Skip to main content

IBM Langflow CVE-2026-10129

| EUVDEUVD-2026-40405 HIGH
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-06-30 psirt@us.ibm.com GHSA-33xg-qw74-fhr3
8.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: us
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege flow-author account
  2. Delivery
    Create flow with API Request component
  3. Exploit
    Enable follow_redirects, set public redirector URL
  4. Execution
    Server follows redirect to internal/metadata address
  5. Persist
    Retrieve internal response (credentials/tokens)
  6. Impact
    Use leaked secrets for further access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated account with the flow-author role (CVSS PR:L) and that the attacker enable the follow_redirects parameter on the API Request component - that toggle being on is the specific feature condition that triggers the bypass. The attacker must also control (or be able to reach) an intermediate public URL that issues an HTTP 3xx redirect to the intended internal/localhost/metadata target. Limiting factors: it is NOT unauthenticated (an account is mandatory), it only matters when Langflow's SSRF protection is otherwise enabled, and value is highest in cloud or multi-tenant deployments where reachable internal targets (metadata endpoints, admin panels) exist; in an isolated instance with no internal services reachable from the host, impact is reduced.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N, base 8.5) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low-complexity, requires only low-privilege authenticated access (the flow-author role), no user interaction, with a scope change reflecting that the SSRF reaches systems beyond the Langflow process and high confidentiality impact from leaked credentials/metadata. The principal limiting factor is authentication - an attacker must already hold a flow-author account, which downgrades this from a fully unauthenticated internet-facing SSRF to a privileged-insider or post-account-compromise vector; this is meaningful in multi-tenant or shared Langflow deployments. No EPSS score, KEV listing, SSVC decision, or POC was provided in the input, so exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from data - the score is a severity ceiling, not evidence of active exploitation. The follow_redirects requirement is a concrete, attacker-controllable toggle rather than a rare server-side configuration, so the technical barrier is low once an account is held.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds (or phishes/compromises) a low-privilege flow-author account in a shared Langflow instance builds a flow with an API Request node, enables follow_redirects, and sets the URL to an attacker-controlled public server that 302-redirects to http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/. Langflow validates only the benign public URL, follows the redirect server-side, and returns the cloud IAM credentials to the attacker. Given AV:N/AC:L the request requires no special timing or tooling beyond a normal browser session against the Langflow UI/API.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 30, 2026

Server-Side Request Forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an authenticated flow-author bypass the API Request component's SSRF protections by toggling the follow_redirects parameter and pointing it at a benign public URL that redirects to internal or localhost targets. Because only the initial URL is validated and redirect destinations are not re-checked, attackers can pivot to cloud metadata services, localhost endpoints, and private-network HTTP services to exfiltrate credentials, tokens, and admin-panel data. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; risk is driven by the CVSS 8.5 rating and the high value of cloud-metadata SSRF targets rather than confirmed in-the-wild use.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to the IBM-fixed Langflow OSS release noted in the vendor advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7277561 (a fixed version above 1.9.3 is expected but the exact patched build is not stated in the available data - confirm directly with the advisory before deploying). Until patched, set or enforce follow_redirects=false on API Request components so redirect chains are not followed, which removes the bypass at the cost of breaking flows that legitimately depend on redirects; additionally, restrict the flow-author role to trusted users, place egress filtering in front of Langflow to block outbound access to 169.254.169.254, 127.0.0.0/8, and RFC1918 ranges, and where supported enforce IMDSv2 / disable IMDSv1 on cloud hosts so metadata SSRF cannot trivially mint credentials. The egress and metadata controls have minimal side effects; disabling follow_redirects may break legitimate redirect-dependent integrations.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.9.3

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Langflow is an open-source, low-code visual framework for building LLM-driven agents and workflows; its API Request component is a built-in node that lets a flow author issue outbound HTTP calls. The flaw is a classic CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) implemented as a TOCTOU-style validation gap: the SSRF allow/deny check is applied to the user-supplied URL but is not re-applied to the Location header returned on a 3xx redirect. When follow_redirects is enabled, the HTTP client transparently follows the attacker-controlled redirect to an address (e.g., 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata, 127.0.0.1, or RFC1918 ranges) that the original validation would have rejected, so the server itself makes the disallowed request and returns the response to the attacker.

Know when Langflow gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (us) PRIMARY 8.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.5 HIGH

Authenticated flow-author (PR:L) over the network with low complexity; SSRF reaches other systems (S:C) and discloses sensitive data (C:H), limited integrity from forced requests (I:L), no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (us).

CVSS VectorVendor: us

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0-1.9.3 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability (CVSS 8.5) that enables authenticated users to bypass security controls and access internal systems, cloud credentials, and private network endpoints, creating immediate risk of credential theft and data exfiltration. Organizations running affected versions lack vendor-provided remediation and must implement urgent interim controls to prevent compromise of cloud credentials and administrative systems.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Network segmentation-enforce firewall rules blocking Langflow servers from reaching private IP ranges and 169.254.169.254; (2) Deploy WAF or API gateway rules to filter HTTP 30x status redirects targeting internal or localhost destinations; (3) Restrict flow-author role assignment and conduct access review; (4) Disable API Request component if not operationally required; (5) Enable egress logging and alerting on redirect chains attempting to reach metadata services, localhost (127.0.0.1), or internal IP ranges.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source LLM app builder, common in dev/cloud but not ubiquitous enterprise
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2025-3248 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Langflow before 1.3.0 allows unauthenticated remote code injection through the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint, enabling

CVE-2026-0770 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 23

Langflow has a third RCE vulnerability via exec_globals (EPSS 10.0%) allowing inclusion of untrusted code that executes

CVE-2025-34291 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 05

Account takeover and remote code execution in Langflow AI workflow platform versions ≤1.6.9 due to a CORS misconfigurati

CVE-2026-0768 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 23

Langflow has a code injection vulnerability in the code component (EPSS 2.6%) enabling remote code execution through the

CVE-2026-0769 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 23

Langflow has an eval injection in eval_custom_component_code (EPSS 2.0%) enabling remote code execution through crafted

CVE-2026-10134 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 30

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary

CVE-2026-27966 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 26

Code injection in Langflow CSV Agent node before 1.8.0. The node hardcodes allow_dangerous_code=True, enabling arbitrary

CVE-2024-37014 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 10

Langflow through 0.6.19 allows remote code execution if untrusted users are able to reach the "POST /api/v1/custom_compo

CVE-2026-105697 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Oct 05

OS command injection in Langflow's MCP stdio transport allows an attacker who can reach the MCP server configuration end

CVE-2024-48061 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 04

langflow <=1.0.18 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) as any component provided the code functionality and the

CVE-2024-42835 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 31

langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component.

CVE-2026-21445 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Jan 02

Langflow before 1.7.0.dev45 exposes multiple API endpoints without authentication, allowing unauthenticated access to us

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy