Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to TinaCMS
-
DeliveryCreate symlink in content root
-
ExploitRequest file via symlink path
-
ExecutionAccess filesystem outside base directory
-
ImpactModify or exfiltrate files
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Authenticated user with filesystem write access to TinaCMS content root directory where symlink/junction can be pre-created or manipulated. Requires ability to craft FilesystemBridge requests targeting symlink paths (e.g., content/posts/pivot/owned.md) that resolve outside intended base directory. |
| Impact | Real-world risk is moderate-to-high depending on deployment context. The CVSS 7.1 (High) score reflects Network attack vector, High complexity, Low privileges required, and High confidentiality/integrity impact with Low availability impact. The AC:H (High complexity) rating is justified because exploitation requires either pre-existing symlinks/junctions committed to the content repository or an attacker's ability to create them through separate write access-this is not a simple parameter manipulation attack. The PR:L (Low privileges) requirement means any authenticated Tina CMS user could potentially exploit this if symlinks exist in their content tree. Impact is severe: arbitrary file read enables exposure of credentials, configuration files, and source code; arbitrary write enables code execution via overwriting application files or configuration; delete operations could cause availability impact. No EPSS score provided limits quantitative risk assessment, but absence from CISA KEV indicates no observed in-the-wild exploitation campaigns. The SSVC framework would likely classify this as 'Act' priority if the application stores sensitive data or runs with elevated privileges, given the confirmed exploit scenario (local reproduction demonstrated), automatable nature once symlinks exist, and high technical impact. Primary mitigating factors: attack complexity barrier and authentication requirement reduce opportunistic exploitation likelihood compared to unauthenticated RCE vulnerabilities. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated TinaCMS user with content editing privileges discovers or creates a symbolic link within the allowed content directory structure (for example, 'content/posts/pivot' pointing to '/etc' on Linux or 'C:\Windows\System32' on Windows). The attacker then crafts a GraphQL mutation to read, modify, or delete a file by specifying a relativePath parameter like 'pivot/passwd' or 'pivot/config/secrets.json'. The TinaCMS GraphQL resolver validates this path using string-based checks, which confirm the lexical path 'content/posts/pivot/passwd' is within the allowed 'content/posts' collection. The resolver passes this path to FilesystemBridge |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Apr 01, 2026
Path traversal via symlink/junction bypass in @tinacms/graphql FilesystemBridge allows authenticated remote attackers with low privileges to read, write, and delete arbitrary files outside the configured content root. The vulnerability exploits a realpath canonicalization gap where path validation checks lexical string paths but filesystem operations follow symlink targets. Attack complexity is high (CVSS AC:H) as it requires pre-existing symlinks/junctions within the content tree or the ability
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Path traversal via symlink/junction bypass in @tinacms/graphql FilesystemBridge allows authenticated remote attackers with low privileges to read, write, and delete arbitrary files outside the configured content root. The vulnerability exploits a realpath canonicalization gap where path validation checks lexical string paths but filesystem operations follow symlink targets. Attack complexity is high (CVSS AC:H) as it requires pre-existing symlinks/junctions within the content tree or the ability to create them. EPSS data not provided; no CISA KEV listing indicates no confirmed active exploitation. Vendor-released patch available via commit f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch immediately by upgrading to a TinaCMS version that includes commit f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955 or later. The patch is available at https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/commit/f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955. The fix implements realpath-aware canonicalization by resolving both the base directory and candidate file paths using fs.realpath() before performing containment checks, ensuring validation operates on actual filesystem targets rather than lexical path strings. For write operations, the patch canonicalizes the nearest existing parent directory before creating files to prevent race conditions. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement the following interim controls: audit all content repositories for existing symlinks and junctions, removing any that point outside the intended content root; enforce strict access controls on content write operations to prevent authenticated users from creating symlinks; deploy filesystem monitoring to detect symlink creation attempts; consider running the TinaCMS process with restricted filesystem permissions using chroot jails or containers to limit damage from successful exploitation. Review application logs for suspicious file access patterns involving nested paths that might indicate exploitation attempts. Consult the full security advisory at https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 for additional vendor guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in npm, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability resides in @tinacms/graphql's FilesystemBridge class, which implements content management filesystem operations. The bridge uses path.resolve() combined with startsWith() string checks to validate that requested file paths remain within the configured base directory. This is a classic TOCTOU (Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use) variant specific to filesystem semantics: the validation operates on lexical path strings (path.resolve() only normalizes directory separators and resolves '..' segments syntactically), but subsequent fs.readFile(), fs.outputFile(), and fs.remove() operations follow symlinks and Windows junctions to their actual targets. This creates a realpath canonicalization gap where a path like 'content/posts/pivot/owned.md' passes validation if 'pivot' is a symlink, even though the real target resolves to a location outside the content root (e.g., '/etc/passwd' or 'C:\Windows\System32\config'). The vulnerability is exploitable through Tina's GraphQL resolver layer, which constructs file paths from user-controlled 'relativePath' parameters and passes them to bridge methods. CWE-22 (Path Traversal) accurately categorizes this as improper limitation of pathname, though the specific failure mode is symlink-following rather than '../' sequence injection.
Know when Canonical gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionGitHub Advisory
Summary
@tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge:
path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, filepath))startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)
That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered "inside" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it.
As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root.
Details
The current bridge validation is:
function assertWithinBase(filepath: string, baseDir: string): string {
const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir);
const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, filepath));
if (
resolved !== resolvedBase &&
!resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)
) {
throw new Error(
`Path traversal detected: "${filepath}" escapes the base directory`
);
}
return resolved;
}But the bridge then performs real filesystem I/O on the resulting path:
public async get(filepath: string) {
const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, this.outputPath);
return (await fs.readFile(resolved)).toString();
}
public async put(filepath: string, data: string, basePathOverride?: string) {
const basePath = basePathOverride || this.outputPath;
const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, basePath);
await fs.outputFile(resolved, data);
}
public async delete(filepath: string) {
const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, this.outputPath);
await fs.remove(resolved);
}This is a classic realpath gap:
- validation checks the lexical path string
- the filesystem follows the link target during I/O
- the actual target can be outside the intended root
This is reachable from Tina's GraphQL/local database flow. The resolver builds a validated path from user-controlled relativePath, but that validation is also string-based:
const realPath = path.join(collection.path, relativePath);
this.validatePath(realPath, collection, relativePath);Database write and delete operations then call the bridge:
await this.bridge.put(normalizedPath, stringifiedFile);
...
await this.bridge.delete(normalizedPath);Local Reproduction
This was verified llocally with a real junction on Windows, which exercises the same failure mode as a symlink on Unix-like systems.
Test layout:
- content root:
D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4 - allowed collection path:
content/posts - junction inside collection:
content/posts/pivot -> D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\outside - file outside content root:
outside\secret.txt
Tina's current path-validation logic was applied and used to perform bridge-style read/write operations through the junction.
Observed result:
{
"graphqlBridge": {
"collectionPath": "content/posts",
"requestedRelativePath": "pivot/owned.md",
"validatedRealPath": "content\\posts\\pivot\\owned.md",
"bridgeResolvedPath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\content\\posts\\pivot\\owned.md",
"bridgeRead": "TOP_SECRET_FROM_OUTSIDE\\r\\n",
"outsideGraphqlWriteExists": true,
"outsideGraphqlWriteContents": "GRAPHQL_ESCAPE"
}
}That is the critical point:
- the path was accepted as inside
content/posts - the bridge read
outside\secret.txt - the bridge wrote
outside\owned.md
So the current containment check does not actually constrain filesystem access to the configured content root once a link exists inside that tree.
Impact
- Arbitrary file read/write outside the configured content root
- Potential delete outside the configured content root via the same
assertWithinBase()gap indelete() - Breaks the assumptions of the recent path-traversal fixes because only lexical traversal is blocked
- Practical attack chains where the content tree contains a committed symlink/junction, or an attacker can cause one to exist before issuing GraphQL/content operations
The exact network exploitability depends on how the application exposes Tina's GraphQL/content operations, but the underlying bridge bug is real and independently security-relevant.
Recommended Fix
The containment check needs to compare canonical filesystem paths, not just string-normalized paths.
For example:
- resolve the base with
fs.realpath() - resolve the candidate path's parent with
fs.realpath() - reject any request whose real target path escapes the real base
- for write operations, carefully canonicalize the nearest existing parent directory before creating the final file
In short: use realpath-aware containment checks for every filesystem sink, not path.resolve(...).startsWith(...) alone.
Resources
packages/@tinacms/graphql/src/database/bridge/filesystem.tspackages/@tinacms/graphql/src/database/index.tspackages/@tinacms/graphql/src/resolver/index.ts
Blast Radius
ecosystem impact- 6 npm packages depend on @tinacms/graphql (3 direct, 3 indirect)
Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 2.2.2.
Executive ViewAI
A path traversal vulnerability in TinaCMS GraphQL FilesystemBridge allows authenticated users with low privileges to read, write, and delete files outside the configured content directory through symlink manipulation. Organizations using TinaCMS should prioritize patching this HIGH severity vulnerability to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive files on affected servers.
Apply vendor patch. If immediate patching is not feasible: restrict authenticated user access to TinaCMS to trusted administrators only; disable symlink/junction creation within content root directories via filesystem ACLs or file integrity monitoring; implement strict file system permissions to prevent low-privilege user exploitation; monitor and log all file operations within TinaCMS content directories for anomalous activity.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
Related Vulnerabilities in TinaCMS Path Traversal Vulnerabilities
View all 2Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it
GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6.
When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTT
Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe
Race condition in mm/gup.c in the Linux kernel 2.x through 4.x before 4.8.3 allows local users to gain privileges by lev
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, and
Local privilege escalation in the GNU C Library (glibc) dynamic loader ld.so allows unprivileged local users on affected
EUVD-2026-17965
GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB