Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttacker provisions two mutually-referencing glue-less zones
-
DeliveryVictim recursor queries a name in those zones
-
ExploitRecursor follows cyclic sibling NS referrals in a loop
-
ExecutionZero-TTL NS records amplify repeated upstream queries
-
ImpactQuery budget exhausted, resolver availability degraded
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to control two DNS zones whose name servers are cyclic sibling references into each other's zones AND that omit the required glue (A/AAAA) records for those name servers (RFC 9471 section 2.3), so that at least one zone that should supply name-server addresses does not - making the delegation unresolvable and forcing the recursor into repeated lookups. The victim must run the Hickory recursive resolver (hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2, or hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1 up to the 0.26.2 fix) and be made to resolve a name under those attacker zones. Amplification is maximized when the referral NS records carry a TTL of zero, defeating caching and multiplying upstream queries. LIMITING FACTORS: although the CVSS vector is PR:N/UI:N (no authentication or victim interaction), the attacker must first set up and host the malicious cyclic zones, and impact is confined to availability/resource consumption (VC:N/VI:N) - there is no confidentiality or integrity effect. The hickory-recursor branch has no fixed version available yet, so operators of that crate cannot simply upgrade. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but bounded availability risk, not a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) with VA:H and VC:N/VI:N describes a pure availability (denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion, CWE-400/406/674) issue reachable over the network without authentication or user interaction, which drives the 8.7 score. However, the described mechanism imposes a real precondition the CVSS vector does not capture: the attacker must control two DNS zones configured with cyclic sibling name-server referrals lacking glue records, so exploitation is attacker-setup-dependent rather than a flaw triggerable against an arbitrary target with a single packet. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week' (not act_now/emergency). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no confirmed public exploit code are present in the input - exploitation status is therefore 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. Net: a credible, low-complexity amplification DoS against recursive-resolver deployments that worsens with zero-TTL NS records, but mitigated in practice by the limited real-world footprint of the affected Rust resolver and the need for attacker-controlled malicious zones; prioritize as a scheduled (this-week) fix, especially noting the recursor crate is not yet patched. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker registers two DNS zones whose name servers name-reference each other but publish no glue (IP) records, then induces a victim's Hickory recursive resolver to resolve a name under those zones. The recursor repeatedly chases the unresolvable cyclic referrals, issuing many upstream queries until its per-request budget is exhausted, and zero-TTL NS records inflate the query count further - amplifying load on the resolver and upstream infrastructure. No public exploit code is identified in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 08, 2026
Denial of service in the Hickory DNS recursive resolver: unauthenticated remote attackers who control two cyclic sibling zones lacking glue records can drive repeated upstream lookups until the per-request query budget is exhausted, with zero-TTL NS records amplifying the volume. Affected are hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2, which the advisory lists as not yet patched, and hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1 and later, fixed in 0.26.2. Impact is confined to availability (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H), no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and this is a genuine but bounded availability risk rather than a top-tier emergency.
RemediationAI
Upgrade hickory-resolver to 0.26.2, the version the advisory lists as fixed and the only released fix identified in the available data. For hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 the advisory records "fixed in: not yet patched", so no vendor-released patch exists at time of analysis and operators of that crate cannot simply upgrade; track GHSA-cx5j-p54p-q756 at https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-cx5j-p54p-q756 and the VulnCheck advisory for a fixed release. The available sources do not describe a vendor workaround, and the attacker-controlled zero-TTL setting is not something the victim can configure away; the exploitation prerequisites imply that limiting the recursor to trusted internal namespaces reduces exposure as a stopgap, with the trade-off of losing general-purpose resolution, but this is a compensating measure rather than a complete fix - the vendor's complete remedy is the patched version.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
DNS recursion relies on glue records (A/AAAA addresses shipped alongside NS records in referrals) so a resolver can reach the next-closest name server without a separate lookup. RFC 9471 section 2.3 describes cyclic sibling delegations, where two zones list name servers that live in each other's zones; if neither zone supplies glue for those names the delegation is unresolvable and a resolver should abort early. Hickory DNS did not stop resolution as soon as it could, instead following referrals in a loop and issuing many upstream queries until the per-request query budget was exhausted, which is uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-400); the advisory also classifies the behavior as CWE-406 (insufficient control of network message volume) and CWE-674 (uncontrolled recursion). The trigger is attacker-side: the attacker must host the two cyclic, glue-less zones and induce the victim recursor to resolve a name beneath them, and zero-TTL NS records defeat caching so the query count is not damped. The CVSS:4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, VA:H) and the assessed CVSS:3.1 vector both confirm remote, unauthenticated triggering with no victim interaction and availability-only impact.
Know when Hickory Dns gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable unauthenticated amplification against the resolver requires no victim config, so AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; impact is availability-only (A:H, C:N/I:N) on the same resolver (S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Hickory DNS 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 contains a query amplification vulnerability in its recursive resolver, which mishandles cyclic sibling name server referrals that lack glue records. Attackers controlling two zones whose name servers reference each other without glue records can make the recursor loop, sending many upstream queries, amplified further by zero-TTL NS records.
Technical POC Analysis
Evidence caveat: the only artefact supplied is advisory GHSA-cx5j-p54p-q756.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
A denial-of-service vulnerability in the Hickory DNS recursive resolver (hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3-0.25.2 and hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1+) could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to exhaust query budgets and degrade DNS resolution availability. While no public exploit code has been identified, any organization relying on these components for DNS infrastructure faces potential service disruption, making it a manageable but notable availability concern for security leadership.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; implement rate limiting on recursive DNS queries, restrict upstream query access to trusted networks, monitor for query budget exhaustion, and consider isolating or replacing hickory-recursor with an alternative resolver until a fix is available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Related Vulnerabilities in Hickory DNS Multiple Security Flaws
View all 36More in Hickory Dns
View allMalformed TSIG records can crash Hickory DNS 0.26.0 through 0.26.1 builds compiled with overflow checks enabled, causing
Remote, unauthenticated memory-amplification denial of service affects Hickory DNS (the hickory-proto crate) versions 0.
EUVD-2026-119345
GHSA-fcx4-92qj-2p7q
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB