Skip to main content

Discourse EUVDEUVD-2026-42730

| CVE-2026-49256 MEDIUM
Information Exposure (CWE-200)
2026-07-09 security-advisories@github.com
6.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: github
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify public Discourse instance
  2. Delivery
    Query /categories.json or group endpoint unauthenticated
  3. Exploit
    Parse JSON response for tag and tag-group fields
  4. Execution
    Extract restricted tag and tag-group names
  5. Impact
    Record organizational metadata for reconnaissance

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target Discourse instance has at least one restricted tag or restricted tag group assigned as allowed_tags, allowed_tag_groups, or a required tag group on a publicly readable category. Both conditions must be true simultaneously: the tag/tag-group must be marked restricted (hidden from non-privileged users), and the category it is attached to must be readable without authentication. This is a non-default configuration - a fresh Discourse installation with no custom tag restrictions is not affected, as confirmed by the CVSS 4.0 AT:P (Attack Requirements: Specific) modifier. Limiting factors: exploitation yields only tag and tag-group name strings - no post content, user data, private messages, or credentials are exposed; no write access or code execution is possible; impact is bounded entirely to confidentiality of taxonomy metadata.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3 (Medium) accurately reflects the limited blast radius: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N indicate the endpoint is trivially reachable by any unauthenticated actor, but AT:P confirms that exploitation is gated on a specific administrator-configured precondition (restricted tags attached to public categories). The impact metrics VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N confirm this is a pure read-only confidentiality issue with no integrity, availability, or cross-system scope. No EPSS data was provided, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, indicating no observed active exploitation. The practical risk is low to medium and heavily deployment-dependent: forums using restricted tags solely for internal workflow governance may expose organizational metadata, while deployments using tags only for benign public categorization face negligible real-world exposure. This is not a code execution, authentication bypass, or data exfiltration risk - it is a metadata enumeration flaw.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker sends a standard HTTP GET request to a public Discourse forum's /categories.json or equivalent group endpoint. The JSON response includes the names of restricted tags and tag groups attached to publicly readable categories, which the attacker records for organizational intelligence gathering or targeted social engineering. No exploit code or special tooling is required - curl or a browser suffices, provided the AT:P precondition (restricted tags configured on public categories) exists in the target deployment.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 09, 2026

Restricted tag and tag-group name disclosure in Discourse exposes internal taxonomy metadata to anonymous and unauthorized users via the category and group API endpoints. All Discourse versions prior to 2026.6.0, 2026.5.1, 2026.4.2, and 2026.1.5 are affected when restricted tags or tag groups are configured on publicly readable categories. An unauthenticated actor can enumerate these names - which may contain sensitive organizational labels, project codenames, or internal classifications - using standard HTTP requests with no exploit tooling required. No public exploit code exists and this is not listed in CISA KEV; the CVSS 4.0 AT:P modifier confirms that exploitation requires a specific non-default configuration to be present.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Discourse to one of the patched releases: v2026.6.0, v2026.5.1, v2026.4.2, or v2026.1.5, as documented in the GitHub Security Advisory at https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-mwp7-572g-6qpx. As a compensating control prior to patching, administrators should audit all publicly readable categories and temporarily remove restricted tags or tag groups from their allowed_tags, allowed_tag_groups, and required tag group configurations; note that this will affect authorized users' ability to apply those tags until the patch is applied. Alternatively, convert affected restricted tags to unrestricted if their names contain no sensitive information, eliminating the exposure without disrupting tagging workflows. Network-layer controls (restricting API access to authenticated sessions via reverse proxy rules) would fully mitigate the leak but may break public-facing Discourse functionality and are not recommended as a long-term solution.

Affected VersionsENISA

discourse 2026.4.0-latest, < 2026.4.2
discourse 2026.5.0-latest, < 2026.5.1
discourse 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.5

Affected Packages

euvd discourse_2026_1_0_latest fix: 2026.1.5
euvd discourse_2026_4_0_latest fix: 2026.4.2
euvd discourse_2026_5_0_latest fix: 2026.5.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Discourse is a widely deployed open-source community forum platform. Its tagging subsystem allows administrators to define allowed_tags, allowed_tag_groups, and required tag groups on a per-category basis, and to designate individual tag and tag-group names as restricted - hiding them from users who lack the appropriate permission level. The root cause is CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor): the category and group API endpoints failed to enforce tag-name visibility restrictions when assembling responses, returning restricted names in plaintext JSON to any requesting party, including anonymous users. The affected endpoints are network-accessible and require no authentication. No CPE strings were provided in the input, but the vulnerability is in the core Discourse application across multiple active release branches (stable 2026.1.x, 2026.4.x, 2026.5.x, and 2026.6.x).

Know when Discourse gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (github) PRIMARY 6.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 3.7 LOW

AC:H maps the CVSS 4.0 AT:P precondition; PR:N because no auth needed once conditions exist; C:L for tag-name-only disclosure with no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (github).

CVSS VectorVendor: github

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Jul 09, 2026 - 23:02 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to 2026.6.0, 2026.5.1, 2026.4.2, and 2026.1.5, restricted tag and tag-group names attached to publicly readable categories as allowed_tags, allowed_tag_groups, or required tag groups could leak to anonymous and unauthorized users through category and group endpoints. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.6.0, 2026.5.1, 2026.4.2, and 2026.1.5.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 70% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source forum platform with broad community and enterprise deployments
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-48954 HIGH POC
8.1 Jun 25

Discourse versions prior to 3.5.0.beta6 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in social login fun

CVE-2022-46162 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 30

discourse-bbcode is the official BBCode plugin for Discourse. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is

CVE-2026-27934 HIGH POC
8.7 Mar 19

Unauthorized information disclosure in Discourse discussion platform versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and

CVE-2024-47773 HIGH POC
8.2 Oct 08

Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.2), this vulnerability is rem

CVE-2026-26265 HIGH POC
7.5 Feb 26

Discourse versions prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 contain an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the

CVE-2021-3138 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 14

In Discourse 2.7.0 through beta1, a rate-limit bypass leads to a bypass of the 2FA requirement for certain forms. Rated

CVE-2026-26077 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Feb 26

Unauthenticated attackers can submit forged webhook payloads to multiple email provider integrations in Discourse versio

CVE-2023-38706 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Sep 15

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploi

CVE-2024-53991 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Dec 19

Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.9), this vulnerability is r

CVE-2025-48877 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 09

Discourse versions prior to 3.4.4 (stable), 3.5.0.beta5 (beta), and 3.5.0.beta6-dev (tests-passed) contain a critical vu

CVE-2023-47121 CRITICAL
9.8 Nov 10

Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is

CVE-2022-39355 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 26

Discourse Patreon enables syncronization between Discourse Groups and Patreon rewards. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy