Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconObtain low-privilege SINEC INS credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to management API
-
ExploitPOST crafted directory name to /api/sftp/uploadFiles
-
InstallMalicious payload stored on appliance
-
C2Admin or job lists SFTP directory
-
ExecuteShell command executes as sinecins user
-
ImpactEstablish persistence on SINEC appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires (1) network reachability to the SINEC INS web/API interface, (2) valid credentials for an account with permission to call the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint (CVSS PR:L confirms authenticated, low-privilege access is sufficient - administrative rights are not required), and (3) a subsequent directory-listing action by any user or process to trigger the stored payload. Limiting factors: SINEC INS is typically deployed inside segmented industrial/OT management networks rather than internet-exposed, so the attacker must already have a foothold in or credentials to that segment; exploitation is also gated on the second-order trigger, meaning if directory listings are never performed the payload remains dormant. No user interaction is required from the victim beyond the routine act of listing directory contents (CVSS UI:N). |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H indicates a low-complexity network-reachable attack requiring only low-privilege authenticated access and no user interaction, yielding full compromise of the affected service account - a credible priority for any Siemens OT environment exposing SINEC INS management interfaces. EPSS and KEV data were not provided in the input, so widespread exploitation cannot be confirmed; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The realistic risk is moderate-to-high: SINEC INS is typically deployed in segmented OT/industrial networks where low-privilege accounts may still be broadly issued, and the stored nature of the injection means a low-privilege user can compromise the host the moment a higher-privilege user or scheduled job lists the directory. Scope remains unchanged (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), so impact is confined to the sinecins service user rather than crossing a privilege boundary at the OS root level. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privilege operator account (or attacker who has phished/credential-stuffed such an account) authenticates to SINEC INS and POSTs to /api/sftp/uploadFiles specifying a directory name containing a shell metacharacter payload such as |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026
Authenticated command injection in Siemens SINEC INS versions prior to V1.0 SP2 Update 6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as the sinecins service account by submitting crafted directory names to the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint. The injected payloads are stored and triggered later when directory listings are retrieved, producing a stored/second-order command injection. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the underlying host.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: SINEC INS V1.0 SP2 Update 6 - upgrade all instances to this version or later per Siemens ProductCERT SSA-860189 (https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-860189.html). Until the upgrade can be deployed, restrict network access to the SINEC INS management interface to a dedicated administration VLAN or jump host so that only trusted operators can reach /api/sftp/uploadFiles, and tighten role assignments so that low-privilege accounts with SFTP upload rights are minimized - the trade-off is operational friction for legitimate SFTP users and reduced self-service for field engineers. Additionally, audit existing SFTP directory names on deployed instances for suspicious shell metacharacters (backticks, $(), semicolons, pipes) before the patch runs and triggers any pre-planted payload, since this is a stored injection where malicious directory names may already be present.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
SINEC INS (Infrastructure Network Services) is Siemens' centralized management appliance providing services such as RADIUS, syslog, DHCP, SFTP, and certificate handling for industrial network infrastructure (CPE cpe:2.3:a:siemens:sinec_ins:*). The flaw is a classic CWE-78 OS Command Injection: the SFTP upload handler accepts a directory name parameter that is later interpolated into a shell command (most plausibly an ls/find/stat call during directory enumeration) without proper sanitization or use of parameterized execution. Because the payload is persisted and only executed when an admin or process subsequently lists directories, this is effectively stored command injection - a more dangerous variant than reflected injection because the trigger is decoupled from the initial request.
Know when Sinec Ins gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Primary rating from Vendor (siemens) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: siemens
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The application does not properly sanitize user input in the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint, allowing the injection of shell command payloads via crafted directory names. These payloads are stored and executed when directory listings are retrieved. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the affected service user (sinecins).
Executive ViewAI
Siemens SINEC INS versions prior to V1.0 SP2 Update 6 contain an authenticated command injection vulnerability enabling credential-holding attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands with service account privileges, directly threatening the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected infrastructure. Organizations operating SINEC INS face elevated risk of host compromise and potential lateral movement within industrial control or network environments. The absence of a vendor patch requires immediate defensive action to contain exposure until remediation becomes available.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Restrict network access to the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint via firewall or API gateway controls. Enforce credential governance and rotate credentials for accounts accessing SINEC INS. Implement input validation to reject directory submission containing shell metacharacters (|, &, ;, `, $, etc.). Deploy host-based monitoring to detect anomalous process execution from the sinecins service account. Enable comprehensive audit logging of API calls and file operations for threat detection and forensic investigation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Related Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS Command Injection and Path Traversal
View all 2In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehas
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. Rated high severity (CVS
When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer
A weak randomness in WebCrypto keygen vulnerability exists in Node.js 18 due to a change with EntropySource() in SecretK
json-c through 0.14 has an integer overflow and out-of-bounds write via a large JSON file, as demonstrated by printbuf_m
axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is
The package ua-parser-js before 0.7.23 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in multiple regexe
In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x
Local privilege escalation in Siemens SINEC INS (versions prior to V1.0 SP2 Update 6) stems from a binary shipped with t
The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v18.7.0 does not correctly handle header fields that are not terminated wit
The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly handle multi-line T
The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly parse and validate
EUVD-2026-35383
GHSA-vxxj-9x7w-4356
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB