Skip to main content

Intel AI Containers EUVDEUVD-2026-56510

| CVE-2026-20903 MEDIUM
Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693)
2026-08-11 intel GHSA-3hgc-rfpq-fm5j
5.4
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: intel
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege access to container
  2. Delivery
    Identify AT:P attack conditions present
  3. Exploit
    Exploit Ring 3 protection mechanism failure
  4. Execution
    Await or induce passive user interaction
  5. Persist
    Escalate privileges within container system
  6. Impact
    Access full CIA of container environment

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires all of the following: local access to the affected Intel AI Container environment (AV:L - no remote exploitation path is indicated); an existing high-privilege account within the container (PR:H - exploitation by a low or unprivileged user is not supported by the CVSS vector); passive user interaction (UI:P - some incidental user action is required, not zero-click); and specific attack requirements must be present (AT:P - not all deployments running a vulnerable version are automatically exploitable, a particular configuration or environmental state must exist). What limits exploitation: the PR:H requirement means an attacker who cannot first obtain high privileges within the container cannot trigger this flaw; AT:P means deployments not meeting the undisclosed specific conditions are not vulnerable; UI:P means fully automated exploitation without any user involvement is not confirmed. The precise AT:P condition is not disclosed in available intelligence - consult INTEL-SA-01461 for specifics.

Impact

Despite reporting full CIA impact on the vulnerable system, the CVSS 4.0 score of 5.4 accurately reflects the compounding mitigating factors: local access only (AV:L), attack requirements must be present (AT:P - not universally exploitable), existing high privileges required (PR:H), and passive user interaction needed (UI:P). This is a case where raw impact metrics are high but the attack surface is tightly scoped. An adversary must already be a privileged user within the container environment, limiting meaningful risk to deployments where untrusted or semi-trusted users are granted elevated container privileges - a non-default and operationally unusual posture. No EPSS data was provided in the intelligence feed. No KEV listing and no POC exist at time of analysis, further supporting that this is a low-urgency, conditional finding. The absence of subsequent system impact (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) indicates that container escape to the host is not within scope of this vulnerability as described - the impact is bounded to the container system itself.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with an existing high-privilege account within an Intel AI Container (prior to v0.4.0) identifies the specific configuration or environmental condition satisfying AT:P requirements, then exploits the protection mechanism failure in the Ring 3 user application space - potentially waiting for or triggering a passive user interaction - to escalate privileges further within the container, achieving full control over its data and operations. No public POC exists at time of analysis, so exploitation likely requires detailed knowledge of the container's internal protection mechanisms.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Privilege escalation in Intel AI Containers before v0.4.0 exposes a protection mechanism failure (CWE-693) within the Ring 3 user application layer, enabling a local attacker already holding high privileges to further escalate privileges with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the vulnerable system. Exploitation requires passive user interaction and specific attack conditions (AT:P), substantially limiting the realistic attack population to multi-tenant AI container deployments where privileged users must be constrained. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability does not appear in CISA KEV at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Intel AI Containers to version v0.4.0 or later, per Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-01461 available at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01461.html. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict access to the AI container environment to only fully trusted users - since exploitation requires existing high privileges (PR:H), enforcing strict least-privilege provisioning (avoiding unnecessary privileged grants within the container) eliminates the precondition for exploitation. Additionally, review and audit which users or service accounts hold elevated roles within container instances and revoke unnecessary permissions; this reduces exposure with no functional side effects for most workloads. Monitor container privilege events via host-level audit logging during the remediation window to detect any attempted exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Intel(R) AI Containers before version v0.4.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Intel AI Containers are containerized runtime environments optimized for AI and machine learning workloads on Intel hardware. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) indicates that a security control - likely a container isolation boundary, capability restriction, or access control enforcement mechanism - fails to operate correctly within Ring 3, the least privileged CPU execution ring (user application space). Rather than a hardware-level or hypervisor flaw, this is an application-layer vulnerability where the container's own protection mechanisms can be subverted. The CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_ai_containers) classifies this as an application product. The CVSS 4.0 AT:P (attack requirements present) metric confirms that exploitation is not possible in all deployed configurations - specific environmental or configuration conditions must exist for the attack path to be viable.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (intel) PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.3 MEDIUM

Local vector, attack requirements (AT:P) map to AC:H, existing high privileges required per description, user interaction required, no scope change given zero subsequent system impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (intel).

CVSS VectorVendor: intel

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Containers before version v0.4.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
specialized Intel AI workload container, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy