Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach deployed app DevTools remote endpoint
-
DeliveryPredict non-crypto PRNG shared secret
-
ExploitAuthenticate restart upload
-
ExecutionPush malicious classes
-
ImpactExecute code as application
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Cryptographic PRNG selection
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that Spring Boot DevTools remote support has been explicitly enabled for a remote application target (Docker container or Cloud Foundry app) via the Spring Tools Boot Dashboard, causing the vulnerable Spring Tools (≤5.2.0) to generate the shared secret with a non-cryptographic PRNG; the attacker must also be able to reach the deployed application's DevTools remote-restart endpoint over the network. Limiting factors: DevTools remote is a development-only feature that is off by default and is officially discouraged in production, exploitation depends on successfully predicting the weak PRNG output (reflected as AC:H), and the vendor scores the vector as adjacent (AV:A) rather than fully remote, so exposure is bounded by how network-reachable the target endpoint is. |
| Impact | The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (8.3 High) reflects an unauthenticated but non-trivial attack (AC:H for predicting the weak secret) whose successful exploitation crosses a security boundary (S:C) to fully compromise the deployed application. No EPSS score, KEV entry, POC, or SSVC decision was provided in the input, so the only quantitative signal is CVSS itself. Real-world risk is materially constrained by the fact that this only matters when DevTools remote support is deliberately enabled against a live target - a configuration Spring explicitly warns should never be used in production - so this is more a targeted/opportunistic developer-supply-chain concern than a mass-exploitation threat. One tension to verify: the vendor chose AV:A (adjacent), yet the described targets (Cloud Foundry apps, Docker containers) are frequently network-reachable, which would argue for AV:N and a slightly higher exposure than the adjacent metric implies - confirm reachability of the DevTools remote endpoint in your environment. Absence of EPSS/KEV/POC data is missing information, not evidence of low risk. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A developer enables DevTools remote support from the Spring Tools Boot Dashboard against a Cloud Foundry app, and Spring Tools generates a predictable shared secret. An attacker who can reach the app's DevTools remote endpoint predicts or brute-forces the weakly-random secret, authenticates a restart upload, and pushes malicious classes that execute as the application, achieving code execution. No public POC is identified at time of analysis, and the attack complexity is high because it hinges on successfully predicting the PRNG output. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 30, 2026
Predictable shared-secret generation in Spring Tools for Eclipse (5.2.0 and earlier) weakens the authentication protecting Spring Boot DevTools remote-restart uploads to remotely deployed targets such as Docker containers or Cloud Foundry apps. Because the secret is derived from a non-cryptographic PRNG rather than a secure random source, an attacker able to reach the deployed application's DevTools remote endpoint may predict the secret, authenticate restart uploads, and push arbitrary code, yielding remote code execution (CVSS 8.3, scope-changed). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Consult the vendor advisory at https://spring.io/security/cve-2026-47882 and upgrade Spring Tools for Eclipse to a release later than 5.2.0 once available; no exact fix version is provided in the available data, so treat this as 'patch available per vendor advisory' and confirm the fixed build number directly from spring.io. As compensating controls until patched: do not enable DevTools remote support from the Boot Dashboard against internet- or shared-network-reachable targets, and never enable spring-boot-devtools remote in production deployments (remove the devtools dependency and any spring.devtools.remote.secret usage from production artifacts). If remote restart is required during development, restrict network access to the DevTools remote endpoint to trusted developer hosts (firewall/security-group allowlist or VPN) so a predictable secret cannot be exploited remotely, and manually set a long, high-entropy spring.devtools.remote.secret rather than relying on the tool-generated value - the trade-off being additional manual key management. Rotate any secrets previously generated by an affected Spring Tools version.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Spring Tools IDE tooling (cpe:2.3:a:spring:spring_tools_for_eclipse) and specifically its Boot Dashboard integration with Spring Boot DevTools 'remote' support. Spring Boot DevTools includes a RemoteSpringApplication client and a server-side endpoint that lets a developer trigger live restarts and file uploads to an application running elsewhere; these uploads are authenticated by a shared secret configured on both ends. Spring Tools automates provisioning that secret when a remote target is enabled from the Boot Dashboard. The root cause (no CWE assigned in the input, but functionally CWE-338 Use of Cryptographically Weak PRNG / CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values) is that this secret was produced with a general-purpose pseudo-random generator (e.g. java.util.Random-style) whose output is statistically predictable and, given enough observed values or knowledge of seeding, can be reconstructed - collapsing the entropy that the upload-authentication mechanism depends on.
Know when Spring gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Deployed DevTools remote endpoint is typically network-reachable (AV:N); predicting the weak PRNG secret is non-trivial (AC:H); no privileges needed (PR:N); compromise crosses to the separate deployed app (S:C) enabling full code execution (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (vmware).
CVSS VectorVendor: vmware
DescriptionCVE.org
When enabling Spring Boot DevTools support for a remote application target (for example a Docker container or Cloud Foundry app) from the Spring Tools Boot Dashboard, Spring Tools generates a shared secret that authenticates DevTools remote-restart uploads to the deployed application. This secret was generated using a non-cryptographic pseudo-random number generator rather than a cryptographically secure source of randomness. Affected Spring Products and Versions: Spring Tools for Eclipse: 5.2.0 and earlier
Articles & Coverage 3
Executive ViewAI
Spring Tools for Eclipse versions 5.2.0 and earlier use weak authentication to protect Spring Boot DevTools remote-restart uploads to production and container environments, allowing attackers who can reach the endpoint to predict authentication secrets, upload malicious code, and gain remote code execution. Organizations running Spring Boot applications with DevTools enabled in Docker containers or Cloud Foundry deployments are at direct risk of compromise. Leadership should prioritize disabling this functionality immediately across deployed environments until a vendor patch becomes available.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) disable DevTools in all production and staging deployments; (2) restrict network access to DevTools endpoints via firewall rules to trusted administrative IPs; (3) monitor application logs for anomalous remote-restart requests; (4) isolate deployed applications from internet-facing networks where possible.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Access control bypass in SpringBlade v4.5.0 importUser function allows low-privileged users to import sensitive user dat
Spring Cloud Config Server contains a path traversal vulnerability when using the native file system backend, allowing u
Spring Framework MVC applications can be vulnerable to a “Path Traversal Vulnerability” when deployed on a non-compliant
SpringBlade v4.5.0 has an access control flaw in authRoutes allowing low-privileged users to escalate to admin through t
Remote code execution in Spring for GraphQL versions 1.3.0-1.3.8, 1.4.0-1.4.5, and 2.0.0-2.0.3 allows unauthenticated at
Server-Sent Events (SSE) stream corruption affects Spring MVC applications built on the functional web framework across
Spring AI versions 1.0.0 through 1.0.4 and 1.1.0 through 1.1.3 allow unauthenticated remote code execution through Sprin
Unsafe JSON deserialization in Spring Framework's JMS message converters (MappingJackson2MessageConverter and JacksonJso
Spring Security Aspects may not correctly locate method security annotations on private methods. Rated critical severity
Safety-guard bypass in the Spring Framework SpEL engine (VMware/Broadcom) lets attacker-controlled expression input esca
Directory traversal in Spring Cloud Config server module allows remote unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files
Spring Security fails to properly write HTTP response headers in servlet applications across multiple versions (5.7.0-5.
EUVD-2026-50973
GHSA-cpfc-g4p9-rg24
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB