Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege flow-author account
-
DeliveryCreate flow with API Request component
-
ExploitEnable follow_redirects, set public redirector URL
-
ExecutionServer follows redirect to internal/metadata address
-
PersistRetrieve internal response (credentials/tokens)
-
ImpactUse leaked secrets for further access
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated account with the flow-author role (CVSS PR:L) and that the attacker enable the follow_redirects parameter on the API Request component - that toggle being on is the specific feature condition that triggers the bypass. The attacker must also control (or be able to reach) an intermediate public URL that issues an HTTP 3xx redirect to the intended internal/localhost/metadata target. Limiting factors: it is NOT unauthenticated (an account is mandatory), it only matters when Langflow's SSRF protection is otherwise enabled, and value is highest in cloud or multi-tenant deployments where reachable internal targets (metadata endpoints, admin panels) exist; in an isolated instance with no internal services reachable from the host, impact is reduced. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N, base 8.5) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low-complexity, requires only low-privilege authenticated access (the flow-author role), no user interaction, with a scope change reflecting that the SSRF reaches systems beyond the Langflow process and high confidentiality impact from leaked credentials/metadata. The principal limiting factor is authentication - an attacker must already hold a flow-author account, which downgrades this from a fully unauthenticated internet-facing SSRF to a privileged-insider or post-account-compromise vector; this is meaningful in multi-tenant or shared Langflow deployments. No EPSS score, KEV listing, SSVC decision, or POC was provided in the input, so exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from data - the score is a severity ceiling, not evidence of active exploitation. The follow_redirects requirement is a concrete, attacker-controllable toggle rather than a rare server-side configuration, so the technical barrier is low once an account is held. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds (or phishes/compromises) a low-privilege flow-author account in a shared Langflow instance builds a flow with an API Request node, enables follow_redirects, and sets the URL to an attacker-controlled public server that 302-redirects to http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/. Langflow validates only the benign public URL, follows the redirect server-side, and returns the cloud IAM credentials to the attacker. Given AV:N/AC:L the request requires no special timing or tooling beyond a normal browser session against the Langflow UI/API. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 30, 2026
Server-Side Request Forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an authenticated flow-author bypass the API Request component's SSRF protections by toggling the follow_redirects parameter and pointing it at a benign public URL that redirects to internal or localhost targets. Because only the initial URL is validated and redirect destinations are not re-checked, attackers can pivot to cloud metadata services, localhost endpoints, and private-network HTTP services to exfiltrate credentials, tokens, and admin-panel data. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; risk is driven by the CVSS 8.5 rating and the high value of cloud-metadata SSRF targets rather than confirmed in-the-wild use.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to the IBM-fixed Langflow OSS release noted in the vendor advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7277561 (a fixed version above 1.9.3 is expected but the exact patched build is not stated in the available data - confirm directly with the advisory before deploying). Until patched, set or enforce follow_redirects=false on API Request components so redirect chains are not followed, which removes the bypass at the cost of breaking flows that legitimately depend on redirects; additionally, restrict the flow-author role to trusted users, place egress filtering in front of Langflow to block outbound access to 169.254.169.254, 127.0.0.0/8, and RFC1918 ranges, and where supported enforce IMDSv2 / disable IMDSv1 on cloud hosts so metadata SSRF cannot trivially mint credentials. The egress and metadata controls have minimal side effects; disabling follow_redirects may break legitimate redirect-dependent integrations.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Langflow is an open-source, low-code visual framework for building LLM-driven agents and workflows; its API Request component is a built-in node that lets a flow author issue outbound HTTP calls. The flaw is a classic CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) implemented as a TOCTOU-style validation gap: the SSRF allow/deny check is applied to the user-supplied URL but is not re-applied to the Location header returned on a 3xx redirect. When follow_redirects is enabled, the HTTP client transparently follows the attacker-controlled redirect to an address (e.g., 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata, 127.0.0.1, or RFC1918 ranges) that the original validation would have rejected, so the server itself makes the disallowed request and returns the response to the attacker.
Know when Langflow gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Authenticated flow-author (PR:L) over the network with low complexity; SSRF reaches other systems (S:C) and discloses sensitive data (C:H), limited integrity from forced requests (I:L), no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (us).
CVSS VectorVendor: us
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0-1.9.3 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability (CVSS 8.5) that enables authenticated users to bypass security controls and access internal systems, cloud credentials, and private network endpoints, creating immediate risk of credential theft and data exfiltration. Organizations running affected versions lack vendor-provided remediation and must implement urgent interim controls to prevent compromise of cloud credentials and administrative systems.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Network segmentation-enforce firewall rules blocking Langflow servers from reaching private IP ranges and 169.254.169.254; (2) Deploy WAF or API gateway rules to filter HTTP 30x status redirects targeting internal or localhost destinations; (3) Restrict flow-author role assignment and conduct access review; (4) Disable API Request component if not operationally required; (5) Enable egress logging and alerting on redirect chains attempting to reach metadata services, localhost (127.0.0.1), or internal IP ranges.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Langflow before 1.3.0 allows unauthenticated remote code injection through the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint, enabling
Langflow has a third RCE vulnerability via exec_globals (EPSS 10.0%) allowing inclusion of untrusted code that executes
Account takeover and remote code execution in Langflow AI workflow platform versions ≤1.6.9 due to a CORS misconfigurati
Langflow has a code injection vulnerability in the code component (EPSS 2.6%) enabling remote code execution through the
Langflow has an eval injection in eval_custom_component_code (EPSS 2.0%) enabling remote code execution through crafted
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary
Code injection in Langflow CSV Agent node before 1.8.0. The node hardcodes allow_dangerous_code=True, enabling arbitrary
Langflow through 0.6.19 allows remote code execution if untrusted users are able to reach the "POST /api/v1/custom_compo
OS command injection in Langflow's MCP stdio transport allows an attacker who can reach the MCP server configuration end
langflow <=1.0.18 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) as any component provided the code functionality and the
langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component.
Langflow before 1.7.0.dev45 exposes multiple API endpoints without authentication, allowing unauthenticated access to us
EUVD-2026-40405
GHSA-33xg-qw74-fhr3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB