Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS EUVDEUVD-2026-78084

| CVE-2026-12766 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-09-14 ibm GHSA-w3gg-r3w4-786c
5.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid Langflow user credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to Langflow OSS instance
  3. Exploit
    Craft SSRF payload targeting internal host or metadata endpoint
  4. Execution
    Submit payload via vulnerable workflow node or integration
  5. Persist
    Server issues outbound request to internal target
  6. Impact
    Receive response revealing internal network topology or credentials

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated user account on the Langflow OSS instance (PR:L per CVSS). The attack is network-based (AV:N) and requires no user interaction beyond the attacker's own actions (UI:N). Attack complexity is low (AC:L), meaning no race condition, special timing, or environmental configuration beyond authentication is needed. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the authentication requirement - unauthenticated access is not sufficient; (2) the scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning the vulnerability does not by itself cross privilege boundaries to compromise the underlying host OS; and (3) impact is bounded to limited confidentiality and integrity (C:L/I:L), with no direct availability impact (A:N). Non-default deployment behind an authenticating reverse proxy or restricted to a private network further limits real-world exploitability.

Impact

The CVSS 5.4 Medium score accurately reflects a constrained but real exposure: network-reachable, low complexity, but gated behind authenticated access (PR:L), which meaningfully limits the attacker population to registered or compromised users. The impact metrics of C:L and I:L reflect the indirect nature of SSRF - the attacker does not directly read arbitrary files or write data on the target, but rather co-opts the server's network identity to probe or interact with internal infrastructure. EPSS data is not included in the provided intelligence, and no CISA KEV listing exists, suggesting this is not under active mass exploitation. No public proof-of-concept has been identified. Taken together, even a mid-sized municipal IT team in ustka operating an internal Langflow deployment should treat this as a moderate priority remediation rather than an emergency response, particularly if the Langflow instance is already behind authentication and not exposed directly to the internet. The absence of a scope-change (S:U) in the CVSS vector is notable: while SSRF can sometimes pivot to full internal-network compromise, the scoring here constrains it to bounded impact, which is consistent with IBM's description of 'network enumeration or facilitating other attacks' rather than confirmed code execution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated Langflow user with access to a workflow node that accepts URL input supplies a crafted internal address (such as an AWS EC2 metadata endpoint or an intranet admin panel URL) as the target. The Langflow server fetches the attacker-supplied URL and the response - potentially containing internal credentials, host information, or service banners - is surfaced back to the attacker through the workflow output or an error message, enabling reconnaissance of the internal network.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 allows authenticated network attackers to induce the server to issue unauthorized HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations, enabling internal network enumeration or use of the server as a proxy to reach otherwise-isolated services. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-918 and is confirmed by IBM with a patch available at the vendor support page. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing have been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch is available per IBM's advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285639; administrators should consult that page for the exact fixed version and apply the upgrade immediately. The precise patched release version is not independently confirmed from the provided data, so the IBM support page should be consulted directly. As a compensating control prior to patching, operators should restrict network egress from the Langflow server host using firewall rules to prevent outbound connections to RFC-1918 addresses and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., block 169.254.169.254, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) - this reduces the blast radius of SSRF exploitation though it does not eliminate the vulnerability. Additionally, limiting Langflow user registration and access to only trusted internal users reduces the authenticated attacker population that could trigger the issue.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.11.2

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Langflow OSS is an open-source AI workflow orchestration platform that IBM distributes under the cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* CPE. SSRF (CWE-918) arises when the application accepts attacker-controlled URL or host input and uses it to initiate outbound server-side HTTP(S) requests without sufficiently validating or restricting the destination. In AI workflow platforms like Langflow, SSRF surface commonly exists in nodes or integrations that fetch external data sources, model endpoints, or webhooks - all of which are core to the platform's function. The protocol-level impact is typically against internal RFC-1918 address space, cloud metadata services (e.g., 169.254.169.254), or other intranet services not exposed to the attacker directly. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N) confirms network accessibility with low attack complexity and a low-privilege authentication requirement, yielding limited confidentiality and integrity impact without availability consequences.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Network-reachable SSRF gated behind authenticated access (PR:L); limited indirect confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability consequence, no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche AI workflow platform, IBM-specific distribution with limited adoption
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-93680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy