Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify victim username in alternate realm
-
ExploitAuthenticate to Kibana via attacker-controlled realm using matching username
-
ExecutionIssue Knowledge Base API requests scoped to shared username key
-
ImpactRead, overwrite, or delete victim's private AI Assistant Knowledge Base entries
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires all of the following: (1) the Kibana deployment must be configured with two or more distinct, simultaneously active authentication realms (e.g., LDAP and SAML); (2) two separate principals across those realms must coincidentally or deliberately share an identical username string; (3) at least one of those principals must have private Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base entries. The attacker requires valid credentials in one of the configured realms (PR:L) - exploitation is authenticated. The high attack complexity (AC:H) arises from the username-collision prerequisite, which the attacker cannot unilaterally manufacture without either prior knowledge of victim usernames or the ability to register an account in a second realm. Kibana deployments using a single authentication realm, or those where realm namespaces are enforced to be disjoint, are not exposed. Deployments not using the Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base feature are not exposed regardless of realm configuration. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N, scoring 4.2) reflects the constrained nature of this flaw accurately: AC:H captures the required coincidence of an identical username existing across two separate authentication realms, and C:L/I:L reflects impact bounded to AI Assistant Knowledge Base entries rather than broader Kibana or Elasticsearch data. EPSS data was not provided in the intelligence sources, and the vulnerability is absent from CISA KEV, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. Real-world risk is low-to-moderate and highly context-dependent - the triggering condition (username collision across distinct realms) is uncommon in well-managed identity environments but plausible in organizations federating multiple identity providers without enforcing disjoint namespaces; even a mid-sized municipal IT team in inowroclaw running a dual-realm Elastic deployment would only face exposure if their LDAP and SAML realms happened to contain overlapping usernames. The impact is further constrained to the AI Assistant Knowledge Base feature, not the broader data plane. The absence of any public POC or KEV listing supports deprioritization relative to other high-CVSS findings, though organizations operating multi-realm Kibana deployments should patch promptly given the low barrier to exploitation once the username-collision condition exists. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker authenticates to Kibana with a low-privilege account (e.g., via SAML) using the username 'jsmith'. A separate, unrelated user also named 'jsmith' has authenticated via a different realm (e.g., LDAP) and maintains a private Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base containing sensitive operational notes or AI context data. The attacker exploits the realm-blind authorization logic to retrieve, alter, or destroy the victim's Knowledge Base entries - requiring no credentials from the victim's realm and no elevated privileges beyond their own valid login. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 01, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Kibana's Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base allows an authenticated user to read, modify, and delete private Knowledge Base entries belonging to a different user when both principals share an identical username value but originate from distinct authentication realms. Elastic advisory ESA-2026-142 confirms the flaw across multiple 8.x and 9.x release lines, with fixed versions 8.19.21, 9.4.6, and 9.5.2 released. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability does not appear in CISA KEV; exploitation is gated by a high-complexity prerequisite - a username collision across separately configured authentication realms - which significantly limits the exposed population.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Kibana to version 8.19.21, 9.4.6, or 9.5.2 as applicable, per Elastic advisory ESA-2026-142 at https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-8-19-21-9-4-6-9-5-2-security-update-esa-2026-142/390093. For deployments that cannot patch immediately, administrators should audit all configured authentication realms and enforce disjoint username namespaces - for example, by requiring realm-prefixed usernames (e.g., ldap_jsmith vs. saml_jsmith) at the identity provider level; this eliminates the collision condition entirely but may require identity provider reconfiguration and user-facing changes. Alternatively, consolidating to a single authentication realm removes the cross-realm attack surface, though this may not be operationally feasible in federated enterprise environments. Disabling the Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base feature entirely eliminates the vulnerable surface if the feature is not operationally required, at the cost of losing AI-assisted analytics capability for all users.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Kibana (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:elastic:kibana:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is the visualization and management frontend for the Elastic Stack, supporting multi-realm authentication where users may authenticate via distinct providers simultaneously (e.g., native, LDAP, SAML). The Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base feature stores per-user private entries for AI-assisted analytics workflows. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) describes failures where authorization decisions are made without adequately distinguishing between principals that share attribute values across trust boundaries. Here, Kibana's authorization logic appears to use the username string as the lookup key for Knowledge Base ownership without scoping that key to the originating realm, creating a principal-confusion condition. CAPEC-1 (Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs) applies because the ACL boundary separating realm-distinct users of the same username is not enforced at the Knowledge Base access layer.
Know when Kibana gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
AC:H reflects the prerequisite username collision across distinct realms; PR:L because valid credentials in one realm are required; C:L/I:L bounded to AI Assistant KB entries; A:N since entry deletion does not constitute systemic availability loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (elastic).
CVSS VectorVendor: elastic
DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized disclosure, modification, and deletion of data via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Where two authenticated principals originating from different authentication realms share the same username value, one could read, modify, and delete the other's private Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base entries.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Kibana versions before 5.6.15 and 6.6.1 contain an arbitrary code execution flaw in the Timelion visualizer. Rated criti
Kibana versions 6.7.0 to 6.8.8 and 7.0.0 to 7.6.2 contain a prototype pollution flaw in the Upgrade Assistant. Rated hig
Kibana versions before 6.4.3 and 5.6.13 contain an arbitrary file inclusion flaw in the Console plugin. Rated critical s
Prototype pollution in Kibana leads to arbitrary code execution via a crafted file upload and specifically crafted HTTP
Kibana versions 4.0 to 4.6, 5.0 to 5.6.12, and 6.0 to 6.4.2 contain an error in the way authorization credentials are us
A Prototype pollution vulnerability in Kibana leads to arbitrary code execution via crafted HTTP requests to machine lea
Kibana versions before 6.6.1 contain an arbitrary code execution flaw in the security audit logger. Rated critical sever
Prototype Pollution in Kibana can lead to code injection via unrestricted file upload combined with path traversal. Rate
Authorization bypass in Kibana's Fleet package installation process lets an authenticated user who holds delegated Fleet
Privilege escalation in Elastic Kibana's Agent Builder component (versions 9.4.0-9.4.3) allows authenticated low-privile
A deserialization issue in Kibana can lead to arbitrary code execution when Kibana attempts to parse a YAML document con
Kibana version 8.7.0 contains an arbitrary code execution flaw. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
EUVD-2026-69572
GHSA-r25h-rqj8-hg2m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB