Skip to main content

Armeria EUVDEUVD-2026-62218

| CVE-2026-11751 CRITICAL
2026-08-19 LY-Corporation
9.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: LY-Corporation
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain man-in-the-middle position on upstream path
  2. Delivery
    Intercept xDS-managed TLS connection
  3. Exploit
    Present spoofed upstream certificate
  4. Execution
    Client skips peer verification
  5. Persist
    Decrypt and tamper with traffic
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate or alter upstream data

Vulnerability Assessment

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the application uses the armeria-xds module and that upstream TLS peer verification is in the silently-disabled state for the targeted xDS-managed upstream connection (the advisory describes verification being silently turned off for xDS-configured upstreams). The attacker must additionally hold an active man-in-the-middle position on the network path between the Armeria client and that upstream - this is the AT:P attack-requirement and AC:H high-complexity limiter. Limiting factors: only xDS-managed upstream connections are in scope (deployments without armeria-xds or without xDS-driven upstream TLS are unaffected), the attacker needs network path interception rather than direct access to the host, and the flaw is fixed in 1.41.0 so patched deployments are not exposed. No end-user interaction is required (UI:N) and no authentication to the target is required (PR:N).

Impact

The published CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N) scores 9.1 (Critical), reflecting high confidentiality and integrity impact with no availability impact and no scope/subsequent-system change. Two metrics meaningfully constrain real-world risk: AC:H and AT:P indicate the attack is not trivially repeatable and requires specific attack prerequisites - namely an active man-in-the-middle position on the upstream path, which is the classic limiting factor for MITM bugs. There is no EPSS score, no KEV listing, and no evidence of a public POC in the provided data, so this is best treated as a serious latent trust-boundary weakness rather than an actively exploited threat. The 9.1 magnitude is driven by impact severity (full read/tamper of upstream traffic), not by ease or breadth of exploitation; prioritize patching wherever armeria-xds terminates TLS to sensitive upstreams, but note exploitation realistically requires network-adjacency or path control that a strong internal network posture already limits.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can position themselves on the network path between an armeria-xds client and one of its xDS-managed upstream services (for example a compromised host, rogue router, or ARP/DNS spoofer inside the service-mesh network) presents a fraudulent server certificate. Because peer verification is silently disabled for that upstream, the Armeria client accepts the connection and the attacker transparently proxies, decrypts, and modifies application traffic. No public POC is identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS AC:H/AT:P metrics reflect that the attacker must already control or intercept the connection path.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Man-in-the-middle exposure in LINE's Armeria (armeria-xds module) versions prior to 1.41.0, where TLS peer (certificate) verification on xDS-managed upstream connections can be silently disabled, causing the client to trust unauthenticated or spoofed upstreams. Any attacker positioned on the network path between an armeria-xds client and its xDS-configured upstream service can intercept, read, and tamper with traffic that operators believe is protected by TLS. Reported by LY-Corporation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade the Armeria armeria-xds dependency to version 1.41.0 or later, which restores proper upstream TLS peer verification; this is the primary and recommended fix. Review the GitHub advisory GHSA-6qfw-3mvj-m6v5 and the LINE security advisory blog (https://line.github.io/security-advisory-blog/CVE-2026-11751/) for exact guidance. If immediate upgrade is not possible, the concrete compensating step is to explicitly assert/enforce upstream TLS certificate validation in your xDS-supplied TLS contexts (e.g., ensure a validation context with a trusted CA/trust bundle is set on every upstream cluster rather than relying on defaults), and audit xDS control-plane responses to confirm peer verification is actually being applied - the trade-off is that this requires control-plane configuration changes and does not fix any code path where verification is silently dropped. As a network-layer mitigation, restrict and harden the paths between armeria-xds clients and their upstreams (segmented networks, mutual TLS at the infrastructure layer, no untrusted intermediaries) to reduce MITM opportunity, at the cost of added operational complexity.

Affected VersionsENISA

Armeria patch: 1.41.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Armeria is an open-source asynchronous JVM microservices/RPC framework developed by LINE (LY Corporation). The armeria-xds module implements the xDS (x Discovery Service) protocol suite used by Envoy-style service meshes to dynamically distribute cluster, endpoint, listener, and TLS configuration to data-plane clients at runtime. The root cause is an improper-certificate-validation class weakness (functionally CWE-295, though the record lists CWE as N/A): under certain dynamic xDS configurations the upstream TLS context is applied without enforcing peer certificate verification, so the client establishes 'TLS' sessions without authenticating the server's identity. Because upstream TLS parameters are pushed dynamically via xDS rather than statically configured, an operator can be unaware that verification silently defaulted to off.

Know when Armeria gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (LY-Corporation) PRIMARY 9.1 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.4 HIGH

MITM needs an active on-path position (AC:H) but no auth or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N); attacker can read and tamper upstream traffic (C:H/I:H) with no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (LY-Corporation).

CVSS VectorVendor: LY-Corporation

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been identified in armeria-xds versions prior to 1.41.0, where xDS upstream TLS peer verification may be silently disabled, allowing man-in-the-middle attacks against xDS-managed upstream connections.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Armeria application framework (versions prior to 1.41.0) contains a critical vulnerability where encrypted inter-service communication can be silently intercepted and modified by network-positioned attackers with no alerting to operations teams. Organizations must assume their service-to-service traffic confidentiality and integrity are compromised until patched, creating data protection and potential regulatory violations.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: network segmentation limiting xDS control plane access to trusted infrastructure; application-layer mutual TLS enforcement between services; network monitoring for anomalous TLS negotiation; certificate pinning on critical upstream connections; manual validation testing of TLS verification behavior; restrict administrative access to Armeria configuration.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche xDS integration module of a JVM microservices framework
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy