Skip to main content

Totolink CA750-PoE EUVDEUVD-2026-31771

| CVE-2026-9515 LOW
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-05-25 VulDB GHSA-chj8-3r5w-6fwr
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege device credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted HTTP request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi
  3. Exploit
    Inject OS commands via plugin_version parameter
  4. Execution
    setUnloadUserData passes unsanitized input to shell
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands on firmware

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a low-privilege authenticated session on the Totolink CA750-PoE web management interface - confirmed by CVSS PR:L. The attacker must be able to send HTTP requests to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, meaning the management interface must be network-reachable (AV:N). No additional prerequisites such as special configurations, specific enabled features, or elevated roles are described. What limits exploitation: the authentication requirement (PR:L) is the single gating factor - an attacker without any valid credentials cannot exploit this remotely. Default or factory credentials on unmanaged devices significantly weaken this barrier. No user interaction is required (UI:N) once authenticated. The attack is not rated as automatable (SSVC: Automatable: no), suggesting per-device authentication steps prevent trivial mass exploitation via scanning tools.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 2.1 is strikingly low for an OS command injection on a network device and warrants scrutiny. The low impact metrics (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L with no subsequent system impact SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) may reflect a sandboxed or restricted execution environment within the firmware, but this conflicts with the typical blast radius of CWE-78 on embedded Linux routers where CGI processes commonly run with elevated privileges. This discrepancy should be verified against the vendor or independent analysis before trusting the CVSS score as an accurate severity indicator. The EPSS score of 2.95% at the 87th percentile is a meaningful signal: while absolute probability is modest, this CVE ranks in exploitation likelihood above the vast majority of CVEs. CVSS AV:N/AC:L/AT:N confirms the attack is fully remote with no special conditions. PR:L indicates authenticated access is required, which is the primary limiting factor. SSVC rates Technical Impact as partial and Automatable as no, suggesting exploitation requires targeting individual devices rather than mass scanning. The existence of a public POC on GitHub (E:P in the CVSS vector) elevates urgency. Overall: real risk for any internet-exposed CA750-PoE device, constrained primarily by the low-privilege authentication requirement.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with low-privilege credentials to the Totolink CA750-PoE web interface - potentially default or weak credentials common on consumer routers - sends a crafted HTTP request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi with a malformed plugin_version parameter containing injected shell metacharacters (e.g., semicolons, backticks, or pipes). The setUnloadUserData function processes the parameter without sanitization and passes it to an OS shell call, executing attacker-controlled commands on the device firmware. A public proof-of-concept documenting this technique is available at https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/totolink4/vuln_53/53.md.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 2.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026

OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows a remote, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the device by manipulating the plugin_version parameter in the setUnloadUserData function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. A public proof-of-concept exploit exists on GitHub, and the EPSS percentile (87th) indicates this CVE carries meaningfully higher exploitation likelihood than the majority of published vulnerabilities despite its low CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1. No public exploit identified as actively exploited (CISA KEV), but POC availability on a network-accessible embedded device warrants prompt attention in exposed deployments.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch with a confirmed fix version has been identified at time of analysis. The Totolink vendor page (https://www.totolink.net/) should be monitored for firmware updates addressing CVE-2026-9515 or EUVD-2026-31771. As an immediate compensating control, restrict access to the device management interface (/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi) to trusted internal networks only by placing the device behind a firewall that blocks port 80/443 from untrusted sources - this eliminates remote exploitation while preserving local management. Additionally, disable remote management features if not operationally required. If administrative access must remain network-accessible, enforce network segmentation (VLAN isolation) to limit which hosts can reach the management plane. Note that these controls do not eliminate the vulnerability but reduce the attack surface to authenticated users already on the management network. Replacing affected devices with actively maintained alternatives should be evaluated given the absence of a confirmed patch.

Affected VersionsENISA

CA750-PoE 6.2c.510

Affected Packages

euvd ca750_poe no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Totolink CA750-PoE is a PoE-capable wireless router/access point running custom CGI-based firmware. The vulnerable component is the CGI handler /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, specifically the setUnloadUserData function responsible for processing user-submitted configuration data, including a plugin_version argument. CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command) indicates that user-supplied input is passed directly to a shell execution context - likely a call to system(), popen(), or equivalent - without adequate sanitization or argument escaping. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:totolink:ca750-poe:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all sub-versions, though the confirmed affected version per EUVD-2026-31771 is specifically 6.2c.510. This class of vulnerability is common in consumer and SMB-grade embedded networking firmware where input validation is often absent in CGI parameter handling.

Know when Ca750 Poe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
May 26, 2026 - 19:07 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
May 26, 2026 - 19:07 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was detected in Totolink CA750-PoE 6.2c.510. The affected element is the function setUnloadUserData of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation of the argument plugin_version results in os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
2.9%
Top 13% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 2.9%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +3
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy