Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure user to malicious RDP endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Victim initiates RDP connection outbound
  3. Exploit
    Server sends crafted PDU
  4. Execution
    Heap overflow in client parser
  5. Persist
    Win heap-groom race condition
  6. Impact
    Execute code as logged-on user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to initiate or accept an RDP connection from the vulnerable Remote Desktop Client to an attacker-controlled RDP server (UI:R), giving the malicious server the opportunity to send the crafted PDU that triggers the heap overflow; no credentials on the client side are needed (PR:N). Exploitation is limited by AC:H, meaning the attacker must satisfy an additional condition beyond simply serving a malformed packet - likely winning a race or successfully grooming the client heap - and by the requirement that the user be willing to connect outbound to an untrusted RDP endpoint, which is uncommon in hardened enterprise environments that restrict outbound 3389/443-RDP traffic. The flaw cannot be triggered server-to-client without that outbound connection, so listening RDP servers (the usual RDP attack surface) are not the vulnerable component here.

Impact

The CVSS 7.5 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates a network-reachable, unauthenticated bug with high impact but elevated attack complexity and required user interaction - meaning a victim must initiate or accept an RDP session to a malicious server, and the attacker must satisfy some non-trivial condition (likely a heap-grooming or race window) to achieve reliable exploitation. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the CVE is not on CISA KEV, and no EPSS score was supplied in the input, so quantitative exploitation probability cannot be cited. Real-world risk is highest for environments where users routinely connect outbound to third-party RDP gateways, jump hosts, or hosted desktops; in tightly-scoped internal-only RDP deployments the realistic exposure is significantly lower than the raw CVSS suggests.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server and lures a target - via phishing with a crafted .rdp file, a typo-squatted hosted-desktop link, or a compromised RD Gateway - into initiating a connection. During session negotiation the server returns a malformed PDU that overflows a heap buffer in the client parser, leading to code execution in the user's context on the victim workstation. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, but the AC:H rating implies a working exploit would require heap shaping rather than being impossible.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Remote code execution in Microsoft Remote Desktop Client is possible when a user is enticed to connect to an attacker-controlled RDP server, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122). The flaw scores CVSS 7.5 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) and, while no public exploit is identified at time of analysis, the network-reachable nature and full CIA impact make it a meaningful client-side risk for users connecting to untrusted endpoints.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the Microsoft security update for Remote Desktop Client listed in the MSRC entry at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992, selecting the KB that matches each affected Windows or Remote Desktop app build. Until patches are deployed, restrict outbound TCP/UDP 3389 (and 443 for RD Gateway tunneled sessions) at the perimeter so endpoints cannot reach untrusted RDP servers, and instruct users not to connect to .rdp files or mstsc links from email or web sources; the trade-off is that legitimate connections to third-party hosted desktops will break and must be allowlisted. Where outbound RDP must remain open, force connections through a Remote Desktop Gateway and disable risky virtual channels (clipboard, drive, device redirection) via Group Policy to reduce the attack surface exposed to a hostile server, accepting the usability loss those redirections provide.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7219
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8655
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5256
Windows App Client for Windows Desktop 1.00 <2.0.1193.0
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7417
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8655
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7417
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9234, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.8880, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417
microsoft windows_11_version_23h2_10_0_22631_7219 fix: Windows 11 Version 23H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219, Windows 11 Version 23H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269, Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_app_client_for_windows_desktop_2_0_1193_0 fix: Windows App Client for Windows Desktop 2.0.1193.0
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9234, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.8880, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5256 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5256, Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation) 10.0.20348.5256
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_32995 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.32995, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7417
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7417
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7219
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8655
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8655
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_app_client_for_windows_desktop fix: 2.0.1193.0
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5256
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.32995

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 29 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client implements the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) over TCP/UDP 3389, parsing a complex stream of virtual-channel, graphics, clipboard, and device-redirection PDUs from the server. CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) indicates that one of these parsers writes attacker-controlled data past the bounds of a heap allocation - typically due to an incorrect length calculation or missing bounds check on a server-supplied field. Because the corruption occurs in the client process, a malicious RDP server (rather than a malicious client) is the threat actor, inverting the usual RDP trust model.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CIRCL (temporal) 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVE Published
Jun 22, 2026 - 06:03 cve.org
HIGH 7.5
Patch available
Jun 09, 2026 - 19:03 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 78% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy