Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttacker holds System privilege
-
DeliveryCall vulnerable battery interface
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds write
-
ExecutionCorrupt privileged memory
-
ImpactEscalate to kernel/root
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold the System privilege on an affected MediaTek-chipset device (PR:H); it is a local-only escalation (AV:L) reachable by invoking the vulnerable battery component, which performs a write without a required bounds check. No user interaction is needed once System access is held (UI:N), and the issue is reachable in default configurations of the listed chipsets (e.g., MT6765, MT6768, MT6893, MT6991, MT8188, MT8196 and others). The principal limiting factor is the high pre-existing privilege requirement: an attacker without System-level access cannot reach the flaw, so it functions as a post-compromise escalation rather than an initial foothold. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but constrained local privilege-escalation issue rather than a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.7 (MEDIUM) is driven by an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) with AV:L (local), AC:L (low complexity), UI:N (no user interaction) and full C:H/I:H/A:H impact, but the decisive limiter is PR:H - the description explicitly states the attacker must 'already have obtained the System privilege.' This means the flaw is a privilege-escalation steppingstone (from System up to kernel/root), not an initial-access vector, so it only matters after an attacker has already achieved significant compromise. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV listing, or POC indicator is present in the supplied data: there is therefore no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. All signals are internally consistent (vendor-authored CVSS from MediaTek matches the local, high-privilege description), so there is no conflict to flag - the main caveat is simply that real-world risk hinges entirely on the attacker first holding the System privilege, which substantially narrows the practical threat. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already compromised an Android device to the point of holding the System privilege (e.g., via a malicious system-context app or a prior exploit) invokes the vulnerable battery interface with crafted input that triggers a missing bounds check. The resulting out-of-bounds write corrupts adjacent memory in the privileged battery component, allowing escalation from System to kernel-level control without any user interaction. No public proof-of-concept is available at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 05, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the battery component shipped with a wide range of MediaTek chipsets (including MT6765, MT6768, MT6853, MT6893, MT6991, MT8186, MT8188 and MT8196) allows an attacker who already holds System privilege to trigger an out-of-bounds write through a missing bounds check, yielding high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability. No user interaction is required once System access is held, and the flaw is reachable in default configurations of the listed chipsets, making it a post-compromise escalation rather than an initial foothold; the CVSS 6.7 score is dominated by the PR:H prerequisite. A vendor patch is available under MediaTek's October 2026 Product Security Bulletin (patch ID ALPS11276677, issue MSV-9217), and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply the MediaTek fix identified by patch ID ALPS11276677, distributed through the MediaTek October 2026 Product Security Bulletin (https://www.mediatek.com/product-security-bulletin/October-2026) - since MediaTek silicon patches are delivered inside OEM firmware, the practical action for defenders is to inventory affected devices by chipset and push the corresponding OEM security update; there is no standalone binary patch a user can install. If patching is delayed, recognize that the exploit precondition is already-holding System privilege, so the highest-value compensating controls are those that stop or detect an attacker from acquiring and abusing that privilege: enforce strict SELinux policy denying the System UID and untrusted app domains access to the battery/charger vendor nodes and ioctls (trade-off: overly broad restrictions can break battery statistics, charging-limit or health-reporting features, so test per device model), remove or gate vendor debug interfaces and engineering modes that expand the local attack surface (trade-off: reduces field diagnostics capability), and monitor for processes escalating from System to kernel context or for anomalous writes to battery-related kernel interfaces. On fully managed fleets, consider restricting which applications can hold privileged system permissions until the firmware update is available; do not rely on that alone, as the issue also matters in a post-compromise scenario.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The defect is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in the battery subsystem - the charging/battery-health driver or HAL that MediaTek ships for its modem/application processors and that Android vendors integrate into device firmware. A missing bounds check means a length, index or buffer-size value derived from battery/charger parameters is trusted when the write is performed, so a caller able to reach the relevant interface can write past the end of an allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory and potentially achieving code execution at the privilege of the battery component (typically kernel or a highly privileged system context). The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H and the independent assessment confirm the attacker must already possess the Android System privilege to invoke the vulnerable code path, the attack is local, no user interaction is needed, and the scope remains unchanged - the impact stays within the vulnerable component's security authority. The primary root cause is defensive-programming failure (absent or insufficient validation of an attacker-influenced value) rather than a design-level cryptographic or protocol flaw, which is why the practical limiting factor is the prerequisite System-level access and not the exploitability of the write itself.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only (AV:L) with no bounds check (AC:L, UI:N); requires pre-held System privilege so PR:H; OOB write yields full kernel-level C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (mediatek).
CVSS VectorVendor: mediatek
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In battery, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11276677; Issue ID: MSV-9217.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-92194
GHSA-4564-cmp3-frpg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB