Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privilege access to container
-
DeliveryIdentify AT:P attack conditions present
-
ExploitExploit Ring 3 protection mechanism failure
-
ExecutionAwait or induce passive user interaction
-
PersistEscalate privileges within container system
-
ImpactAccess full CIA of container environment
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires all of the following: local access to the affected Intel AI Container environment (AV:L - no remote exploitation path is indicated); an existing high-privilege account within the container (PR:H - exploitation by a low or unprivileged user is not supported by the CVSS vector); passive user interaction (UI:P - some incidental user action is required, not zero-click); and specific attack requirements must be present (AT:P - not all deployments running a vulnerable version are automatically exploitable, a particular configuration or environmental state must exist). What limits exploitation: the PR:H requirement means an attacker who cannot first obtain high privileges within the container cannot trigger this flaw; AT:P means deployments not meeting the undisclosed specific conditions are not vulnerable; UI:P means fully automated exploitation without any user involvement is not confirmed. The precise AT:P condition is not disclosed in available intelligence - consult INTEL-SA-01461 for specifics. |
| Impact | Despite reporting full CIA impact on the vulnerable system, the CVSS 4.0 score of 5.4 accurately reflects the compounding mitigating factors: local access only (AV:L), attack requirements must be present (AT:P - not universally exploitable), existing high privileges required (PR:H), and passive user interaction needed (UI:P). This is a case where raw impact metrics are high but the attack surface is tightly scoped. An adversary must already be a privileged user within the container environment, limiting meaningful risk to deployments where untrusted or semi-trusted users are granted elevated container privileges - a non-default and operationally unusual posture. No EPSS data was provided in the intelligence feed. No KEV listing and no POC exist at time of analysis, further supporting that this is a low-urgency, conditional finding. The absence of subsequent system impact (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) indicates that container escape to the host is not within scope of this vulnerability as described - the impact is bounded to the container system itself. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with an existing high-privilege account within an Intel AI Container (prior to v0.4.0) identifies the specific configuration or environmental condition satisfying AT:P requirements, then exploits the protection mechanism failure in the Ring 3 user application space - potentially waiting for or triggering a passive user interaction - to escalate privileges further within the container, achieving full control over its data and operations. No public POC exists at time of analysis, so exploitation likely requires detailed knowledge of the container's internal protection mechanisms. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026
Privilege escalation in Intel AI Containers before v0.4.0 exposes a protection mechanism failure (CWE-693) within the Ring 3 user application layer, enabling a local attacker already holding high privileges to further escalate privileges with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the vulnerable system. Exploitation requires passive user interaction and specific attack conditions (AT:P), substantially limiting the realistic attack population to multi-tenant AI container deployments where privileged users must be constrained. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability does not appear in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Intel AI Containers to version v0.4.0 or later, per Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-01461 available at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01461.html. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict access to the AI container environment to only fully trusted users - since exploitation requires existing high privileges (PR:H), enforcing strict least-privilege provisioning (avoiding unnecessary privileged grants within the container) eliminates the precondition for exploitation. Additionally, review and audit which users or service accounts hold elevated roles within container instances and revoke unnecessary permissions; this reduces exposure with no functional side effects for most workloads. Monitor container privilege events via host-level audit logging during the remediation window to detect any attempted exploitation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Intel AI Containers are containerized runtime environments optimized for AI and machine learning workloads on Intel hardware. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) indicates that a security control - likely a container isolation boundary, capability restriction, or access control enforcement mechanism - fails to operate correctly within Ring 3, the least privileged CPU execution ring (user application space). Rather than a hardware-level or hypervisor flaw, this is an application-layer vulnerability where the container's own protection mechanisms can be subverted. The CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_ai_containers) classifies this as an application product. The CVSS 4.0 AT:P (attack requirements present) metric confirms that exploitation is not possible in all deployed configurations - specific environmental or configuration conditions must exist for the attack path to be viable.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local vector, attack requirements (AT:P) map to AC:H, existing high privileges required per description, user interaction required, no scope change given zero subsequent system impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (intel).
CVSS VectorVendor: intel
DescriptionCVE.org
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Containers before version v0.4.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2026-56510
GHSA-3hgc-rfpq-fm5j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB