Skip to main content

XClarity Orchestrator EUVDEUVD-2026-52885

| CVE-2026-16792 HIGH
Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)
2026-08-04 lenovo GHSA-hqj6-mx68-28jm
7.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: lenovo
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent network access
  2. Delivery
    Position as MitM on LXCO segment
  3. Exploit
    Wait for triggering TLS handshake condition
  4. Execution
    Present forged certificate accepted by vulnerable microservice
  5. Impact
    Decrypt and capture sensitive inter-service communications

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Certificate validation
Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must have network adjacency to the LXCO deployment - physical co-location on the same Layer-2 segment, VLAN membership, or equivalent network proximity that allows traffic interception. The vulnerability only activates 'under certain circumstances' during TLS certificate validation, indicating a non-default or transient triggering condition whose exact nature Lenovo has not publicly disclosed; AT:P in the CVSS 4.0 vector confirms specific attack requirements exist beyond mere adjacency. Exploitation is limited to passive confidentiality interception (no integrity or availability impact). Remote unauthenticated attackers on the internet cannot exploit this; it is strictly constrained to the local network segment. The attacker requires no authentication to LXCO itself (PR:N), but must already have a foothold capable of intercepting Layer-2 or Layer-3 traffic on the management network.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.0 reflects meaningful but bounded risk. The adjacent network vector (AV:A) is the critical limiting factor: the attacker must reside on the same Layer-2 segment or adjacent network as the LXCO deployment, ruling out remote internet-based exploitation. AT:P indicates specific attack preconditions exist - the description's qualifier 'under certain circumstances' corroborates this; the exact triggering conditions are not publicly specified by Lenovo. The confidentiality impact is significant: VC:H and SC:H together indicate that intercepted data could contain secrets spanning the vulnerable system and downstream managed infrastructure. Integrity and availability are unaffected (VI:N, VA:N, VA:N), which is consistent with a passive interception-only attack rather than active manipulation. No EPSS score was provided in the intelligence sources, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. No KEV listing and no public POC means this is not currently a mass-exploitation target. For organizations running LXCO in shared or multi-tenant data center environments where network adjacency to untrusted parties is possible - such as colocation facilities - risk is materially elevated versus isolated private deployments.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with access to the same network segment as LXCO - such as a malicious insider, a compromised server in a shared rack, or an attacker who has pivoted onto the management VLAN - intercepts HTTPS traffic between LXCO microservices during a specific triggering condition in TLS certificate validation. By presenting a forged certificate, the attacker decrypts and reads sensitive orchestration data such as administrative credentials, API tokens, or hardware management commands. No public POC exists at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 04, 2026

Improper TLS certificate validation in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) 2.2.0 microservices exposes sensitive management communications to interception by an adjacent network attacker capable of positioning themselves for a machine-in-the-middle attack. The flaw (CWE-295) allows the attacker to bypass HTTPS trust enforcement under unspecified triggering circumstances, potentially capturing credentials, tokens, or orchestration data exchanged between LXCO microservices. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis; Lenovo has released a patch via advisory HT509976.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch per Lenovo Security Advisory HT509976, available at https://support.lenovo.com/my/en/solutions/ht509976-lenovo-xclarity-orchestrator. The exact patched version number is not specified in available intelligence sources and must be confirmed by consulting the advisory directly - do not assume a specific version without verifying. As a compensating control pending patching, restrict network adjacency to LXCO management interfaces by placing LXCO nodes on a dedicated, isolated management VLAN accessible only to authorized administrators; this eliminates the adjacent-network attack surface required by AV:A. Additionally, enforce strict network ACLs on switch infrastructure serving the LXCO segment to prevent unauthorized devices from joining that broadcast domain. These controls reduce exploitation opportunity but do not remediate the underlying certificate validation defect.

Affected VersionsENISA

XClarity Orchestrator 0 ≤2.2.0

Affected Packages

euvd xclarity_orchestrator no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator is an enterprise data center infrastructure management platform that coordinates Lenovo ThinkSystem and ThinkAgile hardware through a microservices architecture. The vulnerability stems from CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), a class of flaw where TLS handshake logic fails to correctly verify the authenticity of a peer's X.509 certificate - enabling an attacker controlling the network path to present a forged certificate without rejection. Because LXCO is composed of multiple loosely-coupled microservices that communicate internally over HTTPS, a single point of certificate validation failure can expose inter-service traffic, not merely end-user sessions. The CPE (cpe:2.3:a:lenovo:xclarity_orchestrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) uses a wildcard version, suggesting NVD has not yet bounded the affected version range beyond the vendor-disclosed 2.2.0 baseline.

Know when Xclarity Orchestrator gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (lenovo) PRIMARY 7.0 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Adjacent-only vector; AC:H for unspecified triggering conditions; scope changed because subsequent system confidentiality is also impacted per SC:H in the 4.0 vector.

3.1 AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (lenovo).

CVSS VectorVendor: lenovo

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Aug 04, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Aug 04, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
6.1 (MEDIUM) 7.0 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Aug 04, 2026 - 19:48 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) 2.2.0 microservices that could allow an adjacent network attacker to intercept sensitive communications by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack against HTTPS connections during TLS certificate validation under certain circumstances.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator 2.2.0 contains a vulnerability allowing adjacent network attackers to steal administrative credentials used for infrastructure management. Successful exploitation would grant attackers control over managed systems and a pivot point into your environment. Immediate patching is critical.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
enterprise-only Lenovo data center management platform
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy