Skip to main content

Linux EUVDEUVD-2026-93217

| CVE-2026-98289
2026-10-06 Linux GHSA-3rq9-mjhw-q3g6
View
Monitor Track and reassess. Why: No CVSS yet + weak signal (CWE or non-zero EPSS).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisCVE.org

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

af_unix: Unify scc_index when finalising SCC in __unix_walk_scc().

Commit bfdb01283ee8 ("af_unix: Assign a unique index to SCC.") changed Tarjan's algorithm to update lowlink with lowlink, which is called lowpoint (unix_vertex.scc_index).

unix_vertex_dead() assumes all vertices in an SCC share the same lowpoint, but this is not always true if an SCC has two or more back edges, depending on the order of DFS.

For example, the graph below has two back edges from B to A and from C to B.

A --> B --> C ^ | ^ | ----' ----'

If DFS walks through A -> B -> C -> B (-> C -> B) -> A (-> B -> A), each index and scc_index will be updated as follows.

A --> B --> C C = (3, 3) (index, scc_index) B = (2, 2) A = (1, 1)

A ... B ... C C = (3, 2)<-. ^ | B = (2, 2) -' `----' A = (1, 1)

A ... B ... C C = (3, 2) ^ | . . B = (2, 1)<-. `----' .... A = (1, 1) -'

Then, unix_vertex_dead() thinks that B is passed to another SCC with scc_index 2, and the SCC is not garbage-collected.

This does not happen if DFS walks in a different order below or starts from B.

1 3 A --> B --> C ^ | ^ | ----' ----' 2 4

Let's unify scc_index across the SCC when finalising it.

Note that updating v->index was previously done in unix_scc_dead(), when called from __unix_walk_scc(), just to save one loop. Since __unix_walk_scc() now iterates over the SCC anyway, the update is moved back to __unix_walk_scc() and 'fast' argument is dropped.

Affected VersionsENISA

Linux 4090fa373f0e763c43610853d2774b5979915959 <4a4263dfeabad72f95e8ab6e15146861fa4144dd
Linux de7921631ff323369aa63a4324695ab54ea4047e
Linux 6.1.141 <6.2
Linux 4090fa373f0e763c43610853d2774b5979915959 <be550ee108ad80828aa61280400bedfc7e7c39d3
Linux 6.6.93 <6.7
Linux 5dfd283f4651d04dbb70ceb9ae5c4a30eda3c52a
Linux patch: 7.2.8
Linux patch: 6.18.54
Linux 4090fa373f0e763c43610853d2774b5979915959 <b8f71d69380a5fbc734c868acbeb560f1de1766f
Linux patch: 7.3-rc4
Linux patch: 0
Linux 6.10

Affected Packages

euvd linux fix: 6.2, 6.7

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 06, 2026 - 10:02 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 06, 2026 - 08:45 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 94% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity Not scored yet
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
No CVSS yet + weak signal (CWE or non-zero EPSS)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy