Skip to main content

Edimax BR-6478AC EUVDEUVD-2026-38194

| CVE-2026-12808 LOW
Command Injection (CWE-77)
2026-06-21 VulDB GHSA-jjp3-xfgf-mr9p
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain router web interface credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted POST request to /goform/stainfo
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters in `interface` parameter
  4. Execution
    Bypass absent input sanitization in stainfo handler
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary OS commands with router process privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires low-privilege authenticated access (PR:L per the provided CVSS 4.0 vector) to the Edimax BR-6478AC V2 web management interface - specifically, the ability to submit POST requests to the /goform/stainfo endpoint with attacker-controlled values in the interface parameter. No special non-default configuration is required beyond possessing valid credentials. Exploitation is limited by this authentication requirement; however, the practical barrier is substantially reduced on SOHO routers where default credentials (admin/admin or similar) remain common. Remote network exploitation is possible if the router's management interface is exposed on the WAN interface, which is non-default on most SOHO routers but occurs due to misconfiguration; LAN-side exploitation is the more common path. No specific OS, browser, or feature toggle condition is documented as a prerequisite beyond authentication.

Impact

The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N with VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) yields a score of 2.1 - a figure that conflicts sharply with the typical real-world impact of command injection on embedded Linux firmware, where full root shell access is the expected outcome. This discrepancy is unexplained in the available data and may reflect a reporter-applied conservative impact estimate; security teams should treat the 2.1 score with skepticism and independently assess impact. There is no CISA KEV listing, so confirmed widespread active exploitation is not established, and no EPSS data was provided. However, the existence of a public POC exploit (E:P in the CVSS 4.0 supplemental data) significantly raises real-world risk, and the PR:L authentication requirement - while a meaningful barrier in principle - is effectively reduced on SOHO devices that commonly retain default or weak credentials. The complete absence of a vendor patch, with no vendor response to disclosure, means all deployed BR-6478AC V2 units running firmware 1.23 remain permanently unmitigated without third-party action.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained low-privilege authenticated access to the BR-6478AC V2 web management interface - either through default credentials, credential stuffing, or prior lateral movement - sends a crafted POST request to /goform/stainfo with a payload such as interface=eth0;id; or a reverse-shell command embedded via shell metacharacters in the interface parameter. The stainfo CGI handler passes the unsanitized value directly to a system call, executing arbitrary OS commands with the privileges of the web process (typically root on embedded Linux). A public proof-of-concept documenting the exact exploitation method is available at the Notion page referenced in VulDB entry 372602, further lowering the skill barrier for exploitation.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 1.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 22, 2026

Command injection in the Edimax BR-6478AC V2 router (firmware 1.23) allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by manipulating the interface argument in POST requests to /goform/stainfo. No patch is available - Edimax did not respond to coordinated disclosure - and a public proof-of-concept exploit exists, making this a persistent, unmitigated risk on deployed devices. The vendor-reported CVSS 4.0 score of 2.1 appears to significantly understate actual impact, as unrestricted command injection on embedded router firmware typically enables full system control rather than merely low-severity limited access.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - Edimax did not respond to coordinated disclosure and no fixed firmware version is known. As an immediate compensating control, disable remote (WAN-side) management access to the router's web interface if it is exposed externally, reducing the attack surface to LAN-only access; note this does not eliminate the vulnerability but removes the most accessible attack vector. Enforce strong, unique administrator credentials on the device to raise the effective exploitation barrier beyond the PR:L threshold; default credentials make the PR:L requirement trivially satisfied. Apply network segmentation to isolate the router management VLAN from general user networks. If asset criticality justifies it, replacing the device with a vendor-supported model that has an active security response program is the recommended permanent resolution, as no patch timeline exists. Reference: VulDB advisory https://vuldb.com/vuln/372602; NVD entry https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12808.

Affected VersionsENISA

BR-6478AC V2 1.23

Affected Packages

euvd br_6478ac_v2 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the stainfo function within the /goform/stainfo POST request handler of the Edimax BR-6478AC V2 (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:edimax:br-6478ac_v2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), a SOHO dual-band wireless router. The goform endpoint pattern is characteristic of embedded CGI-style web management interfaces common in Realtek- and MediaTek-based router firmware, where POST parameters are frequently passed directly to shell utilities for network diagnostics. The root cause is CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command), meaning the interface POST parameter is concatenated into a system-level shell command without adequate sanitization or metacharacter escaping. This class of flaw is endemic in SOHO router firmware and, when reached, typically provides direct shell access to the underlying Linux-based OS running as root.

Know when Br 6478Ac V2 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-accessible command injection requiring only low-privilege router credentials realistically yields full root shell access, warranting C:H/I:H/A:H rather than the reporter's Low ratings.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Jun 21, 2026 - 21:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Jun 21, 2026 - 21:22 NVD
5.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was determined in Edimax BR-6478AC V2 1.23. This impacts the function stainfo of the file /goform/stainfo of the component POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument interface causes command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.2%
Top 36% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 1.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

31
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy