Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local access to WSF host
-
DeliveryDeploy unprivileged malicious process in Ring 3
-
ExploitWait for privileged user session to become active
-
ExecutionTrigger protection mechanism failure in WSF
-
ImpactEscalate process privileges on vulnerable system
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires ALL of the following concurrent conditions: (1) local access to the affected host - remote network exploitation is not possible per AV:L; (2) the Intel Workload Services Framework software must be installed and running; (3) a privileged user (PR:H) must be actively present or interacting with the system in a passive manner (UI:P - the user does not need to take a specific action but must have an active privileged session); (4) specific attack requirements must be present in the environment (AT:P), meaning an environmental or configuration precondition beyond the attacker's direct control must hold. The description specifies this occurs 'without special internal knowledge', meaning deep vulnerability knowledge is not required once the preconditions are met. Exploitation is LIMITED by: the requirement for local access (no remote exploitation), the mandatory presence of a highly privileged user session, and unspecified AT:P environmental conditions that must align. There is no indication that default-configuration deployments lacking co-resident privileged sessions are vulnerable in practice. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.4 (Medium) is materially lower than the C:H/I:H/A:H impact metrics would suggest in isolation, principally because three friction factors constrain exploitation: AV:L (local access only, eliminating remote attack surface), PR:H (a highly privileged user account must be present and interacting), and AT:P (specific attack requirements must be pre-existing in the environment). These combined constraints mean this is NOT a remote, opportunistic, or unauthenticated threat. EPSS data was not supplied, so exploitation probability is unknown. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and no POC has been identified, lowering immediate urgency. The absence of subsequent-system impact (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) means lateral movement or supply-chain contamination via this vector is not indicated. Real-world priority is LOW-TO-MEDIUM: organizations running Intel Workload Services Framework in environments where untrusted code shares a host with privileged users should patch, but this is not an emergency response item for most environments. The PR:H prerequisite is the critical gating factor - if privileged users are not co-located with untrusted workloads, the attack surface is negligible. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local attacker deploys a malicious unprivileged process on a host running Intel Workload Services Framework - for instance, within a shared compute node - and waits for a privileged administrator to perform routine activity on the same system (passive user interaction). When the required attack preconditions are met and the privileged user session is active, the malicious process exploits the protection mechanism failure in the Ring 3 software layer to escalate its own privileges, achieving full system compromise. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so exploitation likely requires custom tooling with knowledge of the specific protection mechanism failure. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026
Privilege escalation in Intel Workload Services Framework software affects the Ring 3 user-application layer, where a protection mechanism failure (CWE-693) allows an unprivileged process to gain elevated privileges when a concurrently active privileged user provides passive interaction. The attack is local, requires attack prerequisites to be met (AT:P per CVSS 4.0), and achieves full compromise of the vulnerable system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis; this is a vendor-disclosed advisory via INTEL-SA-01467.
RemediationAI
The primary remediation is to apply the update detailed in Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-01467, available at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01467.html. The advisory is the authoritative source for exact patched version numbers, which were not extractable from the available intelligence at time of analysis - consult the advisory directly to identify the target upgrade version. As a compensating control pending patching, restrict co-execution of untrusted workloads on hosts where privileged users are actively authenticated, since PR:H and UI:P are mandatory prerequisites; removing the opportunity for passive privileged-user interaction eliminates the exploitation path. Additionally, applying least-privilege principles to workload scheduling - ensuring untrusted Ring 3 processes do not run on the same host as privileged administrative sessions - reduces attack surface. These controls impose scheduling constraints that may affect workload density; weigh against operational requirements.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Intel Workload Services Framework is enterprise-grade Intel software for managing and orchestrating computational workloads across data-center and cloud environments. The vulnerability resides in Ring 3 (user-mode application space) of the x86/x64 privilege ring architecture: Ring 3 is the least-privileged execution domain, isolated from kernel (Ring 0) by hardware memory protection. A protection mechanism failure (CWE-693) occurs when a security control intended to prevent privilege escalation is bypassed or absent - in this context, a user-space component fails to enforce proper privilege boundaries, permitting escalation beyond the Ring 3 trust boundary. The CPE string 'cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_workload_services_framework_software:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*' indicates all versions of the named software are potentially in scope, with the precise affected range deferred to the vendor advisory at INTEL-SA-01467.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local vector and high privilege requirement per description and CVSS 4.0 source; UI:R maps from UI:P; no scope change since subsequent-system impacts are all None.
Primary rating from Vendor (intel).
CVSS VectorVendor: intel
DescriptionCVE.org
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Workload Services Framework software within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2026-56526
GHSA-xpj3-v38p-4r3c
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB