Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain on-path MITM position
-
DeliveryIntercept router's server connection
-
ExploitPresent spoofed server with invalid certificate
-
ExecutionDeliver malicious payload past integrity check
-
PersistRouter downloads and executes arbitrary command
-
ImpactFull device compromise and pivot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the attacker to hold a man-in-the-middle position on the network path between the router and the ASUS server it contacts for downloads/updates (this is the AT:P attack requirement in the CVSS 4.0 vector). Given that position, no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are needed. The specific enabling weaknesses are the router's failure to validate the server's TLS certificate and its failure to validate the integrity check value of downloaded content, so a spoofed server can supply arbitrary commands. Limiting factors: exploitation is confined to the affected ASUS router models (specific models/firmware per the ASUS advisory), and the requirement to intercept and spoof the server connection means an attacker with no on-path capability cannot exploit this remotely against an arbitrary Internet-facing device. |
| Impact | Signals are mostly aligned toward high priority but with an important caveat. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N, all impacts High, subsequent-system impacts High) yields 9.5 critical, reflecting unauthenticated network access with full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability and a scope-crossing effect on connected systems. The decisive limiter is AT:P (Attack Requirements: Present) - the attacker must already occupy a man-in-the-middle position, which is non-trivial on the WAN side but realistic on shared or hostile local networks, or via upstream DNS/route hijacking. There is no EPSS score, no POC, and no KEV listing provided, so there is currently no evidence of active or automated exploitation despite the critical rating. This is therefore a genuinely dangerous flaw for exposed or hostile-network deployments, but the MITM precondition makes opportunistic mass exploitation less likely than the raw 9.5 suggests. Note: input CVSS is 4.0 only; no CVSS 3.1 vector was supplied, and affected firmware versions are not enumerated in the provided data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has gained an on-path position - for example on a shared Wi-Fi network, a compromised upstream hop, or via DNS/route hijacking - intercepts the router's connection to an ASUS server. Because the router does not properly validate the server certificate or the integrity of the returned payload, the attacker presents a spoofed server and delivers a malicious command or firmware image, which the router downloads and executes with full privileges. No public POC is reported, and success depends on the attacker first achieving the MITM position (AT:P) rather than on any user interaction. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 15, 2026
Remote command execution in certain ASUS router firmware allows a network man-in-the-middle attacker to force the router to download and run arbitrary commands from a spoofed update/download server. The root cause is a failure to validate both the integrity check value (CWE-354) and the TLS server certificate, so an attacker positioned in the network path can impersonate a legitimate ASUS server. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not in CISA KEV; ASUS self-reported it and rates it critical (CVSS 4.0 9.5), though exploitation requires the attacker to first achieve a MITM position (AT:P).
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fixed firmware listed in the 'Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware' section of the ASUS Security Advisory at https://www.asus.com/security-advisory/ (exact fixed firmware version not specified in the provided data - confirm the build for your specific model on that page). Until firmware can be updated, reduce exposure to man-in-the-middle conditions: avoid administering or updating the router over untrusted networks, ensure the router's update/provisioning traffic egresses only over trusted upstream links, and use trustworthy DNS resolvers to lower the chance of an attacker redirecting the router to a spoofed server (trade-off: does not close the vulnerability, only shrinks the opportunity window). Disable remote/WAN-side management and cloud/auto-update features that reach out to external servers if they are not required (trade-off: loss of remote administration and automatic updates), and segment the router's management plane from untrusted clients.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the firmware/update-retrieval or provisioning routine on ASUS consumer and SMB routers (CPE cpe:2.3:a:asus:router). The vulnerability class is CWE-354, Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value, compounded by improper certificate validation: the router fetches server-supplied content (firmware or command payloads) but does not cryptographically verify the authenticity of the peer or the integrity of the delivered data. Because the TLS certificate chain is not properly validated, an on-path attacker can present a spoofed or self-signed certificate and substitute malicious content, which the router then trusts and executes. This is the classic failure mode of client-side update mechanisms that rely on transport security without pinning or signature verification.
Know when Router gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Network vector but the required MITM position makes AC:H; no auth or interaction (PR:N/UI:N); executing attacker code on the router crosses into managed systems, so S:C with full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (ASUS).
CVSS VectorVendor: ASUS
DescriptionCVE.org
An Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value and Improper Certificate Validation in certain ASUS router models allows a remote man-in-the-middle(MITM) user to make the router download and execute arbitrary command via a spoofed server. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.
Executive ViewAI
A critical vulnerability in certain ASUS router firmware allows attackers positioned in the network path to remotely execute arbitrary commands by intercepting firmware updates, potentially compromising network security and enabling unauthorized device access. No patch is currently available from ASUS. Organizations using ASUS routers must immediately identify and protect these devices, as routers represent a critical chokepoint for network traffic and serve as a direct pathway to internal infrastructure.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: implement network segmentation to prevent MITM positioning, deploy DNS and DHCP monitoring to detect attacks targeting update mechanisms, restrict router outbound connections to whitelisted ASUS update infrastructure only, monitor for suspicious firmware download attempts on affected routers, and consider temporary isolation of high-risk ASUS routers from critical network segments. Conduct ongoing threat hunting for indicators of MITM compromise attempts against router firmware update processes.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Related Vulnerabilities in ASUS Router Models Remote Code and Disclosure Flaws
View all 2Unauthenticated remote attackers can enable Telnet on TOTOLINK X5000R AX1800 routers running firmware V9.1.0u.6369_B2023
Depending on the configuration of the route permission table in file 'saprouttab', it is possible for an unauthenticated
OS command injection in Netcore NAP930 firmware 0.1.241010.141410 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arb
An unauthenticated OS command injection in the CGI handler of Netcore NR289-GE firmware 1.4.5102 lets remote attackers e
Missing authorization in Netcore NBR100V2 firmware 1.3.240614.030928 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to modify d
Authenticated administrators of ASUS routers can execute arbitrary commands on the device by uploading a crafted file th
Unauthenticated network attackers can bypass authentication in the Netcore NR289-GE router's boa_temp web handler and ab
Remote unauthenticated OS command injection in Netcore NR289-GE firmware 1.4.5102 allows attackers to execute arbitrary
Unauthenticated OS command injection in the Netcore NR289-GE router (firmware 1.4.5102) lets any remote attacker who can
A stack-based buffer overflow in the devdiscover service of FAST FAC1900R firmware 20190827_2.0.2 lets unauthenticated r
Unauthenticated OS command injection in the Netcore NBR200V2 router's Web Management Interface (firmware 1.3.241127.0712
Authenticated administrators of certain ASUS router models can abuse leftover debug code in the device's web management
EUVD-2026-44590
GHSA-f3gg-32xv-8j76
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB