Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCompromise vendor update server
-
DeliveryServe trojanized Supsystic Pro package
-
ExploitSite installs/updates plugin
-
ExecutionFetch second-stage payload
-
PersistExfiltrate credentials and sensitive data
-
ImpactGain full site control
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Hidden functionality detection
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The concrete prerequisite is that the site installed or updated to a Supsystic Pro plugin version served from the vendor's update server during the compromise window - the malicious code arrives through the legitimate update mechanism, so the 'condition' is possession of the poisoned build rather than any attacker-side network position. What limits exploitation: only sites running the affected Supsystic Pro plugins (paid Pro editions) during that window are impacted, so sites that never installed Pro or that pinned to a version predating the compromise are unaffected. Once the poisoned version is present, exploitation is unauthenticated and needs no further victim interaction (consistent with PR:N/UI:N). The exact affected version range and compromise window are not specified in the available data and must be taken from the WPScan/vendor advisory. |
| Impact | The CVSS 9.8 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects the outcome - full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss with no authentication or user interaction - but it under-describes the actual delivery: exploitation does not come from an attacker reaching an exposed network service, it comes from a site having installed a poisoned update, so the real precondition is 'ran the compromised Supsystic Pro version', not 'is reachable over the network'. No EPSS score, no KEV listing, and no POC were provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation signals are absent; however, for a supply-chain implant EPSS and POC are weak proxies because the malicious code is already resident on victims rather than something that must be exploited remotely. This should be treated as a high priority for any environment running Supsystic Pro, since compromise is presumed on affected versions rather than merely possible. The single tag 'Information Disclosure' understates impact - the description states full site control, not just data exposure - so defenders should not de-prioritize based on that tag. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A site administrator installs or auto-updates a Supsystic Pro plugin, unknowingly pulling the trojanized package from the compromised update server; the embedded code then reaches out and downloads a second-stage payload that steals stored credentials and gives the attacker persistent administrative control of the site. No user interaction beyond the routine update is required and no authentication barrier stops the implant, since it runs as trusted plugin code. No public POC is referenced in the available data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 06, 2026
Supply-chain compromise of the Supsystic Pro WordPress plugin family delivered trojanized plugin updates from the vendor's own compromised update server, giving unauthenticated attackers a foothold on every site that pulled the poisoned release. The embedded malicious code fetches a second-stage payload that harvests credentials and other sensitive data and hands the operator full control of the affected WordPress site. Reported by WPScan; no public exploit is identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV at time of analysis, though the delivery mechanism means the implant is effectively pre-planted rather than requiring an active attack against each target.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patched version is identified at time of analysis, and because this is a distribution-channel compromise rather than a code bug, simply 'updating' is not automatically safe until the vendor confirms a clean release served from a secured server - treat any Supsystic Pro update pulled during the compromise window as suspect. Immediately identify and remove or disable the affected Supsystic Pro plugins, then, because credentials were exfiltrated and full site control was possible, rotate all WordPress admin and database passwords, API keys, and secret salts, and audit for unknown admin users, unexpected scheduled tasks, and injected PHP files rather than trusting the site is clean after removal. Where the functionality is business-critical, isolate the site as a stopgap - block outbound connections to unknown hosts to cut the second-stage download and exfiltration channel, and restrict wp-admin access by IP - while awaiting a vendor-confirmed clean build; note the trade-off that outbound blocking may also break legitimate plugin update and license checks. Consult the WPScan advisory (https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7ca5ad30-1792-4014-bfad-88911cd64713/) and the vendor's own incident notice for the confirmed clean version once published.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Supsystic Pro line of commercial WordPress plugins (the vendor ships several, e.g. popup, data-tables, and membership products). The root cause is not a traditional defect in the plugin's own logic but a distribution-channel compromise: the vendor's update server served plugin packages containing embedded malicious code, so WordPress's normal update flow installed attacker code as trusted plugin files. No CWE was supplied in the input, but the behavior maps to the embedded-malicious-code / supply-chain classes (conceptually CWE-506 Embedded Malicious Code, plus reliance on an untrusted upstream distribution channel). Because the code executes inside the WordPress PHP runtime, it inherits full application privileges and database access, which is why it can stage a second payload and exfiltrate credentials.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Trojanized code runs as trusted plugin with no auth or interaction and yields full site control, so PR:N/UI:N and C/I/A all High; scope kept Unchanged as impact stays within the WordPress instance.
Primary rating from Vendor (wpscan).
CVSS VectorVendor: wpscan
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Multiple Supsystic Pro plugins were distributed with malicious code through the vendor's compromised update server, allowing unauthenticated attackers to deploy a second-stage payload that exfiltrates credentials and other sensitive data and grants full control of affected sites.
Executive ViewAI
The Supsystic Pro WordPress plugin family delivered malware through the vendor's compromised update server, installing credential-stealing backdoors on every site that applied the poisoned updates. Affected organizations face immediate risks of data theft, site takeover, and cascade compromise of connected systems.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim controls: Remove the affected plugin immediately from all WordPress instances and maintain removal until a verified patched version becomes available. Rotate all credentials for WordPress administrators, databases, and integrated services. Deploy file integrity monitoring and intrusion detection systems to identify post-exploitation artifacts. Implement WAF rules to block known malware command-and-control signatures. Maintain enhanced logging and real-time alerting on web application activity. Prepare incident response and breach notification procedures based on forensic findings of data exposure scope.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-54200
GHSA-8x7c-xgmw-fg3x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB