Skip to main content

Totolink CA750-PoE CVE-2026-9533

| EUVDEUVD-2026-31791 LOW
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-05-26 VulDB GHSA-mh4r-64r2-gj28
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege router credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted HTTP request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters in fwUrl or magicid parameter
  4. Execution
    recvUpgradeNewFw passes unsanitized input to OS shell
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands on device

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Authentication is required - the CVSS 4.0 vector specifies PR:L (Low Privileges Required), meaning the attacker must hold at least a low-privileged authenticated session on the device's management interface before exploitation is possible. The vulnerable functionality is specifically the firmware upgrade handler (recvUpgradeNewFw) accessible via HTTP POST/GET to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi; the device's web management interface must be reachable by the attacker (AV:N indicates network reachability is assumed). No special non-default configuration is indicated as a prerequisite beyond having network access to the management interface. Exploitation is limited by the authentication requirement - unauthenticated network attackers cannot directly exploit this without first obtaining valid credentials. The management interface being exposed to untrusted networks (e.g., WAN-facing administration) significantly elevates real-world risk, as it removes the practical barrier of requiring LAN-side presence.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1 is notably low for a network-accessible OS command injection and warrants scrutiny. The vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) confirms low-complexity, network-reachable exploitation requiring only low-level privileges - characteristics that typically yield high base scores. The anomaly stems from all impact metrics being scored Low (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) with no downstream system impact (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), which appears to substantially understate the realistic consequence of arbitrary OS command execution on a router device, where full persistent compromise of the device is a plausible outcome. Security teams should treat this CVSS score with skepticism and assess actual impact independently. Contrasting signals reinforce the concern: the EPSS score of 2.95% places this vulnerability at the 87th percentile, indicating significantly higher-than-average exploitation likelihood among all tracked CVEs. A public proof-of-concept exploit exists on GitHub (no public exploit identified as confirmed actively exploited per CISA KEV at time of analysis), lowering the bar for less-sophisticated actors. The combination of a publicly available PoC, a network-accessible attack vector, low exploitation complexity, and an 87th-percentile EPSS score makes this a meaningful operational priority for organizations with this device deployed, despite the misleadingly low CVSS score.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained low-privilege credentials for the Totolink CA750-PoE management interface - via default credentials, credential reuse, or prior phishing - sends a crafted HTTP request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi targeting the firmware upgrade function, embedding shell metacharacters (e.g., semicolons, backticks, or pipe characters) within the fwUrl or magicid parameter values. The router's CGI handler passes the unsanitized input directly to an OS shell call, executing attacker-controlled commands with the privileges of the web server process. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating this exact technique is available at the referenced GitHub repository, enabling replication with minimal modification.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 2.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026

OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 enables remote attackers with low-level credentials to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the fwUrl and magicid parameters of the recvUpgradeNewFw function within /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The firmware upgrade Setting Handler fails to sanitize user-supplied input before passing it to the underlying OS shell, exposing the device to command execution. A public proof-of-concept exploit is available on GitHub; while not yet listed in CISA KEV, the EPSS 87th-percentile ranking signals elevated real-world exploitation interest relative to the broader vulnerability landscape.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patched firmware version has been identified at time of analysis - no Totolink advisory confirming a fixed firmware build was present in any referenced source. Organizations should monitor https://www.totolink.net/ for firmware updates addressing CVE-2026-9533. In the interim, restrict administrative web interface access (the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi endpoint) to trusted internal management networks only using firewall ACLs or router-level access controls, preventing remote exposure of the vulnerable handler - note this trade-off is that remote management capability will be lost. If the device supports disabling remote/WAN-side management interface access, enabling that restriction immediately reduces the network-exposed attack surface; the trade-off is loss of remote administration capability. Changing default credentials to strong unique passwords limits exploitation to attackers who have already obtained valid credentials, since PR:L requires authenticated access. The public PoC at https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/totolink4/vuln_56/56.md can be reviewed to understand the exact request structure for use in IDS/WAF signature development targeting the fwUrl and magicid parameters.

Affected VersionsENISA

CA750-PoE 6.2c.510

Affected Packages

euvd ca750_poe no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Totolink CA750-PoE is a PoE-capable wireless router running firmware 6.2c.510 (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:totolink:ca750-poe:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*). The vulnerable component is a CGI-based web management handler - specifically the recvUpgradeNewFw function inside /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi - responsible for processing remote firmware upgrade requests. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), meaning attacker-controlled values in the fwUrl or magicid POST/GET parameters are concatenated into a shell command without sanitization or escaping. This is a classic embedded device pattern where firmware upgrade routines invoke system() or popen() with partially-controlled strings, a well-understood class of vulnerability common to SOHO router firmware.

Know when Ca750 Poe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
May 26, 2026 - 13:37 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
May 26, 2026 - 13:37 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was detected in Totolink CA750-PoE 6.2c.510. The impacted element is the function recvUpgradeNewFw of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Setting Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument fwUrl/magicid results in os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
2.9%
Top 13% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 2.9%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +3
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy