Skip to main content

BigFix Service Management EUVDEUVD-2026-90874

| CVE-2026-56589 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-01 HCL GHSA-6pm7-6945-rv79
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: HCL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach injectable field in Service Management
  2. Delivery
    Store malicious script payload
  3. Exploit
    Victim operator views affected page
  4. Execution
    Script executes in victim browser session
  5. Impact
    Hijack session / exfiltrate sensitive data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) a stored/persistent input field in HCL BigFix Service Management that renders attacker-supplied content without output encoding, and (2) a victim subsequently viewing the page that displays the stored payload - the victim-view step (user interaction) is an inherent limiting factor despite the supplied vector's UI:N. The impact is bounded to the victim's browser/session context (session hijacking, theft of data the victim can access), not direct server compromise. Whether the injecting attacker needs authentication is not confirmed by the advisory; the supplied PR:N should be independently verified against the specific affected field. No affected/fixed version range is enumerated in the provided reference.

Impact

The input CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N = 7.2) is internally inconsistent with a stored XSS whose own description states the payload 'executes when a victim views the affected page' - that is textbook user interaction (UI:R), yet the vector claims UI:N. This inconsistency inflates the HCL-reported score; a UI:R assessment lands closer to the mid-6 range. PR:N is also questionable because persisting script typically requires at least a low-privileged account or a reachable input field, and the description does not confirm unauthenticated injection - treat the auth requirement as unconfirmed. On the exploitation-likelihood side, there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept provided, so this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - a low real-world-exploitation signal. Net: this is a genuine but not emergency issue. The confidentiality/integrity impacts are both Low and there is no availability impact; the scope change (S:C) reflects script crossing into the victim's browser/session rather than a catastrophic server compromise. Priority is moderate for environments running the affected HCL module, driven by the credible session-hijacking outcome, not by any evidence of active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker submits a crafted input containing a malicious script into a field of HCL BigFix Service Management that is later rendered without proper output encoding. When a legitimate user - often a help-desk operator or administrator - opens the page displaying that stored content, the script runs in their authenticated session, allowing session-token theft or exfiltration of data visible to that user. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the attack depends on a victim viewing the affected page.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker persist malicious script inside the application that executes in a victim's browser when the affected page is viewed, enabling session hijacking and theft of the data that victim can access. The CPE record (cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hcl_bigfix_service_management:*) does not enumerate a version range, so all deployments should be treated as potentially affected until the vendor advisory is reviewed. Impact is bounded to the victim's browser and session rather than server compromise, and exploitation depends on a victim subsequently rendering the stored payload; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released fix version is identified in the available data - the only reference is the HCL knowledge-base advisory KB0134015 (https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015), which must be consulted to obtain the exact patched build and affected version range; apply that vendor update as the primary remediation once confirmed, and do not assume a specific version number from this analysis. Until the patch is verified and deployed, the most effective compensating controls target the stored-payload rendering path: enforce contextual output encoding on every field that echoes user-supplied content back into HTML, and reject or sanitize markup on input as a defense-in-depth layer (side effect: legitimate rich-text or HTML-bearing fields may render incorrectly or be stripped, so validate field-by-field before broad enforcement). Restrict access to the specific BigFix Service Management pages that render stored user content to trusted, least-privilege accounts, understanding that this narrows the attack surface but does not remove the flaw. Set session cookies with HttpOnly and Secure attributes and shorten session lifetimes to blunt the session-hijacking outcome (trade-off: some client-side integrations that read cookies will break). Deploy a Content-Security-Policy that disallows inline and third-party script on the application, which can neutralize execution even when injection succeeds but may break embedded widgets and must be rolled out in report-only mode first. A WAF with XSS signatures can add short-term detection and blocking for known payload patterns, at the cost of false positives and trivial bypass via encoding, so it is not a substitute for the vendor fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

HCL BigFix Service Management Version 27

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This is a CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation, specifically the stored (persistent) variant. The root cause class is missing or incorrect output encoding of attacker-supplied content that a web application stores and later renders back into an HTML response; because the payload is persisted server-side, every user who loads the affected page becomes a potential execution target rather than only the injector. The relevant technology stack is the HCL BigFix Service Management web interface, per CPE cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hcl_bigfix_service_management:*, but the CPE uses a wildcard version, so no specific affected or fixed build can be confirmed from the supplied data. Notably, the supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N = 7.2) is internally inconsistent with the vulnerability's own description, which states the script executes 'when a victim views the affected page' - that is inherently UI:R. Our independent assessment therefore uses AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, treating the required victim page view as a genuine limiting factor and the required privilege level as unconfirmed: the advisory does not state whether the injecting party must be authenticated, so PR:N should not be repeated as fact without field-level verification. The scope-changed (S:C) rating is consistent with scripts executing in the victim's browser under the application's origin, affecting a security authority distinct from the vulnerable component, while the low confidentiality and integrity impacts reflect data exposure and page/session manipulation confined to that browser context.

Know when Hcl Bigfix Service Management gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Stored XSS requires a victim to view the page (UI:R) and typically some access to submit persisted content (PR:L); scope changes to the victim browser (S:C) with Low confidentiality/integrity and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorVendor: HCL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject and store malicious scripts within the application that execute when a victim views the affected page, enabling session hijacking and the theft of sensitive data.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that could enable session hijacking and unauthorized access to data available to affected users. With no vendor patch currently available, all deployments of the product are potentially at risk, and leadership should prioritize interim mitigations to protect sensitive information and maintain operational trust.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include WAF rules blocking XSS, strict CSP, input sanitization, output encoding, least-privilege access, and session monitoring. Apply vendor workarounds when available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise ITSM module within HCL BigFix product family
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2026-67105 HIGH
7.4 Oct 01

Interception of unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an on-path attac

CVE-2026-56592 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Sustained brute-force attacks against the HCL BigFix Service Management v27 login interface are possible because the pro

CVE-2026-56590 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unrestricted file upload in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker submit a crafted file through the product's u

CVE-2026-67101 MEDIUM
5.8 Sep 18

Server-side request forgery in the search functionality of HCL BigFix Service Management allows remote attackers to make

CVE-2026-67171 MEDIUM
5.3 Oct 01

An exposed API endpoint in HCL BigFix Service Management returns sensitive internal database information to remote, unau

CVE-2026-67106 MEDIUM
5.3 Oct 01

Information disclosure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive da

CVE-2026-67104 MEDIUM
5.3 Oct 01

Inspection of publicly served JavaScript in BigFix Service Management lets unauthenticated remote users discover hidden

CVE-2026-56597 MEDIUM
5.3 Sep 18

HCL BigFix Service Management exposes internal IP addresses through its own HTTP responses - response headers, error mes

CVE-2026-21848 MEDIUM
5.0 Sep 18

Cross-tenant data exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows an authenticated user with a valid account in one ten

CVE-2025-31980 MEDIUM
4.3 Oct 01

Input validation failures in HCL BigFix Service Management allow remote attackers to inject malformed data into the appl

CVE-2026-56595 MEDIUM
4.3 Sep 18

HCL BigFix Service Management ships with a CORS misconfiguration (CWE-942) in which Origin headers are improperly valida

CVE-2026-21806 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Administrative session hijacking in HCL BigFix Service Management Version 27 stems from the product allowing multiple si

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy