated real-world priority.' The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.6) describes an unauthenticated, low-complexity attack with full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact and a scope change - severe on paper. However, the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), not Network, so this is NOT internet-wide remotely exploitable; the attacker must sit on the same Layer 2 / wireless segment or broadcast domain as the affected device. Critically, the vulnerability was INTERNALLY discovered by Cisco during a proactive security review, there is NO CISA KEV listing, NO EPSS score provided, and NO public exploit - so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' There is no evidence of active or opportunistic exploitation. The description is also a grouped-hardening advisory covering 'multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities' under CWE-119, so the specific buffer-management defect, affected code path, and precise triggering conditions are NOT disclosed - this ambiguity should be verified against the Cisco advisory before treating the 9.6 as a drop-everything number. Net: patch on a normal-to-expedited cadence given high impact and the critical nature of the devices, but the Adjacent vector plus absence of any exploitation signal makes this lower immediate risk than a comparable AV:N/KEV-listed bug.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has gained a foothold on the local network - for example, by associating with a Meraki MR wireless SSID or reaching an MX/MV device on the same broadcast segment - sends crafted traffic that triggers a buffer management flaw (CWE-119) in the device software. Because no authentication or user interaction is required and the CVSS scope is changed, successful exploitation could yield code execution or full compromise of the device with impact beyond the vulnerable component. No public proof-of-concept exists; the issue was found internally by Cisco.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026

Adjacent-network buffer management flaws in Cisco Meraki OS let an unauthenticated attacker within Layer 2 or wireless range trigger memory-safety failures on Cisco Meraki MR wireless access points, MV cameras, MX appliances, and Campus Gateway software, with the grouped advisory rated CVSS 9.6 (scope change plus high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact). Exploitation requires the attacker to already sit on the same broadcast domain, Layer 2 segment, or RF coverage area - the flaw is not reachable from the routed internet - and the hardening bulletin does not disclose which protocol or feature actually triggers the CWE-119 condition. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis; the fix ships as part of a vendor internal hardening release rather than a discrete single-version patch.

RemediationAI

Primary remediation is to apply the Cisco Meraki OS hardening release described in Cisco's advisory (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-hardening-meraki-os-drbEX9GH), which is the vendor-released fix for the buffer management issues tracked by CVE-2026-76464; patch status is "Patch available per vendor advisory" and no standalone fix version is published in the CVE data, so the exact patched firmware image per platform (Campus Gateway Software, Meraki MR, MV, and MX) must be taken from that advisory and applied via the Meraki dashboard for cloud-managed devices. Because the attack surface is the adjacent network (AV:A, PR:N, UI:N), the highest-value compensating controls until upgrade completes are segmentation and Layer 2 hardening: place Meraki APs, cameras, MX appliances, and gateways on dedicated management VLANs isolated from user and guest traffic, enforce 802.1X or MAB on access ports, enable DHCP snooping, dynamic ARP inspection, and storm control to limit an attacker's ability to reach or manipulate the device's L2 neighborhood, and restrict or disable unused SSIDs and management interfaces. The trade-off is that aggressive L2 isolation and 802.1X can break legitimate client roaming, Bonjour/mDNS discovery, and camera-to-NVR traffic, so these changes need staged testing; disabling wireless or management features outright reduces functionality and may not be acceptable for production APs. Given the undetermined trigger condition, also monitor Cisco's advisory for revision, correlate Meraki device logs for unexpected reboots or crashes that could indicate a memory-corruption attempt, and treat the CVE as high severity in patch-prioritization while recognizing that exploitation requires a pre-existing adjacent-network foothold.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.17
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.0.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.0
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware MV 7.2.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.14
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.10
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 19.1
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Software MR 30.6
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.0.1
Cisco Campus Gateway Software CG 33.1.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.18
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware MV 7.2.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware MV 7.3.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 2.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.1.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.11
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.16
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.7
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.1
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 16.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.30
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.23
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.6.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.5
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 17.8
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.26
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.5.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 2.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.15
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Software MR 33.1.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.4.1
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 17.9
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.17
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.32
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.9
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.27
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.16
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 16.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.4
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 26.1.4
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.13
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.25
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.6
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.15
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.14
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.35
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware MV 7.3
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 17.10
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.3.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.5
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.19
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.7
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 17.6
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.11
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 26.1.6
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 18.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.18
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.4
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.1
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 26.2.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.18.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.33
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.24
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 2.0
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 18.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.20
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.22
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.0
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Software MR 32.1.7
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.2
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 18.211.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.12
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.6
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.19
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.10
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.3
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 17.7
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 16.4
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.6.1
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Software MR 32.2.4
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.9
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.2.2
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 26.1.5
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.28
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.2.1
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 19.2.8
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.0
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware MV 7.3.2
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.12
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Software MR 32.2.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.36
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.29
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.13
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.4
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.0
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 5.5
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 16.6
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 6.1.1
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.8
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.31
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.20
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware MX 26.2.1
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 17.3
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.21
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.8
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 4.6
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Software MR 33.1.1
Cisco Meraki MX Firmware 16.5
Cisco Meraki MV Firmware 3.34

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_campus_gateway_software_cg no fix
euvd cisco_meraki_mr_wireless_access_points_software_mr no fix
euvd cisco_meraki_mv_firmware no fix
euvd cisco_meraki_mv_firmware_mv no fix
euvd cisco_meraki_mx_firmware no fix
euvd cisco_meraki_mx_firmware_mx no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 6 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) is the umbrella class for the classic memory-corruption family - stack and heap overflows, off-by-one writes, and unchecked length or index arithmetic - where software fails to validate that data written into a buffer stays within its allocated bounds. Cisco's advisory is a proactive hardening release covering multiple internally discovered issues grouped under this CWE rather than a single named defect, and the underlying buffer management problems sit in Meraki OS code shared across product lines. The CPE data confirms the blast radius: Cisco Meraki MR wireless access point software, Meraki MV camera firmware, Meraki MX appliance firmware, and Cisco Campus Gateway Software are all listed as affected with wildcard versions, meaning every build predating the hardening release is presumed vulnerable. The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates the attack is launched from an adjacent network position (AV:A) with low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction, and because the scope is changed (S:C) a compromise of the Meraki component can affect resources beyond its own security authority, such as downstream network segments or management infrastructure. The combination of PR:N and AV:A means any device that can reach the Meraki node's L2 neighborhood - a rogue client, a compromised laptop on the same SSID, or an attacker within radio range - is a viable launch point once the specific vulnerable code path is identified.

Know when Cisco Campus Gateway Software gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 9.6 CRITICAL
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.6 CRITICAL

Adjacent vector and no auth/UI match a wireless/L2 buffer-overflow in network gear; CWE-119 with changed scope plausibly yields full C/I/A impact, though grouped advisory limits certainty.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco networking engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.

The vulnerabilities tracked by this CVE-2026-76464 are related to buffer management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-119.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco Meraki's wireless access points, cameras, and network appliances - the connectivity backbone for many distributed branch, retail, and campus environments - contain a critical memory-safety flaw that could allow someone positioned on the same network segment or within wireless range to disrupt or compromise those devices. Because the flaw is only reachable from an adjacent position rather than the public internet, exposure is concentrated in locations where physical and wireless perimeters are weak, and no discrete versioned fix is yet available. Leadership should treat this as a fleet-wide remediation and network-segmentation issue rather than a single-device patching task, since the affected estate spans wireless, video, and routing platforms.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include enforcing Layer 2 segmentation and 802.1X/port security on access ports, isolating wireless client traffic with client isolation and separate VLANs for guest and IoT devices, restricting east-west traffic between wireless, camera, and appliance segments with ACLs, limiting physical and RF proximity to access points and cameras, forwarding Meraki dashboard alerts to the SIEM for anomaly detection, and engaging Cisco TAC/Meraki support to obtain the vendor's internal hardening release and its product-by-product availability timeline.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Cisco Meraki MX/MR/MV widely deployed enterprise cloud-managed networking gear
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

48
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +48
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy