Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach DIR-1253 management interface
-
DeliveryInvoke vulnerable /etc/shadow component
-
ExploitRead or overwrite root password hash
-
ExecutionAuthenticate as root
-
ImpactFull device takeover and network pivot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The specific prerequisite is reachability of the DIR-1253 component that mishandles the /etc/shadow credential file on firmware v1.0.1.250923.142435; abuse of that file yields or elevates privileges toward root. The CVSS vector asserts no authentication and network reachability (PR:N/AV:N/UI:N), so if the vulnerable interface is WAN- or LAN-exposed no credentials are needed - however, because the target is a local OS shadow file, exploitation is realistically limited to attackers who can reach the affected management/service endpoint (e.g., on the LAN or via exposed remote management), and units with remote administration disabled are not remotely exploitable. This AV:N-versus-local-file discrepancy is a limiting factor defenders should confirm against the vendor advisory before assuming internet-wide unauthenticated exploitability. |
| Impact | The input CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.8) implies trivial remote unauthenticated compromise, but this conflicts with the description, which points to /etc/shadow - a local OS credential file whose abuse normally presupposes some existing device access or a specific exposed service. This CVSS-vs-description conflict should be resolved with the vendor: if a network-facing endpoint leaks or writes /etc/shadow without authentication the 9.8 holds; otherwise real risk is lower and closer to a local or authenticated escalation. No EPSS score, KEV entry, or SSVC decision data was provided, so probabilistic and automatable-exploitation signals are unknown. The strongest concrete signal is the referenced public PoC (codeberg advisory#recent-poc / zuh.re), which raises practical risk, but PoC availability is not evidence of active exploitation. Net: treat as a high-priority patch target for exposed DIR-1253 units while noting the headline severity may be inflated relative to real-world preconditions. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with access to the router's exposed management interface (or a local/adjacent foothold on the LAN) invokes the vulnerable component to read or overwrite /etc/shadow, obtaining or replacing the root password hash. Using the publicly referenced PoC, they then authenticate as root and take full control of the router, enabling traffic interception, DNS hijacking, or use of the device as a pivot. Because low attack complexity is indicated, the operation needs no special timing or user interaction once the vulnerable interface is reachable. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
Privilege escalation in D-Link DIR-1253 firmware v1.0.1.250923.142435 stems from improper handling of the /etc/shadow file - the store of hashed local credentials - letting an attacker obtain or elevate to root-level access on the device. Publicly available exploit code exists (referenced via the zuh.re/codeberg advisory), but there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited and the CVE is not on the CISA KEV list. The published CVSS of 9.8 (AV:N) appears optimistic given that the core issue centers on a local system credential file, so the true remote-unauthenticated reach should be verified against the vendor advisory.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified at time of analysis, so monitor the D-Link security bulletin page (https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin/) and apply fixed DIR-1253 firmware as soon as D-Link publishes it. Until a patched build is confirmed, reduce exposure with concrete compensating controls: disable remote/WAN management on the router (trade-off: administrators lose off-LAN configuration access), restrict administrative access to a trusted management VLAN or specific LAN hosts, block inbound access to the router's HTTP/HTTPS/Telnet/SSH management ports from the internet at the perimeter, and change all device credentials to strong unique values (trade-off: does not fix the underlying file-permission flaw but limits reuse if hashes are exposed). Review the referenced PoC/advisory (https://zuh.re/cve/2026-52533/ and https://codeberg.org/zuhri/advisory#recent-poc) to identify the exact triggering interface so the corresponding service can be firewalled off.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The DIR-1253 is a D-Link consumer/SOHO Wi-Fi router running embedded Linux-based firmware. On such systems /etc/shadow holds the salted password hashes for local accounts including root and is meant to be readable and writable only by root. The flaw is classified as CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), meaning the firmware either exposes, mis-permissions, or otherwise fails to protect this credential store, allowing a lower-privileged context to read hashes (enabling offline cracking) or write/replace them (directly gaining root). The MITRE-supplied CPE is a placeholder (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) providing no usable product identification, so affected-product scope rests entirely on the description text.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Abuse of a local /etc/shadow file realistically needs a device/adjacent foothold (AV:A) and some existing access (PR:L) to escalate; root then gives full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
An issue in D-Link DIR-1253 v.1.0.1.250923.142435 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the etc/shadow component file
Executive ViewAI
The D-Link DIR-1253 router (v1.0.1.250923.142435) contains a critical privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) with publicly available exploit code, enabling unauthenticated attackers to gain root-level access. Compromised routers become network infrastructure attack vectors-allowing threat actors to intercept traffic, modify configurations, and move laterally into internal networks-affecting all organizations using this device model.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement immediate mitigations: restrict device management access to internal-only networks (disable WAN administrative access), place the device on an isolated management VLAN with egress firewall rules, disable UPnP and other remote services, monitor access logs for unauthorized configuration attempts, and apply network segmentation to limit breach blast radius. Recommend expedited replacement of this model.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2026-43609
GHSA-fqgf-jr4j-gw4g
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB