Skip to main content

Sliver C2 EUVDEUVD-2026-88743

| CVE-2026-102507 MEDIUM
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)
2026-09-29 VulnCheck GHSA-57xm-mfg7-58xm
6.8
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Control hostile/compromised implant session
  2. Delivery
    Operator issues Download command
  3. Exploit
    Implant returns zero-length/1-3 byte payload
  4. Execution
    OOB slice read panics BinaryMagic() PE parser
  5. Persist
    Unrecovered panic crosses gRPC interceptor
  6. Impact
    Teamserver process terminates, all operators disconnected

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to control an implant that has an active session with the Sliver teamserver (a hostile or compromised implant), and an operator must trigger a Download operation against that implant so the malformed response is parsed. Exploitation is thus gated by: prior establishment of an implant session (PR:L), operator interaction issuing a download (UI:A/required), and the teamserver running vulnerable Sliver 1.7.7 or earlier. It is not exploitable against a default fresh install with no connected malicious implant; the trigger is a zero-length or 1-3 byte Download response payload feeding the Binject BinaryMagic PE parser.

Impact

This is a genuine but bounded availability risk against a niche product. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VA:H, score 6.8) is availability-only - VC:N/VI:N confirm no confidentiality or integrity impact, so the 'Information Disclosure' tag is contradicted by the vendor's own vector. PR:L and the requirement that the attacker already control a compromised or hostile implant session substantially limit reach: this is not an internet-facing pre-auth flaw, but an abuse-of-trust condition where a subverted implant crashes the teamserver. A public POC exists (h00die/sliver_1.7.7_DoS) and the issue is VulnCheck-reported, but there is NO EPSS score and NO CISA KEV listing, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - POC availability and active exploitation are distinct signals. Notably, the threat model is inverted: the 'victim' is a red-team/adversary C2 operator, and the 'attacker' is typically the compromise target crashing the operator's teamserver. Net: real but low-to-medium priority - recoverable DoS, narrow trigger, niche footprint.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A defender (or malware analyst) who has identified a hostile Sliver implant on their network stands up a rogue/hostile implant session, or manipulates a compromised beacon, so that when a Sliver operator issues a Download command the implant returns a zero-length or 1-3 byte payload. This malformed response triggers an out-of-bounds slice read in the vendored Binject BinaryMagic() PE parser, panicking the teamserver and disconnecting all connected operators. Publicly available POC code (github.com/h00die/sliver_1.7.7_DoS) demonstrates the crash.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 29, 2026

Denial of service in Sliver C2 framework 1.7.7 and earlier allows an attacker who controls a compromised implant session to crash the entire teamserver by returning a malformed or zero-length Download response, disrupting all connected operators. Publicly available exploit code exists, but the provided data does not indicate confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV). The CVSS 4.0 score is 6.8 and the independently assessed CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, so this is a bounded availability impact requiring an established implant session and an operator-initiated download.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Bishop Fox Sliver to a version later than 1.7.7 once released; no exact patched version is specified in the provided references, so verify the VulnCheck advisory (https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sliver-denial-of-service-via-pe-parser-slice-bounds-in-operator-rpc) and upstream Sliver release notes for a fixed build. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, treat implants as untrusted and avoid issuing Download operations against implants that may be controlled by an adversary, since the trigger is a malformed download response parsed by Binject BinaryMagic. Restrict the operator gRPC listener to trusted management networks and enforce strong operator authentication to reduce exposure, recognizing that an already-compromised implant session can still send the hostile payload. Run the teamserver under a service manager configured to restart on failure, such as systemd Restart=always, to limit outage duration, with the trade-off that connected operators will be disconnected and unsaved state may be lost. Monitor for teamserver process crashes and unexpected gRPC disconnects.

Affected VersionsENISA

sliver 1.1.0 ≤1.7.7

Affected Packages

euvd sliver no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Sliver is an open-source command-and-control framework by Bishop Fox; operators interact with the teamserver over gRPC, and implants communicate back to the teamserver. The Download operator RPC parses file data returned by an implant using the vendored Binject library, specifically the BinaryMagic function, which examines PE headers. A zero-length or 1-3 byte payload provides insufficient data for the slice access, causing an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) and an unhandled panic. Because the panic occurs inside the operator gRPC interceptor chain and is not recovered, it terminates the teamserver process, affecting all operators. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates all Sliver versions through 1.7.7. Some tags label this buffer overflow or information disclosure, but the assessed CVSS 3.1 vector shows no confidentiality or integrity impact; the confirmed impact is availability.

Know when Sliver gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 5.7 MEDIUM

Network-reachable gRPC but attacker must hold an implant session (PR:L) and an operator must issue the download (UI:R); impact is teamserver crash only, so A:H with C:N/I:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Sliver C2 framework version 1.7.7 and earlier contains an unhandled panic vulnerability in the operator gRPC handler that allows an attacker controlling a compromised implant to crash the entire teamserver by returning a malformed or empty Download response. Attackers can send zero-length or 1-3 byte data payloads through a hostile implant session to trigger an out-of-bounds slice access in the vendored Binject library's BinaryMagic function, which propagates unrecovered through the operator gRPC interceptor chain and terminates the server process, affecting all connected operators.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 93% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
offensive-security C2 framework, red-team/pentest niche deployment
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

54
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy