Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain physical access to target hardware
  2. Delivery
    Identify active Storage Spaces Direct configuration
  3. Exploit
    Submit malformed storage request to S2D subsystem
  4. Execution
    Trigger integer overflow in size or offset arithmetic
  5. Persist
    Corrupt kernel memory via out-of-bounds write
  6. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code at kernel privilege

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer overflow checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires direct physical access to the target machine - confirmed by CVSS AV:P. No authentication is required (CVSS PR:N), meaning the attacker does not need valid credentials, only physical presence. The vulnerability is specific to Windows systems on which the Storage Spaces Direct feature is active; S2D is not enabled by default on all Windows editions and is most commonly deployed in Windows Server failover cluster or hyperconverged infrastructure configurations. Exploitation is not automatable (SSVC: Automatable: no) and cannot be delivered over a network, serial port, or any remote channel. Limiting factors: mandatory physical proximity to the hardware, Storage Spaces Direct must be configured and running, and the attack cannot be scripted or scaled remotely. These constraints restrict the realistic threat actor pool to insiders, supply-chain personnel, or adversaries who have compromised physical facility access.

Impact

Real-world risk is substantially constrained by the physical attack vector (AV:P), which requires the attacker to be in direct physical contact with the target machine - a significant operational barrier absent from any network-exploitable vulnerability. CVSS 6.8 (Medium) accurately reflects this limitation even though CIA impact is rated fully (C:H/I:H/A:H). SSVC corroborates low urgency: exploitation status 'none,' automatable 'no' - both consistent with a physical vector that cannot be mass-delivered. EPSS at 0.33% (26th percentile) places this well below the median exploitation probability across the CVE population. The SSVC technical impact of 'total' confirms that a successful compromise is catastrophic, but the physical access prerequisite restricts viable attackers to insiders, supply-chain actors, or adversaries who have achieved facility access. This is not a remote or opportunistic threat; it is most relevant to environments with high insider-threat or physical tamper risk, such as data centers, shared colocation facilities, or government installations.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with physical access to a Windows Server running Storage Spaces Direct - for example, a rogue data center technician or an insider - interacts with the storage subsystem to submit a malformed request that triggers the integer overflow, causing a size or offset value to wrap to a small number. The resulting corrupted memory allocation enables out-of-bounds writes into adjacent kernel structures, allowing the attacker to redirect code execution and run arbitrary code with kernel-level privileges on the host. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026

Integer overflow in Windows Storage Spaces Direct enables an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to execute arbitrary code on affected Windows client and server platforms. The CVSS vector (AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms that no credentials are required but direct physical presence at the target hardware is mandatory, substantially narrowing the realistic attacker pool. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; SSVC rates exploitation as 'none' and EPSS stands at 0.33% (26th percentile), consistent with a physical-vector vulnerability not currently observed in opportunistic campaigns.

RemediationAI

Microsoft has released patches for all affected platforms via Windows Update and the Microsoft Security Response Center advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299. Administrators should apply OS updates to reach the following minimum build versions: Windows Server 2025 and Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2269, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5386, Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 21H2 to 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 22H2 to 10.0.19045.7548, and Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23291. Where immediate patching is not feasible, enforcing strict physical access controls to hardware running Storage Spaces Direct is the most effective compensating control; this does not eliminate the software flaw but denies the AV:P attack vector entirely. On systems where S2D is not operationally required, disabling the Storage Spaces Direct feature eliminates the attack surface at the cost of losing software-defined storage capability. Monitoring data center access logs and badge systems for anomalous physical entry events provides detection coverage.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8875
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2525 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23291 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23291, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23291
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9339, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5386 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5386
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_33158 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33158, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 29 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Storage Spaces Direct (S2D) is a Windows software-defined storage feature, available from Windows 10 version 1607 and Windows Server 2012 R2 onward, that pools local disks across cluster nodes into a highly available virtual storage pool. CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound) is the root cause class: an arithmetic operation on a bounded integer type produces a value exceeding the type's representable maximum, wrapping to a small or zero result. In a storage driver context, this typically manifests as an undersized buffer allocation or incorrect bounds calculation, creating conditions for out-of-bounds writes that can corrupt kernel memory structures or code pointers and redirect execution flow. CPE strings confirm the affected scope spans both client platforms (cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:windows_10_version_1607 through windows_11_version_26h1) and server platforms (windows_server_2012_r2 through windows_server_2016), wherever S2D is active.

Know when Windows Server 2016 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CIRCL (temporal) 5.9 MEDIUM
vuln.today AI 6.8 MEDIUM

Physical presence is the sole access barrier (AV:P); no credentials required (PR:N) and no complexity mitigations, yielding full CIA impact constrained only by the physical vector.

3.1 AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Storage Spaces Direct allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code with a physical attack.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Windows Server enterprise feature, not universally enabled by default
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy